Suppr超能文献

采用双“8”字自体移植物包裹技术同期重建肩锁关节和喙锁韧带治疗慢性肩锁关节分离

Concomitant Acromioclavicular and Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction with a Duo-Figure-8 Autogenic Graft Wrapping Technique for Treating Chronic Acromioclavicular Separation.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

出版信息

Clin Orthop Surg. 2021 Sep;13(3):366-375. doi: 10.4055/cios20194. Epub 2021 Mar 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUD

Coracoacromial ligament transfer is the traditional procedure for treating chronic acromioclavicular separation, but it is significantly inferior to ligament reconstruction according to biomechanical and clinical studies. However, ligament reconstruction carries the risk of complications of graft loosening and peri-tunnel fractures. Currently, there is no ligament reconstruction procedure optimal for preventing such complications. The purpose of this study was to describe and retrospectively analyze the clinical and radiological outcomes of a "duo-figure-8" autogenic graft wrapping technique, which was used to concomitantly reconstruct the acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular ligaments.

METHODS

Preoperative, immediate postoperative, and final follow-up oputcomes were evaluated in 10 enrolled patients. Radiographic outcomes were indicated by the bilateral difference of the coracoclavicular distance (CCD) and overlapping length of the acromioclavicular joint (OLac). Quality of reduction was classified into 4 grades according to bilateral CCD difference into overreduction (< 0 mm), anatomic reduction (0-4 mm), partial loss of reduction (4-8 mm), and recurrent dislocation (> 8 mm). Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) and Constant scores.

RESULTS

The mean side-to-side differences for CCD were 11.9 mm (preoperative), -0.1 mm (immediate postoperative), and 3.4 mm (final follow-up); those for OLac were 9.4 mm (preoperative) and 2.7 mm (final follow-up). CCD and OLac outcomes significantly improved at final follow-up ( < 0.05). At the immediate postoperative stage, 6 and 4 patients had overreduction and anatomic reduction, respectively. At final follow-up, 7 and 3 patients had anatomic reduction and partial loss of reduction, respectively. The magnitude of improvement of ASES scores for patients with anatomic reduction and partial loss of reduction ( = 0.20) was 18.1 and 20.0, respectively. The magnitude of improvement of Constant scores in patients with anatomic reduction and partial loss of reduction ( = 0.25) was 19.9 and 22.3, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The technique yielded acceptable functional outcomes in patients with anatomic reduction or partial loss of reduction. The "duo-figure-8" wrapping method-a single autogenic tendon graft passing beneath the coracoid process with a tendon-knot fixation over the distal clavicle and looping around the acromion intramedullary-did not increase the risk of peri-tunnel fractures over the clavicle, coracoid process, or acromion.

摘要

背景

喙锁韧带转位是治疗慢性肩锁关节分离的传统方法,但根据生物力学和临床研究,其效果明显不如韧带重建。然而,韧带重建存在移植物松动和隧道周围骨折等并发症的风险。目前,尚无预防此类并发症的最佳韧带重建方法。本研究旨在描述和回顾性分析一种“双 8 字”自体移植物包裹技术的临床和影像学结果,该技术用于同时重建肩锁关节和喙锁关节的韧带。

方法

对 10 例入组患者的术前、术后即刻和最终随访的结果进行评估。影像学结果通过双侧喙锁关节距离(CCD)的差异和肩锁关节重叠长度(OLac)来表示。根据双侧 CCD 差异,将复位质量分为 4 个等级,分为过度复位(<0 毫米)、解剖复位(0-4 毫米)、部分复位丢失(4-8 毫米)和复发性脱位(>8 毫米)。临床结果采用美国肩肘外科医生(ASES)和 Constant 评分进行评估。

结果

CCD 的平均侧侧差值分别为 11.9 毫米(术前)、-0.1 毫米(术后即刻)和 3.4 毫米(最终随访);OLac 的平均值分别为 9.4 毫米(术前)和 2.7 毫米(最终随访)。CCD 和 OLac 的结果在最终随访时均显著改善(<0.05)。术后即刻,6 例和 4 例分别为过度复位和解剖复位。最终随访时,7 例和 3 例分别为解剖复位和部分复位丢失。解剖复位和部分复位丢失患者 ASES 评分改善的幅度分别为 18.1 和 20.0(=0.20)。解剖复位和部分复位丢失患者 Constant 评分改善的幅度分别为 19.9 和 22.3(=0.25)。

结论

对于解剖复位或部分复位丢失的患者,该技术获得了可接受的功能结果。“双 8 字”包裹方法——一根自体肌腱穿过喙突下,肌腱结固定在锁骨远端,围绕肩峰髓内环——不会增加锁骨、喙突或肩峰隧道周围骨折的风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70e0/8380520/bf8b35592c6f/cios-13-366-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验