• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

髋臼部件前倾角两种测量方法之间的差异。

Difference between 2 measurement methods of version angles of the acetabular component.

作者信息

Arai Noriyuki, Nakamura Shigeru, Matsushita Takashi

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

J Arthroplasty. 2007 Aug;22(5):715-20. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2006.07.011.

DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2006.07.011
PMID:17689782
Abstract

We evaluated the relationship and the difference between measurements of version angles (VAs) of the acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty taken using 2 different methods. One VA was measured on an anteroposterior radiograph of the hip joint (VAP) and the other on a cross-table lateral radiograph (VCL) in 97 hips after surgery (clinical data) and 6 sawbone pelvic models (model data). There was a positive correlation between VAP and VCL for both data. Mean and standard deviation of the differences (VCL - VAP) between the 2 measurements were 5 degrees +/- 4.2 degrees in clinical data and -0.01 degrees +/- 0.32 degrees in model data. These differences on clinical data should be taken into consideration when comparing VAs in the literature using different measuring methods.

摘要

我们评估了在全髋关节置换术中使用两种不同方法测量髋臼组件的版本角度(VA)之间的关系和差异。在97例术后髋关节(临床数据)和6个锯骨骨盆模型(模型数据)中,一个VA在髋关节前后位X线片上测量(VAP),另一个在交叉台侧位X线片上测量(VCL)。两种数据的VAP和VCL之间均呈正相关。临床数据中两次测量之间差异(VCL - VAP)的平均值和标准差为5度±4.2度,模型数据中为-0.01度±0.32度。在使用不同测量方法比较文献中的VA时,应考虑临床数据中的这些差异。

相似文献

1
Difference between 2 measurement methods of version angles of the acetabular component.髋臼部件前倾角两种测量方法之间的差异。
J Arthroplasty. 2007 Aug;22(5):715-20. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2006.07.011.
2
Accuracy and precision of version angle measurements of the acetabular component after total hip arthroplasty.全髋关节置换术后髋臼组件切迹角测量的准确性和精确性。
J Arthroplasty. 2013 Oct;28(9):1644-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.02.014. Epub 2013 Apr 6.
3
Measurements of acetabular cup position and pelvic spatial orientation after total hip arthroplasty using computed tomography/radiography matching.使用计算机断层扫描/放射摄影匹配技术测量全髋关节置换术后髋臼杯位置和骨盆空间方位。
Comput Aided Surg. 2005 Jan;10(1):37-43. doi: 10.3109/10929080500178032.
4
Method to reduce variations of inclination angle of the acetabular component during mini-incision hip arthroplasty.减少小切口髋关节置换术中髋臼组件倾斜角度变化的方法。
J Orthop Sci. 2006 May;11(3):254-8. doi: 10.1007/s00776-006-1006-0.
5
Reliability and Validity of Standing Lateral Radiograph Method for Measuring Acetabular Component Version: A Modified Cross-table Lateral Radiograph Method.站立位侧位 X 线片测量髋臼假体型号的可靠性和有效性:改良的骨盆前后位 X 线片测量方法。
Orthop Surg. 2022 Aug;14(8):1622-1629. doi: 10.1111/os.13373. Epub 2022 Jun 16.
6
Measurements of pelvic flexion angle using three-dimensional computed tomography.使用三维计算机断层扫描测量骨盆屈曲角度。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003 Jun(411):140-51. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000069891.31220.fd.
7
Is a Stem Version on the Crosstable Lateral Radiograph Accurate in Total Hip Arthroplasty?髋关节置换术中十字交叉侧位X线片上的柄部版本是否准确?
J Arthroplasty. 2016 Jun;31(6):1356-1360. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.12.022. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
8
Plain Radiographs are a Useful Substitute for Computed Tomography in Evaluating Acetabular Cup Version.在评估髋臼杯假体的外展角时,普通X线片是计算机断层扫描的一种有用替代方法。
J Arthroplasty. 2016 Oct;31(10):2320-4. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.03.006. Epub 2016 Mar 15.
9
[Radiologic evaluation of cup placement variation in conventional total hip arthroplasty].
Rofo. 2007 Jan;179(1):46-52. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-927085.
10
Effect of pelvic tilt on acetabular retroversion: a study of pelves from cadavers.骨盆倾斜对髋臼后倾的影响:一项对尸体骨盆的研究
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003 Feb(407):241-8. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200302000-00033.

引用本文的文献

1
Radiological assessment of cup anteversion with a novel 3D-printed highly-porous titanium dual mobility cup.使用新型3D打印高孔隙率钛双动髋臼杯对髋臼前倾角进行影像学评估。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Feb 8;20(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05555-z.
2
Predicting acetabular version in native hip joints through plain x-ray radiographs: a comparative analysis of convolutional neural network model and the current gold standard, with insights and implications for hip arthroplasty.通过普通X线平片预测天然髋关节的髋臼前倾角:卷积神经网络模型与当前金标准的对比分析,及其对髋关节置换术的见解和影响
Front Surg. 2024 Oct 15;11:1329085. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1329085. eCollection 2024.
3
Measuring Acetabular Version after Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Comparison of Two Radiographic Methods.
全髋关节置换术后髋臼前倾角的测量:两种影像学方法的比较
Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2021 Aug;56(4):513-516. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1721360. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
4
Accuracy of planar anteversion measurements using anteroposterior radiographs.使用前后位 X 线片测量髋臼前倾角的准确性。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Dec 5;20(1):586. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2979-0.
5
The best method for evaluating anteversion of the acetabular component after total hip arthroplasty on plain radiographs.全髋关节置换术后在X线平片上评估髋臼假体前倾角的最佳方法。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 Apr 2;13(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0767-4.
6
How Reliable is the Acetabular Cup Position Assessment from Routine Radiographs?常规X线片对髋臼杯位置的评估有多可靠?
Iowa Orthop J. 2017;37:181-187.
7
A cadaver study validating CT assessment of acetabular component orientation: the Perth CT hip protocol.一项验证髋臼假体组件方向CT评估的尸体研究:珀斯CT髋关节方案。
Skeletal Radiol. 2017 Feb;46(2):177-183. doi: 10.1007/s00256-016-2527-z. Epub 2016 Nov 8.
8
Correlation of Structural Bony Abnormalities and Mechanical Symptoms of Hip Joints.髋关节结构骨异常与机械性症状的相关性
Hip Pelvis. 2014 Jun;26(2):115-23. doi: 10.5371/hp.2014.26.2.115. Epub 2014 Jun 30.
9
Anteroposterior Radiographs Are More Accurate than Cross-Table Lateral Radiographs for Acetabular Anteversion Assessment: a Retrospective Cohort Study.前后位X线片在髋臼前倾角评估中比交叉台面侧位X线片更准确:一项回顾性队列研究。
HSS J. 2016 Feb;12(1):32-8. doi: 10.1007/s11420-015-9472-6. Epub 2015 Oct 19.
10
Comparison between component designs with different femoral head size in metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty; multicenter randomized prospective study.金属对金属全髋关节置换术中不同股骨头尺寸组件设计的比较;多中心随机前瞻性研究。
J Orthop. 2015 Jun 10;12(4):228-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2015.05.008. eCollection 2015 Dec.