Sleep Disorders Center, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Neurology Unit, Department of General Medicine, Parma University Hospital, Parma, Italy.
Neurol Sci. 2022 Mar;43(3):2003-2013. doi: 10.1007/s10072-021-05572-w. Epub 2021 Sep 6.
The official variations of status epilepticus (SE) International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE, 2015) diagnostic criteria and the non-convulsive SE (NCSE) Salzburg Consensus Criteria (2013), impose the collection of updated population-based epidemiological Italian data. In this study, we aimed at evaluating (a) the frequency of SE in our hospital adopting the new ILAE 2015 SE diagnostic criteria and NCSE Salzburg Consensus Criteria, (b) the frequency of adherence to current treatment guidelines for SE and their relationship with patients' outcome, and (c) reliability of standardized prognostic scales (Status Epilepticus Severity Score-STESS-and modified STESS) for short-term outcome prediction in the setting of the newest diagnostic criteria for SE and NCSE. Detailed clinical and electrophysiological data collected in a 1-year retrospective hospital-based single-center survey on SE at Parma Hospital, Northern Italy are provided. Non-adherence to current treatment guidelines was recorded in around 50% cases, but no relation to outcome was appreciated. Mortality in our cohort increased from 30 to 50% when follow-up was extended to 30 days. STESS score was strongly correlated with short-term mortality risk (OR 18.9, 2.2-163.5, CI), and we confirm its role as easy-to-use tool for outcome evaluation also when the new ILAE diagnostic SE criteria are applied.
国际抗癫痫联盟(ILAE)2015 年发布的癫痫持续状态(SE)官方分类标准和非惊厥性 SE(NCSE)萨尔斯堡共识标准(2013 年)要求收集最新的基于人群的意大利流行病学数据。在本研究中,我们旨在评估:(a)采用新的 ILAE 2015 年 SE 诊断标准和 NCSE 萨尔斯堡共识标准后,我院 SE 的发病率;(b)SE 现行治疗指南的遵循率及其与患者预后的关系;(c)在 SE 和 NCSE 的最新诊断标准下,标准化预后量表(癫痫持续状态严重程度评分-STESS 和改良 STESS)用于短期预后预测的可靠性。提供了意大利北部帕尔马医院为期 1 年的 SE 回顾性基于医院的单中心调查中收集的详细临床和电生理数据。约 50%的病例未遵循现行治疗指南,但未观察到与预后的关系。当随访时间延长至 30 天时,我们队列中的死亡率从 30%增加到 50%。STESS 评分与短期死亡率风险密切相关(OR 18.9,2.2-163.5,CI),我们确认其作为评估预后的有用工具的作用,即使在应用新的 ILAE SE 诊断标准时也是如此。