Clyde William, Kakolyris Andreas, Koimisis Georgios
Department of Economics & Finance, O' Malley School of Business, Manhattan College, Riverdale, NY 10471 USA.
School of Accounting and Finance, College of Business and Public Management, Kean University, Union, NJ 07083 USA.
East Econ J. 2021;47(4):487-505. doi: 10.1057/s41302-021-00202-x. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
We investigate the effectiveness of seven government containment and policy closure interventions against the novel coronavirus (SARS-COV-2) pandemic in the OECD countries, at several different time horizons. Our results indicate that only school closings and public transportation closings have a persistently significant impact. Stay-at-home policies only show a significant impact after 70 days. Workplace closings, restrictions on the size of gatherings, and restrictions on internal travel show no significant impact on mortality rates. Moreover, stricter measures are not significantly associated with lower growth rates in mortality.
我们研究了经济合作与发展组织(OECD)国家针对新型冠状病毒(SARS-COV-2)大流行采取的七种政府防控和政策封锁干预措施在几个不同时间范围内的有效性。我们的结果表明,只有学校关闭和公共交通关闭具有持续显著的影响。居家政策仅在70天后才显示出显著影响。工作场所关闭、集会规模限制和国内旅行限制对死亡率没有显著影响。此外,更严格的措施与死亡率较低的增长率没有显著关联。