School of Health and Environmental Science, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Korea.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 6;18(17):9395. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18179395.
In 2012, the Korean Occupational Safety and Health Agency developed Chemical Hazard Risk Management (CHARM) as a risk assessment tool. This study aims to reorganize the CHARM technique by complementing its logical loopholes, while evaluating the risk to enterprises and verifying this technique by applying it to some enterprises in Korea. The optimized technique changed the method of quantitative assessment and evaluation criteria, matched the risk level with the required control level, and specified the use of control practice. For the target enterprises, for several assessment methods, risk levels, hazard bands, exposure bands, and the risk assessment results were derived, and the same types of options were compared. Fewer informational methods resulted in more conservative results of risk levels and hazard bands. Since the control status of the enterprises could not be confirmed and the substances handled at the target enterprises were limited in this study, a follow-up study should be performed with more target materials and additional information on the current control status of the enterprises.
2012 年,韩国职业安全与健康署开发了化学危害风险管理(CHARM)作为风险评估工具。本研究旨在通过弥补其逻辑漏洞来重新组织 CHARM 技术,同时评估企业风险,并将该技术应用于韩国的一些企业进行验证。优化后的技术改变了定量评估方法和评价标准,使风险水平与所需的控制水平相匹配,并明确了控制实践的使用。对于目标企业,针对几种评估方法、风险水平、危害带、暴露带和风险评估结果进行了推导,并对相同类型的选项进行了比较。由于信息方法较少,风险水平和危害带的评估结果更为保守。由于无法确认目标企业的控制状况,且本研究中目标企业所处理的物质有限,因此应该对更多目标物质进行后续研究,并获取企业当前控制状况的附加信息。