Klatt Maryanna, Bawa Rani, Gabram Olivia, Westrick Alexis, Blake Amanda
Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.
Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 18;12:725810. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.725810. eCollection 2021.
Mindfulness in Motion (MIM) is an organizationally-sponsored mindfulness program for employees at a large academic health center that consistently produces significant reductions in burnout and perceived stress, alongside significant increases in work engagement and resilience. This study compared outcome measures of a synchronous virtual delivery of MIM, necessitated by COVID-19, to traditional in-person delivery of MIM. Outcome measures from the virtual COVID (AU20, WI21, SP21) MIM cohorts ( = 99) were compared with the in-person Pre-COVID (SP19, AU19, WI20) MIM cohorts ( = 124). Both Pre-COVID and COVID cohorts had similar attendance rates with an average attendance of 84 and 80%, respectively. Qualitative analysis of COVID cohorts reported community support during COVID as a substantial intervention benefit, which was important at a time when isolation dominated the healthcare professional experience. Total burnout was determined by scores on the subscales of the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI). There were no significant differences in depersonalization ( = 0.3876) and personal accomplishment ( = 0.1519) changes between Pre-COVID and COVID cohorts, however there was a significant difference in emotional exhaustion ( = 0.0315), with COVID cohorts improving more. In both Pre, and COVID cohorts, the percentage of people meeting burnout criteria from pre to post between groups were similar, yielding a non-significant difference ( = 0.2950). The Connor Davidson Resiliency Scale (CDRS) and Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES) also produced no significant differences between groups ( = 0.4259, = 0.1984, respectively). The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) though yielded significant differences in reduction between groups ( = 0.0405), again with COVID cohorts showing greater improvement. Results of the first synchronous, virtually delivered MIM cohorts reflect that participants achieved very similar results and that MIM created a community in a time when it was greatly needed due to pandemic healthcare professional stress.
“运动中的正念”（MIM）是一个由大型学术健康中心为员工组织开展的正念项目，该项目持续显著降低了职业倦怠和感知到的压力，同时大幅提高了工作投入度和恢复力。本研究将因新冠疫情而采用的同步虚拟形式开展的MIM项目的结果指标，与传统的面对面形式开展的MIM项目进行了比较。将虚拟形式的新冠疫情期间（AU20、WI21、SP21）MIM群组（n = 99）的结果指标，与新冠疫情前（SP19、AU19、WI20）面对面形式的MIM群组（n = 124）进行了比较。新冠疫情前和疫情期间的群组出席率相似，平均出席率分别为84%和80%。对疫情期间群组的定性分析表明，疫情期间的社区支持是一项重要的干预益处，在隔离主导医护人员体验的时期，这一点很重要。总体职业倦怠由马氏职业倦怠量表（MBI）各子量表的得分确定。新冠疫情前和疫情期间的群组在去个性化（p = 0.3876）和个人成就感（p = 0.1519）变化方面没有显著差异，然而在情感耗竭方面存在显著差异（p = 0.0315），疫情期间的群组改善得更多。在新冠疫情前和疫情期间的群组中，两组之间从之前到之后达到职业倦怠标准的人员百分比相似，差异不显著（p = 0.2950）。康纳·戴维森复原力量表（CDRS）和乌得勒支工作投入量表（UWES）在两组之间也没有产生显著差异（分别为p = 0.4259、p = 0.1984）。感知压力量表（PSS）在两组之间的降低幅度上产生了显著差异（p = 0.0405），同样是疫情期间的群组改善得更明显。首个同步虚拟形式开展的MIM群组的结果表明，参与者取得了非常相似的结果，并且在因疫情导致医护人员压力巨大而急需的时候，MIM营造了一个社区。
