• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于 IPOCC 方法的医院绩效评估模型。

A Hospital Performance Assessment Model Using the IPOCC Approach.

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.

Department of Public Health, Health Sciences Research Center, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.

出版信息

Ethiop J Health Sci. 2021 May;31(3):533-542. doi: 10.4314/ejhs.v31i3.10.

DOI:10.4314/ejhs.v31i3.10
PMID:34483610
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8365489/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Developing a practical model to assess hospital performance improves the quality of services and leads to patient satisfaction. This study aims to develop and present such a model using the IPOCC (Input, Process, Output, Control and Context) approach.

METHODS

This study used a mixed-method research. The statistical population of the qualitative part included 27 experts who were purposefully selected and the sampling process was continued by the snowball method until the data saturation was reached. The quantitative part included 334 managers at different levels within a hospital, who were selected by a random sampling method based on Cochran's formula.

RESULTS

The hospital evaluation model has 5 dimensions with 20 factors: input (human, financial, physical, information and equipment), process (treatment, para-clinical, prevention, management, and leadership processes), outcome (patient, staff and community outcomes and key performance index), control (internal control, external control), context (hospital culture, hospital status, the role of evaluators and community conditions). The value of chi-square was 4689.154, the degree of freedom was 2385, and the ratio of chi-square to the degree of freedom in the model was 1.966, which is an acceptable value. The values obtained from CFI, GFI, and IFI fit indices were acceptable. The SRMR index was 0.1130.

CONCLUSIONS

Using a performance assessment model along with the IPOCC approach evaluates hospital processes and the output obtained from the proper implementation of these processes in all areas. The areas include the hospital provided services like the control and context, or the traditional perspectives like physical, human, financial, and equipment resources.

摘要

背景

开发实用的医院绩效评估模型可提高服务质量并提升患者满意度。本研究旨在采用 IPOCC(投入、过程、产出、控制和环境)方法开发并呈现此类模型。

方法

本研究采用混合方法研究。定性部分的统计人群包括 27 名专家,他们是通过有针对性的选择确定的,抽样过程通过滚雪球法继续进行,直到达到数据饱和。定量部分包括 334 名不同级别的医院管理人员,他们是根据 Cochran 公式通过随机抽样法选择的。

结果

该医院评估模型有 5 个维度,包含 20 个因素:投入(人力、财务、物质、信息和设备)、过程(治疗、辅助临床、预防、管理和领导过程)、产出(患者、员工和社区结果和关键绩效指标)、控制(内部控制、外部控制)、环境(医院文化、医院地位、评估者的角色和社区条件)。卡方值为 4689.154,自由度为 2385,模型中的卡方自由度比为 1.966,这是一个可接受的值。CFI、GFI 和 IFI 拟合指数得到的数值是可接受的。SRMR 指数为 0.1130。

结论

使用绩效评估模型和 IPOCC 方法评估医院流程以及在所有领域从这些流程的正确实施中获得的产出。这些领域包括医院提供的服务,如控制和环境,或传统的物理、人力、财务和设备资源视角。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72f0/8365489/ea149d6c00d8/EJHS3103-0533Fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72f0/8365489/fa0909afd276/EJHS3103-0533Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72f0/8365489/ea149d6c00d8/EJHS3103-0533Fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72f0/8365489/fa0909afd276/EJHS3103-0533Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72f0/8365489/ea149d6c00d8/EJHS3103-0533Fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
A Hospital Performance Assessment Model Using the IPOCC Approach.基于 IPOCC 方法的医院绩效评估模型。
Ethiop J Health Sci. 2021 May;31(3):533-542. doi: 10.4314/ejhs.v31i3.10.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
A Comparison of Three Models of Hospital Performance Assessment Using IPOCC Approach.使用IPOCC方法对三种医院绩效评估模型的比较
Ethiop J Health Sci. 2019 Sep;29(5):543-550. doi: 10.4314/ejhs.v29i5.3.
4
[French validation of the Verona Service Satisfaction Scale-VSSS-54F].[《维罗纳服务满意度量表 - VSSS - 54F》的法语验证]
Encephale. 2003 Mar-Apr;29(2):110-8.
5
Designing an Informal Payment Model for Patients Admitted in the Iran Health System: A qualitative Study.为伊朗卫生系统住院患者设计非正式支付模式:定性研究。
Ethiop J Health Sci. 2021 Jul;31(4):885-896. doi: 10.4314/ejhs.v31i4.24.
6
Authentic leadership, organizational culture and the effects of hospital quality management practices on quality of care and patient satisfaction.真实型领导、组织文化以及医院质量管理实践对医疗质量和患者满意度的影响。
J Adv Nurs. 2023 Aug;79(8):3102-3114. doi: 10.1111/jan.15663. Epub 2023 Mar 31.
7
The clinician safety culture and leadership questionnaire: refinement and validation in Australian public hospitals.临床医生安全文化和领导力问卷:澳大利亚公立医院的改进和验证。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2020 Feb 6;32(Supplement_1):52-59. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzz106.
8
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.卡塔尔国重症监护网络。
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019.
9
Six Sigma: not for the faint of heart.六西格玛:并非胆小者所能驾驭。
Radiol Manage. 2003 Mar-Apr;25(2):40-53.
10
Assessing the Organizational Characteristics Influencing Quality Improvement Implementation in Saudi Hospitals.评估影响沙特医院质量改进实施的组织特征。
Qual Manag Health Care. 2018 Jan/Mar;27(1):8-16. doi: 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000152.

引用本文的文献

1
Hospital performance evaluation models: A scoping review.医院绩效评估模型:一项范围综述。
J Educ Health Promot. 2025 Apr 30;14:150. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1367_23. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
A Comparison of Three Models of Hospital Performance Assessment Using IPOCC Approach.使用IPOCC方法对三种医院绩效评估模型的比较
Ethiop J Health Sci. 2019 Sep;29(5):543-550. doi: 10.4314/ejhs.v29i5.3.
2
Awareness and Observance of Patient Rights from the Perspective of Iranian Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.从伊朗患者视角看患者权利的认知与遵守:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Iran J Med Sci. 2017 May;42(3):227-234.
3
The Effect of ISO 9001 and the EFQM Model on Improving Hospital Performance: A Systematic Review.ISO 9001和欧洲质量管理基金会模型对改善医院绩效的影响:一项系统综述。
Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2015 Dec 27;17(12):e23010. doi: 10.5812/ircmj.23010. eCollection 2015 Dec.
4
Designing and evaluating a balanced scorecard for a health information management department in a Canadian urban non-teaching hospital.为加拿大城市非教学医院的健康信息管理部门设计并评估平衡计分卡。
Health Informatics J. 2016 Jun;22(2):120-39. doi: 10.1177/1460458214537005. Epub 2014 Jun 19.
5
Challenging the holy grail of hospital accreditation: a cross sectional study of inpatient satisfaction in the field of cardiology.挑战医院认证的圣杯:心脏病学领域住院患者满意度的横断面研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 May 12;10:120. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-120.
6
Health sector accreditation research: a systematic review.卫生部门认证研究:一项系统综述。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2008 Jun;20(3):172-83. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzn005. Epub 2008 Mar 13.
7
An international review of projects on hospital performance assessment.一项关于医院绩效评估项目的国际综述。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2008 Jun;20(3):162-71. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzn008. Epub 2008 Mar 13.
8
Feasibility first: developing public performance indicators on patient safety and clinical effectiveness for Dutch hospitals.可行性优先:为荷兰医院制定患者安全和临床疗效方面的公共绩效指标。
Health Policy. 2005 Dec;75(1):59-73. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2005.02.007.
9
A performance assessment framework for hospitals: the WHO regional office for Europe PATH project.医院绩效评估框架:世界卫生组织欧洲区域办事处PATH项目
Int J Qual Health Care. 2005 Dec;17(6):487-96. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzi072. Epub 2005 Sep 9.
10
Competing values of emergency department performance: balancing multiple stakeholder perspectives.急诊科绩效的相互竞争的价值观:平衡多个利益相关者的观点。
Health Serv Res. 2004 Aug;39(4 Pt 1):771-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00257.x.