Suppr超能文献

头颈部癌患者胸部端口和胃造口管单期放置与两期放置的比较:装置相关早期感染率是否存在差异?

Single-session versus two-session placement of chest port and gastrostomy tube in patients with head and neck cancer: Is there any difference in the device-related early infection rates?

作者信息

Skummer Philip, Kobayashi Katsuhiro, Schoeneck Mason, Patel Jamynkumer, Faridnia Masoud

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.

Department of Radiology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA.

出版信息

Acta Radiol Open. 2021 Aug 29;10(8):20584601211037234. doi: 10.1177/20584601211037234. eCollection 2021 Aug.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

It is unknown whether placement of a chest port (port) and a gastrostomy tube (G-tube) in a single session increases the risk of the early device infections in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) undergoing chemoradiation.

PURPOSE

To compare the incidence of early (≤30 days) port and G-tube infections placed in a single session compared to two separate sessions in patients with HNC.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Between January 2012 and December 2019, 169 patients with HNC undergoing chemoradiation had a port and a G-tube placed in a single session (single-session group), while 25 had both devices placed in two separate sessions (two-session group) within 30 days of each other. The incidence of early device infections was compared between groups. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine if the number of sessions was a variable affecting device infections.

RESULTS

A total of 6 (3%) early port infections and 13 (6.7%) early G-tube infections were identified. The two groups did not significantly differ in the incidence of early port infections (3.0%, 5/169 and 4.0%, 1/25, = 0.59) nor early G-tube infections (7.1%, 12/169 and 4.0%, 1/25, = 1.0). The number of sessions for device placement was not a variable affecting overall device infections in logistic regression analyses (odds ratio: 1.24, 95% confidence interval: 0.20-7.82, = 0.82) after controlling for potential confounding variables.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of early device infections in single-session placement appeared to be the same as two-session placement in patients with HNC undergoing chemoradiation.

摘要

背景

对于接受放化疗的头颈癌(HNC)患者,在同一次手术中同时置入胸部端口(端口)和胃造口管(G管)是否会增加早期器械感染的风险尚不清楚。

目的

比较HNC患者在同一次手术中与分两次手术置入端口和G管的早期(≤30天)感染发生率。

材料与方法

2012年1月至2019年12月期间,169例接受放化疗的HNC患者在同一次手术中置入了端口和G管(单次手术组),而25例患者在彼此相隔30天内分两次手术置入了这两种器械(两次手术组)。比较两组早期器械感染的发生率。进行逻辑回归分析以确定手术次数是否是影响器械感染的变量。

结果

共发现6例(3%)早期端口感染和13例(6.7%)早期G管感染。两组在早期端口感染发生率(3.0%,5/169和4.0%,1/25,P = 0.59)和早期G管感染发生率(7.1%,12/169和4.0%,1/25,P = 1.0)方面无显著差异。在控制潜在混杂变量后,逻辑回归分析中器械置入的手术次数不是影响总体器械感染的变量(优势比:1.24,95%置信区间:0.20 - 7.82,P = 0.82)。

结论

对于接受放化疗的HNC患者,单次手术置入器械的早期感染风险似乎与两次手术置入相同。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9193/8408899/e2cb6dc9bb15/10.1177_20584601211037234-fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验