Norris Emma, Wright Alison J, Hastings Janna, West Robert, Boyt Neil, Michie Susan
Health Behaviour Change Research Group, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, UB8 3PH, UK.
Centre for Behaviour Change, University College London, London, WC1E 7HB, UK.
Wellcome Open Res. 2021 Apr 8;6:77. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16682.1. eCollection 2021.
Identifying how behaviour change interventions are delivered, including by whom, is key to understanding intervention effectiveness. However, information about who delivers interventions is reported inconsistently in intervention evaluations, limiting communication and knowledge accumulation. This paper reports a method for consistent reporting: The Intervention Source Ontology. This forms one part of the Behaviour Change Intervention Ontology, which aims to cover all aspects of behaviour change interventions : The Intervention Source Ontology was developed following methods for ontology development and maintenance used in the Human Behaviour-Change Project, with seven key steps: 1) define the scope of the ontology, 2) identify key entities and develop their preliminary definitions by reviewing existing classification systems (top-down) and reviewing 100 behaviour change intervention reports (bottom-up), 3) refine the ontology by piloting the preliminary ontology on 100 reports, 4) stakeholder review by 34 behavioural science and public health experts, 5) inter-rater reliability testing of annotating intervention reports using the ontology, 6) specify ontological relationships between entities and 7) disseminate and maintain the Intervention Source Ontology. The Intervention Source Ontology consists of 140 entities. Key areas of the ontology include , , and Inter-rater reliability was found to be 0.60 for those familiar with the ontology and 0.59 for those unfamiliar with it, levels of agreement considered 'acceptable'. Information about who delivers behaviour change interventions can be reliably specified using the Intervention Source Ontology. For human-delivered interventions, the ontology can be used to classify source characteristics in existing behaviour change reports and enable clearer specification of intervention sources in reporting.
确定行为改变干预措施的实施方式,包括由谁实施,是理解干预效果的关键。然而,关于谁实施干预措施的信息在干预评估中报告不一致,限制了交流和知识积累。本文报告了一种统一报告的方法:干预来源本体。这是行为改变干预本体的一部分,旨在涵盖行为改变干预的各个方面:干预来源本体是按照人类行为改变项目中使用的本体开发和维护方法开发的,有七个关键步骤:1)定义本体的范围;通过回顾现有分类系统(自上而下)和回顾100份行为改变干预报告(自下而上)来识别关键实体并制定其初步定义;3)通过在100份报告上试用初步本体来完善本体;4)由34位行为科学和公共卫生专家进行利益相关者审查;5)使用本体对干预报告进行注释的评分者间信度测试;6)指定实体之间的本体关系;7)传播和维护干预来源本体。干预来源本体由140个实体组成。本体的关键领域包括……熟悉本体的人评分者间信度为0.60,不熟悉本体的人评分者间信度为0.59,这些一致程度被认为是“可接受的”。使用干预来源本体可以可靠地确定谁实施行为改变干预措施。对于人为实施的干预措施,该本体可用于对现有行为改变报告中的来源特征进行分类,并在报告中更清晰地说明干预来源。