• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

衡量有意义的获益-风险权衡以促进普拉德-威利综合征以患者为中心的药物开发:一项离散选择实验

Measuring Meaningful Benefit-Risk Tradeoffs to Promote Patient-Focused Drug Development in Prader-Willi Syndrome: A Discrete-Choice Experiment.

作者信息

Tsai Jui-Hua, Crossnohere Norah L, Strong Theresa, Bridges John F P

机构信息

Pharmerit International, Bethesda, Maryland.

Department of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio.

出版信息

MDM Policy Pract. 2021 Sep 2;6(2):23814683211039457. doi: 10.1177/23814683211039457. eCollection 2021 Jul-Dec.

DOI:10.1177/23814683211039457
PMID:34497876
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8419554/
Abstract

Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) is a rare neurodevelopmental disorder causing quality of life impairments such as insatiable hunger (hyperphagia) and obesity. We explored caregivers' willingness to assume treatment risk in exchange for reduced hyperphagia according to a PWS-validated observer-reported outcome measure. We partnered with PWS patient organizations to develop a discrete-choice experiment exploring caregivers' benefit-risk tradeoffs for emerging PWS treatments. The treatment benefit was a reduction in hyperphagia (as measured by a 0-, 5-, or 10-point change on the Hyperphagia Questionnaire for Clinical Trials [HQ-CT]). Treatment risks included weight gain (none, 5%, 10%), added risk of skin rash (none, 10%, 20%), and risk of liver damage (none, 1 in 1000, 10 in 1000). Preference models were estimated using mixed logistic regression and maximum acceptable risk. We explored differences in preferences across familial caregivers of patients with and without hyperphagia. Four hundred sixty-eight caregivers completed the online survey. The majority of caregivers reported that patients experienced hyperphagia (68%) and half of patients experienced obesity (52%). Caregivers of patients without hyperphagia were willing to accept greater weight gain (16.4% v. 8.1%, = 0.004) and a higher risk of skin rash (11.7% v. 6.2% = 0.008) as compared to caregivers of patients with hyperphagia. Caregivers of patients with hyperphagia would accept a higher risk of liver damage as compared to caregivers of patients without hyperphagia (11.9 out of 1000 v. 6.4 out of 1000, = 0.04). This research demonstrates that caregivers are willing to accept risk in exchange for a five-point improvement on the HQ-CT, a smaller marginal improvement than had been previously classified as meaningful. Patient experience with hyperphagia is a modifier in how much risk caregivers will accept.

摘要

普拉德-威利综合征(PWS)是一种罕见的神经发育障碍,会导致生活质量受损,如无法满足的饥饿感(食欲亢进)和肥胖。我们根据一项经PWS验证的观察者报告结局指标,探讨了照料者为换取食欲亢进减轻而承担治疗风险的意愿。我们与PWS患者组织合作开展了一项离散选择实验,以探究照料者对新兴PWS治疗方法的利弊权衡。治疗益处是食欲亢进减轻(通过临床试验用食欲亢进问卷[HQ-CT]上0分、5分或10分的变化来衡量)。治疗风险包括体重增加(无、5%、10%)、皮疹风险增加(无、10%、20%)以及肝损伤风险(无、千分之一、千分之十)。使用混合逻辑回归和最大可接受风险估计偏好模型。我们探讨了有食欲亢进和无食欲亢进患者的家庭照料者在偏好上的差异。468名照料者完成了在线调查。大多数照料者报告称患者有食欲亢进(68%),一半患者有肥胖(52%)。与有食欲亢进患者的照料者相比,无食欲亢进患者的照料者愿意接受更大的体重增加风险(16.4%对8.1%,P = 0.004)和更高的皮疹风险(11.7%对6.2%,P = 0.008)。与无食欲亢进患者的照料者相比,有食欲亢进患者的照料者愿意接受更高的肝损伤风险(千分之11.9对千分之6.4,P = 0.04)。这项研究表明,照料者愿意接受风险,以换取HQ-CT上五分的改善,这一微小的边际改善低于先前被归类为有意义的程度。患者的食欲亢进经历是照料者愿意接受多少风险的一个调节因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fb5/8419554/23f8f8da8d73/10.1177_23814683211039457-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fb5/8419554/b84dd828adde/10.1177_23814683211039457-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fb5/8419554/5379c9a0088e/10.1177_23814683211039457-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fb5/8419554/23f8f8da8d73/10.1177_23814683211039457-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fb5/8419554/b84dd828adde/10.1177_23814683211039457-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fb5/8419554/5379c9a0088e/10.1177_23814683211039457-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fb5/8419554/23f8f8da8d73/10.1177_23814683211039457-fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Measuring Meaningful Benefit-Risk Tradeoffs to Promote Patient-Focused Drug Development in Prader-Willi Syndrome: A Discrete-Choice Experiment.衡量有意义的获益-风险权衡以促进普拉德-威利综合征以患者为中心的药物开发:一项离散选择实验
MDM Policy Pract. 2021 Sep 2;6(2):23814683211039457. doi: 10.1177/23814683211039457. eCollection 2021 Jul-Dec.
2
Characteristics and relationship between hyperphagia, anxiety, behavioral challenges and caregiver burden in Prader-Willi syndrome.贪食症、焦虑、行为挑战与 Prader-Willi 综合征患者照料者负担的特征及其相关性。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 25;16(3):e0248739. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248739. eCollection 2021.
3
Quantifying the Burden of Hyperphagia in Prader-Willi Syndrome Using Quality-Adjusted Life-years.用质量调整生命年来量化普拉德-威利综合征患者的过食症负担。
Clin Ther. 2021 Jul;43(7):1164-1178.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2021.05.013. Epub 2021 Jun 27.
4
Caregiver priorities for endpoints to evaluate treatments for Prader-Willi syndrome: a best-worst scaling.普拉德-威利综合征治疗评估终点的照护者优先事项:最佳-最差标度法
J Med Econ. 2018 Dec;21(12):1230-1237. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2018.1528980. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
5
Analysis of Hyperphagia Questionnaire for Clinical Trials (HQ-CT) scores in typically developing individuals and those with Prader-Willi syndrome.分析典型发育个体和普拉德-威利综合征患者的临床试验性暴食问卷(HQ-CT)评分。
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 23;13(1):20573. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-48024-5.
6
Current and emerging therapies for managing hyperphagia and obesity in Prader-Willi syndrome: A narrative review.用于治疗普拉德-威利综合征患者过食和肥胖的现有和新兴疗法:叙述性综述。
Obes Rev. 2020 May;21(5):e12992. doi: 10.1111/obr.12992. Epub 2019 Dec 30.
7
Transcranial direct current stimulation reduces food-craving and measures of hyperphagia behavior in participants with Prader-Willi syndrome.经颅直流电刺激可减少普拉德-威利综合征患者的食物渴望及贪食行为指标。
Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2016 Mar;171B(2):266-75. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.b.32401. Epub 2015 Nov 21.
8
Development and validation of the Pediatric-Youth Hyperphagia Assessment for Prader-Willi syndrome.Prader-Willi 综合征儿童青少年暴食评估的制定与验证。
Epidemiol Health. 2022;44:e2022014. doi: 10.4178/epih.e2022014. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
9
A review of chemosensory perceptions, food preferences and food-related behaviours in subjects with Prader-Willi Syndrome.普拉德-威利综合征患者的化学感觉、食物偏好及与食物相关行为综述。
Appetite. 2016 Apr 1;99:17-24. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.12.021. Epub 2015 Dec 20.
10
Specificity of Early Childhood Hyperphagia Profiles in Neurogenetic Conditions.神经发育障碍相关儿童早期过度进食特征的特异性。
Am J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2024 May 1;129(3):175-190. doi: 10.1352/1944-7558-129.3.175.

引用本文的文献

1
The Evolving Landscape of Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Systematic Review.健康经济学中离散选择实验的发展态势:一项系统综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 May 21. doi: 10.1007/s40273-025-01495-y.
2
Pharmacological Aspects in the Management of Children and Adolescents with Prader-Willi Syndrome.普拉德-威利综合征患儿及青少年管理中的药理学方面
Paediatr Drugs. 2025 May;27(3):273-281. doi: 10.1007/s40272-025-00681-x. Epub 2025 Jan 28.
3
Acceptability of linking individual credit, financial, and public records data to healthcare records for suicide risk machine learning models.

本文引用的文献

1
Quantifying the Burden of Hyperphagia in Prader-Willi Syndrome Using Quality-Adjusted Life-years.用质量调整生命年来量化普拉德-威利综合征患者的过食症负担。
Clin Ther. 2021 Jul;43(7):1164-1178.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2021.05.013. Epub 2021 Jun 27.
2
Comparing the Preferences of Patients and the General Public for Treatment Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.比较 2 型糖尿病患者和普通公众对治疗结局的偏好。
Patient. 2021 Jan;14(1):89-100. doi: 10.1007/s40271-020-00450-7.
3
The evolution of patient-focused drug development and Duchenne muscular dystrophy.
将个人信用、金融和公共记录数据与医疗记录相链接用于自杀风险机器学习模型的可接受性。
JAMIA Open. 2024 Oct 21;7(4):ooae113. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae113. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
Preferences for Neurodevelopmental Follow-Up Care for Children: A Discrete Choice Experiment.儿童神经发育随访护理偏好的离散选择实验
Patient. 2024 Nov;17(6):645-662. doi: 10.1007/s40271-024-00717-3. Epub 2024 Aug 29.
5
Using stated preference methods to facilitate knowledge translation in implementation science.运用陈述性偏好方法促进实施科学中的知识转化。
Implement Sci Commun. 2024 Mar 28;5(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s43058-024-00554-3.
6
Involving patients in drug development for Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs): A qualitative study exploring and incorporating preferences of patients with cutaneous leishmaniasis into Target Product Profile development.参与被忽视热带病药物研发:一项探索和纳入皮肤利什曼病患者偏好的定性研究,以纳入目标产品特性开发。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2024 Feb 21;18(2):e0011975. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011975. eCollection 2024 Feb.
7
Preferences in the Design and Delivery of Neurodevelopmental Follow-Up Care for Children: A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments.儿童神经发育随访护理设计与提供中的偏好:离散选择实验的系统评价
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2023 Sep 19;17:2325-2341. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S425578. eCollection 2023.
8
A Comparison of Caregiver and Patient Preferences for Treating Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.照料者和患者对治疗杜氏肌营养不良症的偏好比较。
Patient. 2022 Sep;15(5):577-588. doi: 10.1007/s40271-022-00574-y. Epub 2022 Mar 4.
以患者为中心的药物研发与杜氏肌营养不良症的发展。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2020 Feb;20(1):57-68. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2020.1734454. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
4
Current and emerging therapies for managing hyperphagia and obesity in Prader-Willi syndrome: A narrative review.用于治疗普拉德-威利综合征患者过食和肥胖的现有和新兴疗法:叙述性综述。
Obes Rev. 2020 May;21(5):e12992. doi: 10.1111/obr.12992. Epub 2019 Dec 30.
5
Clarifying the Meaning of Clinically Meaningful Benefit in Clinical Research: Noticeable Change vs Valuable Change.明确临床研究中具有临床意义的获益的含义:显著变化与有价值的变化。
JAMA. 2019 Dec 24;322(24):2381-2382. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.18496.
6
How Do Members of the Duchenne and Becker Muscular Dystrophy Community Perceive a Discrete-Choice Experiment Incorporating Uncertain Treatment Benefit? An Application of Research as an Event.杜氏和贝克肌营养不良症社群成员如何看待纳入不确定治疗获益的离散选择实验?以事件为研究的应用。
Patient. 2019 Apr;12(2):247-257. doi: 10.1007/s40271-018-0330-8.
7
Caregiver priorities for endpoints to evaluate treatments for Prader-Willi syndrome: a best-worst scaling.普拉德-威利综合征治疗评估终点的照护者优先事项:最佳-最差标度法
J Med Econ. 2018 Dec;21(12):1230-1237. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2018.1528980. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
8
High levels of caregiver burden in Prader-Willi syndrome.照料者负担过重与普拉德-威利综合征相关。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 26;13(3):e0194655. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194655. eCollection 2018.
9
Eye Tracking as a Marker of Hyperphagia in Prader-Willi Syndrome.眼动追踪作为普拉德-威利综合征中贪食症的一个指标
Dev Neuropsychol. 2018;43(2):152-161. doi: 10.1080/87565641.2017.1367395. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
10
Medication Trials for Hyperphagia and Food-Related Behaviors in Prader-Willi Syndrome.普拉德-威利综合征中贪食及与食物相关行为的药物试验
Diseases. 2015 Jun 3;3(2):78-85. doi: 10.3390/diseases3020078.