• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会网络对年轻女性选择使用长效可逆避孕措施的影响:系统评价。

Social Network Influences on Young Women's Choice to Use Long-Acting Reversible Contraception: A Systematic Review.

机构信息

College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida.

出版信息

J Midwifery Womens Health. 2021 Nov;66(6):758-771. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13280. Epub 2021 Sep 7.

DOI:10.1111/jmwh.13280
PMID:34491002
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Long-acting reversible contraception (LARC; including intrauterine devices and implants) is recommended as the first-line contraceptive choice by several professional organizations (eg, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists); however, rates of uptake are lower than those of other contraceptive methods. A young woman's social network may influence the decision to use LARC. The purpose of this review was to determine the role of health care providers (HCPs), family, peers, and sexual partner(s) on young women's decisions to initiate LARC.

METHODS

Several databases (PubMed, CINAHL, and PsycINFO) were searched for articles published between 2000 and 2020 that studied the social network influences of HCPs, family, peers, and sexual partner(s) on LARC initiation among women in the United States aged 18 to 25. A narrative synthesis of the included articles was conducted.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine articles met the inclusion criteria (21 qualitative, 6 quantitative, 2 mixed methods). HCPs are an important influence on a young woman's LARC decision-making. Peers and family also have a role but were often sources of negative or inaccurate information. Gaps in the literature were identified, including a lack of data on implant users and a dearth of studies on the role of sexual partner influence; most studies were not guided by theory.

DISCUSSION

HCPs are integral to LARC initiation and may be more influential than other social network members. Future research should focus on understanding how social network members interact to result in LARC initiation. Gaining insight into these influences may improve existing interventions or contribute to the development of new interventions and ultimately promote LARC use among young women.

摘要

简介

长效可逆避孕方法(LARC;包括宫内节育器和植入物)被多个专业组织(例如,美国妇产科医师学会)推荐为首选避孕方法;然而,其使用率低于其他避孕方法。年轻女性的社交网络可能会影响其使用 LARC 的决定。本综述旨在确定医疗保健提供者(HCPs)、家庭、同龄人以及性伴侣对年轻女性开始使用 LARC 的决策的影响。

方法

检索了 2000 年至 2020 年期间发表的研究美国 18 至 25 岁女性的 HCPs、家庭、同龄人以及性伴侣对 LARC 起始影响的社交网络的文章,数据库包括 PubMed、CINAHL 和 PsycINFO。对纳入的文章进行了叙述性综合。

结果

29 篇文章符合纳入标准(21 篇定性研究、6 篇定量研究、2 篇混合方法研究)。HCPs 是年轻女性 LARC 决策的重要影响因素。同龄人及家庭也有一定作用,但往往提供的是负面或不准确的信息。文献中存在一些空白,包括缺乏关于植入物使用者的数据以及缺乏关于性伴侣影响的研究;大多数研究没有理论指导。

讨论

HCPs 是 LARC 起始的重要组成部分,其影响力可能大于其他社交网络成员。未来的研究应重点了解社交网络成员如何相互作用以促使 LARC 起始。深入了解这些影响因素可能会改进现有的干预措施或有助于新干预措施的开发,并最终促进年轻女性使用 LARC。

相似文献

1
Social Network Influences on Young Women's Choice to Use Long-Acting Reversible Contraception: A Systematic Review.社会网络对年轻女性选择使用长效可逆避孕措施的影响:系统评价。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2021 Nov;66(6):758-771. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13280. Epub 2021 Sep 7.
2
Immediate versus delayed postpartum insertion of contraceptive implant and IUD for contraception.即刻与产后延迟放置避孕埋植剂和宫内节育器避孕效果比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 27;10(10):CD011913. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011913.pub3.
3
Postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device use and its associated factors in Ethiopia: systematic review and meta-analysis.埃塞俄比亚产后宫内节育器使用及其相关因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Reprod Health. 2021 Nov 13;18(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01273-x.
4
Education for contraceptive use by women after childbirth.产后妇女避孕使用教育。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002(3):CD001863. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001863.
5
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.干预健康从业者与受影响者之间关于临终关怀的人际沟通。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2.
6
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
7
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
8
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
9
Effects of consumers and health providers working in partnership on health services planning, delivery and evaluation.消费者和医疗服务提供者合作对卫生服务规划、提供和评估的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 15;9(9):CD013373. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013373.pub2.
10
Immediate postabortal insertion of intrauterine devices.流产后立即放置宫内节育器。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002(3):CD001777. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001777.

引用本文的文献

1
The influence of familial networks and stigma on prison-based medication initiation for individuals with opioid use disorder: Clinicians' perceptions.家族网络和污名对阿片类药物使用障碍患者入监药物治疗起始的影响:临床医生的看法。
J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2024 Jul;162:209353. doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2024.209353. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
2
Contraceptive content shared on social media: an analysis of Twitter.社交媒体上分享的避孕内容:推特分析
Contracept Reprod Med. 2024 Feb 7;9(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s40834-024-00262-2.
3
Trusted contraception information sources for individuals with opioid use disorder.
可信的避孕信息来源:针对阿片类药物使用障碍者
Health Serv Res. 2022 Dec;57(6):1390-1395. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14075. Epub 2022 Oct 10.
4
Community-based Systems Dynamics for Reproductive Health: An Example from Urban Ohio.基于社区的生殖健康系统动力学:俄亥俄州城市的一个实例。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2022;16(3):361-383. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2022.0053.