Luukkonen P, Järvinen H
Second Department of Surgery, University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Ann Chir Gynaecol. 1987;76(6):294-7.
In order to examine the possible effect of different pouch shape to the capacity of ileal reservoirs three different types of pelvic ileal reservoir (2-, 3- and 4-loop) were compared in piglets, with four animals in each group. The intraoperative volume of all of these reservoirs was 55 ml, measured with saline. A larger (110 ml) 2-loop reservoir was used in a control group of four animals. The animals were kept alive for 6 weeks after which time the capacity and emptying of the reservoirs were studied. The resulting volume increases (ml/kg) were 15.4, 9.2, 8.9 and 8.1 in J-, S-, large-J- and W-shaped reservoirs, respectively. The emptying of the reservoirs was incomplete in all designs. No statistical difference (P greater than 0.5) was found between groups for either of these parameters. If resistance to outflow from the pouch can be avoided, the capacity of the reservoir seems to depend more on its initial size at the time of construction than on the pouch design.
为了研究不同储袋形状对回肠储袋容量的可能影响,在仔猪中比较了三种不同类型的盆腔回肠储袋(2袢、3袢和4袢),每组4只动物。所有这些储袋的术中容量均为55毫升,用生理盐水测量。在4只动物的对照组中使用了一个更大的(110毫升)2袢储袋。动物存活6周后,研究储袋的容量和排空情况。J形、S形、大J形和W形储袋的容量增加量(毫升/千克)分别为15.4、9.2、8.9和8.1。所有设计的储袋排空均不完全。在这些参数的任何一项上,各组之间均未发现统计学差异(P大于0.5)。如果能够避免储袋流出阻力,储袋的容量似乎更多地取决于其构建时的初始大小,而不是储袋设计。