• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探索临床医生在知识发展中对最终用户角色的经验和看法:一项定性研究。

Exploring clinicians' experiences and perceptions of end-user roles in knowledge development: a qualitative study.

机构信息

Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, ON, Canada.

Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, ON, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Sep 6;21(1):926. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06955-7.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-021-06955-7
PMID:34488751
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8420847/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

End-user involvement in developing evidence-based tools for clinical practice may result in increased uptake and improved patient outcomes. Understanding end-user experiences and perceptions about the co-production of knowledge is useful to further the science of integrated knowledge translation (iKT) - a strategy for accelerating the uptake and impact of research. Our study had two main objectives: (1) explore end-user (clinician) experiences of co-producing an evidence-based practice tool; and (2) describe end-user perceptions in knowledge development.

METHODS

We used a qualitative study design. We conducted semi-structured interviews with clinicians and used a transcendental phenomenological approach to analyze themes/phenomena. In addition, we explored the interrelated themes between the thematic maps of each objective.

RESULTS

Four themes emerged from clinicians' experiences in co-producing the practice tool: ease/convenience of participating, need for support and encouragement, understanding the value of participating, and individual skillsets yield meaningful contributions. Stakeholder roles in knowledge tool development and improving dissemination of evidence and knowledge tools were themes that related to clinician perceptions in knowledge development. The review of interrelated thematic maps depicts an intertwined relationship between stakeholders and dissemination.

CONCLUSIONS

End-users provide invaluable insight and perspective into the development of evidence-based clinical tools. Exploring the experiences and perceptions of end-users may support future research endeavours involving iKT, such as the co-production of clinical resources, potentially improving uptake and patient health outcomes.

摘要

背景

终端用户参与开发基于证据的临床实践工具可能会增加采用率并改善患者的预后。了解终端用户对知识共同生产的经验和看法有助于进一步推动综合知识转化(iKT)的科学发展,这是一种加速研究采用和影响的策略。我们的研究有两个主要目标:(1)探索终端用户(临床医生)共同开发基于证据的实践工具的经验;(2)描述知识开发中的终端用户感知。

方法

我们使用了定性研究设计。我们对临床医生进行了半结构化访谈,并采用了先验现象学方法来分析主题/现象。此外,我们还探讨了每个目标的主题地图之间的相互关联的主题。

结果

临床医生在共同开发实践工具方面的经验中出现了四个主题:参与的方便性/便利性、需要支持和鼓励、理解参与的价值、以及个人技能集产生有意义的贡献。利益相关者在知识工具开发中的角色以及改进证据和知识工具的传播是与临床医生在知识开发中的感知相关的主题。相关主题地图的审查描绘了利益相关者和传播之间的交织关系。

结论

终端用户为开发基于证据的临床工具提供了宝贵的见解和观点。探索终端用户的经验和看法可能会支持涉及 iKT 的未来研究工作,例如共同开发临床资源,从而有可能提高采用率并改善患者的健康结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e652/8422695/425897f19033/12913_2021_6955_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e652/8422695/356a02c43183/12913_2021_6955_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e652/8422695/8fc7a454a202/12913_2021_6955_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e652/8422695/35e6a3dc79a9/12913_2021_6955_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e652/8422695/425897f19033/12913_2021_6955_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e652/8422695/356a02c43183/12913_2021_6955_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e652/8422695/8fc7a454a202/12913_2021_6955_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e652/8422695/35e6a3dc79a9/12913_2021_6955_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e652/8422695/425897f19033/12913_2021_6955_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Exploring clinicians' experiences and perceptions of end-user roles in knowledge development: a qualitative study.探索临床医生在知识发展中对最终用户角色的经验和看法:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Sep 6;21(1):926. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06955-7.
2
Exploring clinician perceptions of a care pathway for the management of shoulder pain: a qualitative study.探索临床医生对肩部疼痛管理护理路径的看法:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 May 25;22(1):702. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07999-z.
3
A mixed-methods approach to understanding partnership experiences and outcomes of projects from an integrated knowledge translation funding model in rehabilitation.一种采用混合方法的途径,以理解来自康复领域综合知识转化资助模式的项目的伙伴关系经验及成果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Apr 16;19(1):230. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4061-x.
4
Using integrated knowledge translation to address a rurally based time-critical knowledge gap during the COVID-19 pandemic: a multimethods study in Victoria, Australia.利用综合知识转化来解决 COVID-19 大流行期间农村地区的时间紧迫知识差距:澳大利亚维多利亚州的一项多方法研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 29;13(10):e075926. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075926.
5
"Exploring knowledge-user experiences in integrated knowledge translation: a biomedical investigation of the causes and consequences of food allergy".探索综合知识转化中的知识使用者体验:食物过敏因果关系的生物医学调查
Res Involv Engagem. 2016 Sep 1;2:27. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0043-x. eCollection 2016.
6
A qualitative study on clinicians' perceptions about the implementation of a population risk stratification tool in primary care practice of the Basque health service.关于临床医生对在巴斯克卫生服务机构基层医疗实践中实施人群风险分层工具的看法的定性研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2014 Sep 8;15:150. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-15-150.
7
The meaning of co-production for clinicians: An exploratory case study of Practitioner Trainers in one Recovery College.共同生产对临床医生的意义:对一所康复学院中从业者培训师的探索性案例研究。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2018 Jun;25(5-6):349-357. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12469.
8
How does integrated knowledge translation (IKT) compare to other collaborative research approaches to generating and translating knowledge? Learning from experts in the field.综合知识转化(IKT)与其他协作研究方法在生成和转化知识方面有何不同?向该领域的专家学习。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Mar 30;18(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-0539-6.
9
The value of hackathons in integrated knowledge translation (iKT) research: Waterlupus.黑客松在综合知识转化(iKT)研究中的价值:Waterlupus。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2021 Nov 24;19(1):138. doi: 10.1186/s12961-021-00785-z.
10
Integrated knowledge translation guidelines for trainees in health research: an environmental scan.健康研究培训生综合知识转化指南:环境扫描
Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 Jul 14;21(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-01024-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Moving Beyond the Checklist-An Enhanced Approach to Context-Driven Overuse Injury Prevention in Overhead Youth Athletes.超越清单——一种针对青少年上肢运动员情境驱动的过度使用损伤预防的强化方法。
J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 3;14(3):971. doi: 10.3390/jcm14030971.
2
Using the consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to integrate innovation recipients' perspectives into the implementation of a digital version of the spinal cord injury health maintenance tool: a qualitative analysis.利用整合实施研究框架将创新接受者的观点纳入脊髓损伤健康维护工具数字版本的实施中:定性分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Mar 28;24(1):390. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10847-x.
3

本文引用的文献

1
COVID-19 Impacts Mental Health Outcomes and Ability/Desire to Participate in Research Among Current Research Participants.COVID-19 对当前研究参与者的心理健康结果和参与研究的能力/意愿产生影响。
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2020 Dec;28(12):2272-2281. doi: 10.1002/oby.23016. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
2
A simple method to assess and report thematic saturation in qualitative research.一种评估和报告定性研究主题饱和度的简单方法。
PLoS One. 2020 May 5;15(5):e0232076. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232076. eCollection 2020.
3
Knowledge translation in health: how implementation science could contribute more.
Development of a Website for a Living Network Meta-analysis of Atopic Dermatitis Treatments Using a User-Centered Design: Multimethod Study.
使用以用户为中心的设计开发一个用于特应性皮炎治疗的生存网络荟萃分析的网站:多方法研究。
JMIR Dermatol. 2022 Sep 26;5(3):e41201. doi: 10.2196/41201.
4
Exploring clinician perceptions of a care pathway for the management of shoulder pain: a qualitative study.探索临床医生对肩部疼痛管理护理路径的看法:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 May 25;22(1):702. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07999-z.
健康知识转化:实施科学如何做出更多贡献
BMC Med. 2019 May 7;17(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1322-9.
4
A mixed-methods approach to understanding partnership experiences and outcomes of projects from an integrated knowledge translation funding model in rehabilitation.一种采用混合方法的途径,以理解来自康复领域综合知识转化资助模式的项目的伙伴关系经验及成果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Apr 16;19(1):230. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4061-x.
5
How phenomenology can help us learn from the experiences of others.现象学如何帮助我们从他人的经验中学习。
Perspect Med Educ. 2019 Apr;8(2):90-97. doi: 10.1007/s40037-019-0509-2.
6
Building a Bridge to the Community: An Integrated Knowledge Translation Approach to Improving Participation in Community-Based Exercise for People After Stroke.搭建通往社区的桥梁:一种综合知识转化方法,旨在提高社区运动对中风后人群的参与度。
Phys Ther. 2019 Mar 1;99(3):286-296. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzy146.
7
Twelve tips for conducting qualitative research interviews.进行定性研究访谈的 12 个技巧。
Med Teach. 2019 Sep;41(9):1002-1006. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1497149. Epub 2018 Sep 28.
8
Strengthening stakeholder-engaged research and research on stakeholder engagement.加强利益相关者参与的研究以及关于利益相关者参与的研究。
J Comp Eff Res. 2017 Jun;6(4):375-389. doi: 10.2217/cer-2016-0096. Epub 2017 Jun 16.
9
To adopt, to adapt, or to contextualise? The big question in clinical practice guideline development.采用、改编还是因地制宜?临床实践指南制定中的重大问题。
BMC Res Notes. 2016 Sep 13;9(1):442. doi: 10.1186/s13104-016-2244-7.
10
Member Checking: A Tool to Enhance Trustworthiness or Merely a Nod to Validation?成员核对:一种增强可信度的工具还是仅仅是对验证的认可?
Qual Health Res. 2016 Nov;26(13):1802-1811. doi: 10.1177/1049732316654870. Epub 2016 Jul 10.