Huh Yeon Jong, Kim Dong Hwan, Kim Bohyun, Choi Joon-Il, Rha Sung Eun
Department of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul 06591, Korea.
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Sep 2;13(17):4432. doi: 10.3390/cancers13174432.
We aimed to investigate the accuracy of each imaging feature of LI-RADS treatment response (LR-TR) viable category for diagnosing tumor viability of locoregional therapy (LRT)-treated HCC. Studies evaluating the per feature accuracy of the LR-TR viable category on dynamic contrast-enhanced CT or MRI were identified in databases. A bivariate random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of LR-TR viable features. Ten studies assessing the accuracies of LR-TR viable features (1153 treated observations in 971 patients) were included. The pooled sensitivities and specificities for diagnosing viable HCC were 81% (95% confidence interval [CI], 63-92%) and 95% (95% CI, 88-98%) for nodular, mass-like, or irregular thick tissue (NMLIT) with arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE), 55% (95% CI, 34-75%) and 96% (95% CI, 94-98%) for NMLIT with washout appearance, and 21% (95% CI, 6-53%) and 98% (95% CI, 92-100%) for NMLIT with enhancement similar to pretreatment, respectively. Of these features, APHE showed the highest pooled DOR (81 [95% CI, 25-261]), followed by washout appearance (32 [95% CI, 13-82]) and enhancement similar to pretreatment (14 [95% CI, 5-39]). In conclusion, APHE provided the highest sensitivity and DOR for diagnosing viable HCC following LRT, while enhancement similar to pretreatment showed suboptimal performance.
我们旨在研究肝脏影像报告和数据系统(LI-RADS)治疗反应(LR-TR)存活类别的各成像特征在诊断经局部区域治疗(LRT)的肝细胞癌(HCC)肿瘤存活情况时的准确性。在数据库中检索评估LR-TR存活类别在动态对比增强CT或MRI上各特征准确性的研究。采用双变量随机效应模型计算LR-TR存活特征的合并敏感度、特异度和诊断比值比(DOR)。纳入了10项评估LR-TR存活特征准确性的研究(971例患者中的1153个治疗观察结果)。对于动脉期强化(APHE)的结节状、肿块样或不规则增厚组织(NMLIT),诊断存活HCC的合并敏感度和特异度分别为81%(95%置信区间[CI],63 - 92%)和95%(95% CI,88 - 98%);对于呈廓清表现的NMLIT,合并敏感度和特异度分别为55%(95% CI,34 - 75%)和96%(95% CI,94 - 98%);对于强化类似于治疗前的NMLIT,合并敏感度和特异度分别为21%(95% CI,6 - 53%)和98%(95% CI,92 - 100%)。在这些特征中,APHE显示出最高的合并DOR(81 [95% CI,25 - 261]),其次是廓清表现(32 [95% CI,13 - 82])和强化类似于治疗前(14 [95% CI,5 - 39])。总之,APHE在诊断LRT后的存活HCC时提供了最高的敏感度和DOR,而强化类似于治疗前的表现显示出次优性能。