BDMS Wellness Clinic, Bangkok Dusit Medical Services PCL, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
Department of Clinical Dentistry, Walailak University International College of Dentistry, Walailak University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.
Molecules. 2021 Sep 1;26(17):5308. doi: 10.3390/molecules26175308.
Recently, translucent zirconia has become the most prevalent material used as a restorative material. This study aimed to compare the crown fracture load of the four most common different translucent zirconia brands available in the market at 1.5 mm thickness. Standardized tooth preparations for a full ceramic crown were designed digitally with software (AutoCAD) by placing a 1.0 mm chamfer margin and 1.5 mm occluso-cervical curvature for the crown sample manufacturing. Stylized crowns were chosen to control the thickness of the crown. The axial and occlusal thickness were standardized to 1.5 mm thickness except at the central pit, which was 1.3 mm thick. The STL file for the tooth dies was prepared using software (3Shape TRIOS Patient Monitoring, Copenhagen, Denmark). The tooth dies were printed with a resin material (NextDent Model 2.0, Vertex-Dental B.V., Soesterberg, The Netherlands) using a 3D printing software (3D Sprint Client Version 3.0.0.2494) from a 3D printer (NextDent™ 5100, Vertex-Dental B.V., Soesterberg, The Netherlands). The printing layer thickness was 50 µm. Then, a total of twenty-eight ( = 28) stylized crowns were milled out of AmannGirrbach (Amann Girrbach GmbH, Pforzheim, Germany) ( = 7), Cercon HT (Dentsply Sirona, Bensheim, Germany) ( = 7), Cercon XT (Dentsply Sirona, Bensheim, Germany) ( = 7), and Vita YZ XT (Zahnfabrik, Bäd Sackingen, Germany) ( = 7). Following sintering the crowns, sandblasting was performed and they were bonded to the tooth dies with the resin cement (RelyX U-200, 3M ESPE, Seefeld, Germany) and permitted to self-cure under finger pressure for 6 min. The crowns were loaded on the occlusal surface in a universal testing machine (MTS Centurion) with a stainless-steel ball indenter (7 mm radius) with a loading rate of 1 mm/min to contact the stylized crowns on each of the four cusps until failure. A rubber sheet (1.5 mm thickness) was positioned between the crown and indenter, which helped with the load distribution. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS version 20 (IBM Company, Chicago, USA). The fracture loads were analyzed using Dunnett's T3 test, and the number of cracks was analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test among the groups. The significant level was set at value = 0.05. The mean fracture loads were 3086.54 ± 441.74 N, 4804.94 ± 70.12 N, 3317.76 ± 199.80 N, and 2921.87 ± 349.67 N for AmannGirrbac, Cercon HT, Cercon XT, and Vita YZ XT, respectively. The mean fracture loads for the surfaces with the greatest number of cracks (excluding the occlusal surfaces) were on the lingual surface for AmannGirrbach and Cercon HT, on the distal and mesial for Cercon XT, and on the buccal for Vita YZ XT. We found that the AmannGirrbach had the most overall cracks. Cercon XT had the greatest number of occlusal cracks and appeared to be the most shattered. Cercon HT had the least number of cracks. In conclusion, Cercon HT presented the best strength properties, the highest fracture load, and no visible cracks. AmannGirrbach presented the lowest strength properties.
最近,半透明氧化锆已成为最常被用作修复材料的材料。本研究旨在比较市场上最常见的四种不同半透明氧化锆品牌的冠部断裂负荷,厚度均为 1.5 毫米。通过软件(AutoCAD)设计数字化标准牙冠预备,为冠样制造留出 1.0 毫米倒角边缘和 1.5 毫米牙合颈曲度。选择样式化冠以控制冠的厚度。轴厚和牙合面厚标准化为 1.5 毫米厚,但中央窝除外,厚度为 1.3 毫米。使用软件(3Shape TRIOS 患者监测,哥本哈根,丹麦)准备牙模的 STL 文件。使用 3D 打印软件(3D Sprint Client Version 3.0.0.2494)从 3D 打印机(NextDent™ 5100,Vertex-Dental B.V.,Soesterberg,荷兰)打印牙模,使用树脂材料(NextDent 模型 2.0,Vertex-Dental B.V.,Soesterberg,荷兰)。打印层厚度为 50 µm。然后,从阿曼吉尔巴赫(AmannGirrbach GmbH,普福尔茨海姆,德国)(=7)、Cercon HT(登士柏西诺德,本斯海姆,德国)(=7)、Cercon XT(登士柏西诺德,本斯海姆,德国)(=7)和 Vita YZ XT(泽纳,巴德萨克森,德国)(=7)共铣削出 28 个样式化冠。烧结后,对牙冠进行喷砂处理,并用树脂粘结剂(RelyX U-200,3M ESPE,Seefeld,德国)将其粘结到牙模上,并在手指压力下自固化 6 分钟。将牙冠放在万能试验机(MTS Centurion)上的牙合面,用不锈钢球压头(半径 7 毫米)以 1 毫米/分钟的加载速度接触每个牙尖的样式化牙冠,直到牙冠失效。在牙冠和压头之间放置一块 1.5 毫米厚的橡胶片,有助于载荷分布。使用 SPSS 版本 20(IBM 公司,芝加哥,美国)进行统计分析。使用 Dunnett 的 T3 检验分析断裂负荷,使用 Mann-Whitney U 检验分析各组之间的裂纹数量。显著水平设定为 值=0.05。AmannGirrbac、Cercon HT、Cercon XT 和 Vita YZ XT 的平均断裂负荷分别为 3086.54 ± 441.74 N、4804.94 ± 70.12 N、3317.76 ± 199.80 N 和 2921.87 ± 349.67 N。表面出现最大数量裂纹(不包括牙合面)的平均断裂负荷在 AmannGirrbac 和 Cercon HT 的舌面,在 Cercon XT 的远中和近中面,在 Vita YZ XT 的颊面。我们发现 AmannGirrbac 的总裂纹最多。Cercon XT 出现的牙合面裂纹最多,似乎碎裂得最严重。Cercon HT 的裂纹最少。总之,Cercon HT 表现出最好的强度特性,最大的断裂负荷,没有可见的裂纹。AmannGirrbach 表现出最低的强度特性。