Indiana University School of Medicine, 473 Barnhill Drive, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA; Indiana University Simon Cancer Center, 473 Barnhill Drive, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
Indiana University Health, 473 Barnhill Drive, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA; Indiana University Medical Library, 473 Barnhill Drive, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
Patient Educ Couns. 2022 May;105(5):1138-1151. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.08.016. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
Goals-of-care communication (GOCC) is recommended to increase the value of cancer care near the end of life (EOL).
Conduct a systematic review of the evidence that GOCC is associated with higher-value care.
We searched PubMed, Scopus, Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, EMB Reviews, CINAHL, and PsycInfo from inception to July 2019. We analyzed the population,design, and results and the authors' definitions of GOCC. Risk of bias was assessed.
Thirty-two articles were selected. Ten articles reported results from 8 interventions; 17 characterized participants' perspectives; and 5 were retrospective The topics, behaviors, timing, and anticipated outcomes of GOCC varied significantly and were indistinguishable from practices such as advance care planning. GOCC typically focused on treatment outcomes rather than patients' goals. Four of 5 interventions increased evidence of GOCC after clinician training. Only one reported improved patient outcomes.
No consensus exists about what GOCC entails. There is limited evidence that GOCC increases the value of EOL care.
Future studies should focus on how to engage patients in conversations about their personal goals and integrate their goals into care planning. Clinicians can encourage GOCC by explaining how patients' goals influence decisions especially as treatment options become limited.
临终关怀沟通(GOCC)被推荐用于提高生命末期(EOL)癌症护理的价值。
系统评价 GOCC 与更高价值护理相关的证据。
我们从开始到 2019 年 7 月在 PubMed、Scopus、Ovid MEDLINE、EMBASE、EMB Reviews、CINAHL 和 PsycInfo 上进行了搜索。我们分析了人群、设计和结果以及作者对 GOCC 的定义。评估了偏倚风险。
选择了 32 篇文章。10 篇文章报告了 8 项干预措施的结果;17 篇描述了参与者的观点;5 篇是回顾性的。GOCC 的主题、行为、时间和预期结果差异很大,与预先护理计划等实践无法区分。GOCC 通常侧重于治疗结果,而不是患者的目标。5 项干预措施中的 4 项在临床医生培训后增加了 GOCC 的证据。只有一项报告改善了患者的结局。
关于 GOCC 包含什么内容,目前尚无共识。有限的证据表明,GOCC 增加了 EOL 护理的价值。
未来的研究应集中在如何让患者参与关于个人目标的对话,并将其目标纳入护理计划。临床医生可以通过解释患者的目标如何影响决策,特别是当治疗选择变得有限时,来鼓励进行 GOCC。