• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全髋关节置换术后髋臼前倾角的测量:两种影像学方法的比较

Measuring Acetabular Version after Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Comparison of Two Radiographic Methods.

作者信息

Cardoso Afonso, Duarte Mafalda, Viegas Rui, Oliveira Filipe, Pinto Pedro, Rego Paulo

机构信息

Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Hospital Beatriz Ângelo, Loures, Portugal.

Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.

出版信息

Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2021 Aug;56(4):513-516. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1721360. Epub 2021 Mar 22.

DOI:10.1055/s-0040-1721360
PMID:34483397
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8405260/
Abstract

The objective of the present work was to compare the measurement of acetabular component version on anteroposterior (AP) and on cross-table radiographs after total hip arthroplasty (THA).  Radiographs of 60 hips with a primary THA were selected. Version was calculated on the AP radiograph using the Lewinnek method and, on the cross-table, using the Woo and Morrey direct method.  Mean and standard deviation (SD) were different on both radiographs, being 9.7° ± 5.5° on the AP, whereas in the cross-table the measurements were 20.6° ± 8.4° (  < 0.001). Minding our aim of 10°, the cross-table measurements were statistically different from it (  < 0.001), while the AP measurement did not differ (  = 0.716).  The present study showed that the best way to correctly evaluate the acetabular component positioning following a THA is by measuring anteversion and abduction on an AP radiograph after confirming, in a cross-table radiograph, that the component is not retroverted.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较全髋关节置换术(THA)后前后位(AP)和交叉台面X线片上髋臼假体旋转角度的测量结果。选择60例初次行THA的髋关节X线片。使用Lewinnek方法在AP X线片上计算旋转角度,在交叉台面X线片上使用Woo和Morrey直接法计算旋转角度。两张X线片上的平均值和标准差(SD)不同,AP片上为9.7°±5.5°,而在交叉台面X线片上测量值为20.6°±8.4°(P<0.001)。考虑到我们设定的10°目标,交叉台面测量值与之有统计学差异(P<0.001),而AP测量值无差异(P=0.716)。本研究表明,在THA后正确评估髋臼假体位置的最佳方法是在交叉台面X线片确认假体无后倾后,在AP X线片上测量前倾角和外展角。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0a8/8405260/52bfb0af1410/10-1055-s-0040-1721360-i2000063pt-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0a8/8405260/5a3aa00dbff6/10-1055-s-0040-1721360-i2000063en-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0a8/8405260/519b923686d6/10-1055-s-0040-1721360-i2000063en-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0a8/8405260/4f66bba897a5/10-1055-s-0040-1721360-i2000063pt-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0a8/8405260/52bfb0af1410/10-1055-s-0040-1721360-i2000063pt-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0a8/8405260/5a3aa00dbff6/10-1055-s-0040-1721360-i2000063en-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0a8/8405260/519b923686d6/10-1055-s-0040-1721360-i2000063en-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0a8/8405260/4f66bba897a5/10-1055-s-0040-1721360-i2000063pt-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0a8/8405260/52bfb0af1410/10-1055-s-0040-1721360-i2000063pt-2.jpg

相似文献

1
Measuring Acetabular Version after Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Comparison of Two Radiographic Methods.全髋关节置换术后髋臼前倾角的测量:两种影像学方法的比较
Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2021 Aug;56(4):513-516. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1721360. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
2
Assessing the Reliability of Postoperative Cross-Table Radiographs Compared to CT Scans for Measuring Acetabular Anteversion Angle Following Total Hip Arthroplasty.评估全髋关节置换术后用于测量髋臼前倾角的术后交叉台面X线片与CT扫描相比的可靠性。
Cureus. 2024 Sep 3;16(9):e68575. doi: 10.7759/cureus.68575. eCollection 2024 Sep.
3
Assessment of Acetabular Component Anteversion after Total Hip Arthroplasty: Comparison of Anteroposterior and Cross-Table Lateral Radiographs with Computed Tomography Scans.全髋关节置换术后髋臼假体前倾角评估:前后位和蛙式位 X 线片与 CT 扫描的比较。
Clin Orthop Surg. 2021 Sep;13(3):329-335. doi: 10.4055/cios20274. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
4
The best method for evaluating anteversion of the acetabular component after total hip arthroplasty on plain radiographs.全髋关节置换术后在X线平片上评估髋臼假体前倾角的最佳方法。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 Apr 2;13(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0767-4.
5
The validity and reproducibility of cross table radiographs compared with CT scans for the measurement of anteversion of the acetabular component after total hip arthroplasty.全髋关节置换术后,与CT扫描相比,十字表X线片测量髋臼组件前倾角的有效性和可重复性。
Bone Joint J. 2017 Aug;99-B(8):1006-1011. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B8.BJJ-2016-1158.R2.
6
Could We Expect Postoperative Cup Anteversion after Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Postoperative Plain Anteroposterior and Lateral Radiograph? A Three-Dimensional Experimental Operation Study.我们能否通过术后普通前后位和侧位X线片来预测全髋关节置换术后髋臼前倾角?一项三维实验性手术研究。
J Clin Med. 2023 Oct 21;12(20):6664. doi: 10.3390/jcm12206664.
7
New cross-table lateral radiography method for measuring acetabular component anteversion in total hip arthroplasty: a prospective study of 93 primary THA.全髋关节置换术中测量髋臼假体前倾角的新型交叉台侧位X线摄影方法:93例初次全髋关节置换术的前瞻性研究
Hip Int. 2017 May 12;27(3):293-298. doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000456. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
8
The reliability and accuracy of measuring anteversion of the acetabular component on plain anteroposterior and lateral radiographs after total hip arthroplasty.全髋关节置换术后,在普通前后位和侧位X线片上测量髋臼假体前倾角的可靠性和准确性。
Bone Joint J. 2015 May;97-B(5):611-6. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B5.34735.
9
Accuracy of planar anteversion measurements using anteroposterior radiographs.使用前后位 X 线片测量髋臼前倾角的准确性。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Dec 5;20(1):586. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2979-0.
10
Digital Radiography in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Technique and Radiographic Results.数字 X 射线摄影在全髋关节置换术中的应用:技术与影像学结果。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Feb 7;100(3):226-235. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.01501.

本文引用的文献

1
Current Concepts in Acetabular Positioning in Total Hip Arthroplasty.全髋关节置换术中髋臼定位的当前概念
Indian J Orthop. 2017 Jul-Aug;51(4):386-396. doi: 10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_144_17.
2
What Safe Zone? The Vast Majority of Dislocated THAs Are Within the Lewinnek Safe Zone for Acetabular Component Position.什么安全区?绝大多数脱位的全髋关节置换术(THA)髋臼组件位置处于Lewinnek安全区内。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Feb;474(2):386-91. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4432-5.
3
Cup position alone does not predict risk of dislocation after hip arthroplasty.
单纯髋臼位置并不能预测髋关节置换术后脱位的风险。
J Arthroplasty. 2015 Jan;30(1):109-13. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.07.009. Epub 2014 Jul 11.
4
Acetabular component positioning using anatomic landmarks of the acetabulum.使用髋臼的解剖标志进行髋臼部件定位。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Dec;470(12):3515-23. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2460-y. Epub 2012 Jul 10.
5
Measuring acetabular component version after THA: CT or plain radiograph?全髋关节置换术后髋臼假体型号的测量:CT 还是平片?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Oct;470(10):2810-8. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2292-9. Epub 2012 Mar 1.
6
Reliability and validity of measuring version of the acetabular component.髋臼部件测量版本的可靠性和有效性。
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Jan;94(1):32-6. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B1.27621.
7
Difference between 2 measurement methods of version angles of the acetabular component.髋臼部件前倾角两种测量方法之间的差异。
J Arthroplasty. 2007 Aug;22(5):715-20. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2006.07.011.
8
Measuring anatomical acetabular cup orientation with a new X-ray technique.使用一种新的X射线技术测量髋臼杯的解剖学方位。
Comput Aided Surg. 2006 Mar;11(2):69-75. doi: 10.3109/10929080600640618.
9
Reducing the risk of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: the effect of orientation of the acetabular component.降低全髋关节置换术后脱位风险:髋臼组件方向的影响
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005 Jun;87(6):762-9. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.87B6.14745.
10
Compliant positioning of total hip components for optimal range of motion.全髋关节组件的顺应性定位以实现最佳运动范围。
J Orthop Res. 2004 Jul;22(4):815-21. doi: 10.1016/j.orthres.2003.11.001.