Ciobanu Ruxandra Oana, Fokkema Tineke
Institute of demography and socioeconomics, Centre for the Interdisciplinary Study of Gerontology and Vulnerability and Swiss National Centre of Competence in Research LIVES, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demography Institute (NIDI-KNAW), University of Groningen, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Eur J Ageing. 2020 Sep 17;18(3):323-331. doi: 10.1007/s10433-020-00579-2. eCollection 2021 Sep.
The topic of loneliness among older migrants has recently gained scholarly interest. There is a particular focus on why older migrants are generally lonelier than their non-migrant peers from the destination. These studies neglect variations both within and between older migrant groups. Our qualitative study is innovative for three reasons. First, it focuses on Romanian migrants aged 65+ who fled communism and aged in place in Switzerland-an understudied population of former political refugees that experiences little or no loneliness in later years. Second, it takes a life-course approach to explore experiences of loneliness during communist Romania, in the context of migration and later in life. Third, it focuses on protective and coping factors rather than risk factors. Having been through hard times in communist Romania-marked by fear and distrust among people and estrangement from society-older Romanian migrants built strength to withstand difficult times, learned to embrace solitude, and/or to relativise current hardships, if any. Upon arrival many founded or joined an association or church, which offers the opportunity to establish a sustainable social network consisting of a large pool of Romanian non-kin with a shared past and experience of migration and integration, to counteract social losses in later life. When moments of loneliness cannot be prevented (e.g. due to death of a spouse), they try to be active to distract from loneliness or 'simply' accept the situation. These aspects need to be taken into account in future research and when developing loneliness interventions.
老年移民的孤独问题最近引起了学术界的关注。人们特别关注为什么老年移民通常比目的地的非移民同龄人更孤独。这些研究忽视了老年移民群体内部和群体之间的差异。我们的定性研究在三个方面具有创新性。第一,它关注65岁及以上逃离共产主义并在瑞士原地养老的罗马尼亚移民——这是一个研究较少的前政治难民群体,他们在晚年很少或几乎没有孤独感。第二,它采用生命历程方法来探索在共产主义时期的罗马尼亚、移民背景下以及晚年的孤独经历。第三,它关注保护因素和应对因素而非风险因素。经历过共产主义罗马尼亚时期的艰难岁月——其特点是人与人之间充满恐惧和不信任以及与社会疏离——老年罗马尼亚移民积累了抵御困难时期的力量,学会了接受孤独,和/或淡化当前的艰辛(如果有的话)。一到瑞士,许多人就成立或加入了一个协会或教会,这提供了一个机会,建立一个由大量有共同移民和融入经历的罗马尼亚非亲属组成的可持续社会网络,以抵消晚年的社会损失。当孤独时刻无法避免时(例如由于配偶去世),他们会尝试积极活动以转移对孤独的注意力,或者“ simply ”接受现状。在未来的研究和制定孤独干预措施时,需要考虑这些方面。