Olie Renske H, Hensgens Rachelle R K, Wijnen Petal A H M, Veenstra Leo F, de Greef Bianca T A, Vries Minka J A, van der Meijden Paola E J, Ten Berg Jurriën M, Ten Cate Hugo, Bekers Otto, Henskens Yvonne M C
Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+ (MUMC+), 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Laboratory for Clinical Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.
J Clin Med. 2021 Sep 3;10(17):3992. doi: 10.3390/jcm10173992.
On-treatment platelet reactivity in clopidogrel-treated patients can be measured with several platelet function tests (PFTs). However, the agreement between different PFTs is only slight to moderate. Polymorphisms of the gene have an impact on the metabolization of clopidogrel and, thereby, have an impact on on-treatment platelet reactivity. The aim of the current study is to evaluate the differential effects of the genotype on three different PFTs.
From a prospective cohort study, we included patients treated with clopidogrel following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). One month after PCI, we simultaneously performed three different PFTs; light transmission aggregometry (LTA), VerifyNow P2Y12, and Multiplate. In whole EDTA blood, genotyping of the polymorphisms was performed.
We included 308 patients treated with clopidogrel in combination with aspirin (69.5%) and/or anticoagulants (33.8%) and, based on genotyping, classified them as either extensive (36.4%), rapid (34.7%), intermediate (26.0%), or poor metabolizers (2.9%). On-treatment platelet reactivity as measured by LTA and VerifyNow is significantly affected by metabolizer status ( < 0.01); as metabolizer status changes from rapid, via extensive and intermediate, to poor, the mean platelet reactivity increases accordingly ( < 0.01). On the contrary, for Multiplate, no such ordering of metabolizer groups was found ( = 0.10).
For VerifyNow and LTA, the on-treatment platelet reactivity in clopidogrel-treated patients correlates well with the underlying polymorphism. For Multiplate, no major effect of genetic background could be shown, and effects of other (patient-related) variables prevail. Thus, besides differences in test principles and the influence of patient-related factors, the disagreement between PFTs is partly explained by differential effects of the genotype.
接受氯吡格雷治疗的患者的治疗期间血小板反应性可通过多种血小板功能测试(PFT)进行测量。然而,不同PFT之间的一致性仅为轻度至中度。该基因的多态性会影响氯吡格雷的代谢,从而影响治疗期间的血小板反应性。本研究的目的是评估该基因型对三种不同PFT的不同影响。
在一项前瞻性队列研究中,我们纳入了经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后接受氯吡格雷治疗的患者。PCI术后1个月,我们同时进行了三种不同的PFT;光透射聚集法(LTA)、VerifyNow P2Y12和Multiplate。在全乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)血中进行该多态性的基因分型。
我们纳入了308例接受氯吡格雷联合阿司匹林(69.5%)和/或抗凝剂(33.8%)治疗的患者,并根据基因分型将他们分为快代谢型(36.4%)、超快代谢型(34.7%)、中代谢型(26.0%)或慢代谢型(2.9%)。通过LTA和VerifyNow测量的治疗期间血小板反应性受代谢型状态的显著影响(P<0.01);随着代谢型状态从超快、经快和中,变为慢,平均血小板反应性相应增加(P<0.01)。相反,对于Multiplate,未发现代谢型组的这种排序(P=0.10)。
对于VerifyNow和LTA,接受氯吡格雷治疗的患者的治疗期间血小板反应性与潜在的该多态性密切相关。对于Multiplate,未显示遗传背景的主要影响,其他(与患者相关的)变量的影响占主导。因此,除了测试原理的差异和患者相关因素的影响外,PFT之间的不一致部分可由该基因型的不同影响来解释。