• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肝脏影像报告和数据系统局部区域治疗反应算法的特征水平准确性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析

Per-Feature Accuracy of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System Locoregional Treatment Response Algorithm: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Huh Yeon Jong, Kim Dong Hwan, Kim Bohyun, Choi Joon-Il, Rha Sung Eun

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul 06591, Korea.

出版信息

Cancers (Basel). 2021 Sep 2;13(17):4432. doi: 10.3390/cancers13174432.

DOI:10.3390/cancers13174432
PMID:34503241
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8430492/
Abstract

We aimed to investigate the accuracy of each imaging feature of LI-RADS treatment response (LR-TR) viable category for diagnosing tumor viability of locoregional therapy (LRT)-treated HCC. Studies evaluating the per feature accuracy of the LR-TR viable category on dynamic contrast-enhanced CT or MRI were identified in databases. A bivariate random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of LR-TR viable features. Ten studies assessing the accuracies of LR-TR viable features (1153 treated observations in 971 patients) were included. The pooled sensitivities and specificities for diagnosing viable HCC were 81% (95% confidence interval [CI], 63-92%) and 95% (95% CI, 88-98%) for nodular, mass-like, or irregular thick tissue (NMLIT) with arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE), 55% (95% CI, 34-75%) and 96% (95% CI, 94-98%) for NMLIT with washout appearance, and 21% (95% CI, 6-53%) and 98% (95% CI, 92-100%) for NMLIT with enhancement similar to pretreatment, respectively. Of these features, APHE showed the highest pooled DOR (81 [95% CI, 25-261]), followed by washout appearance (32 [95% CI, 13-82]) and enhancement similar to pretreatment (14 [95% CI, 5-39]). In conclusion, APHE provided the highest sensitivity and DOR for diagnosing viable HCC following LRT, while enhancement similar to pretreatment showed suboptimal performance.

摘要

我们旨在研究肝脏影像报告和数据系统(LI-RADS)治疗反应(LR-TR)存活类别的各成像特征在诊断经局部区域治疗(LRT)的肝细胞癌(HCC)肿瘤存活情况时的准确性。在数据库中检索评估LR-TR存活类别在动态对比增强CT或MRI上各特征准确性的研究。采用双变量随机效应模型计算LR-TR存活特征的合并敏感度、特异度和诊断比值比(DOR)。纳入了10项评估LR-TR存活特征准确性的研究(971例患者中的1153个治疗观察结果)。对于动脉期强化(APHE)的结节状、肿块样或不规则增厚组织(NMLIT),诊断存活HCC的合并敏感度和特异度分别为81%(95%置信区间[CI],63 - 92%)和95%(95% CI,88 - 98%);对于呈廓清表现的NMLIT,合并敏感度和特异度分别为55%(95% CI,34 - 75%)和96%(95% CI,94 - 98%);对于强化类似于治疗前的NMLIT,合并敏感度和特异度分别为21%(95% CI,6 - 53%)和98%(95% CI,92 - 100%)。在这些特征中,APHE显示出最高的合并DOR(81 [95% CI,25 - 261]),其次是廓清表现(32 [95% CI,13 - 82])和强化类似于治疗前(14 [95% CI,5 - 39])。总之,APHE在诊断LRT后的存活HCC时提供了最高的敏感度和DOR,而强化类似于治疗前的表现显示出次优性能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d556/8430492/a07d78d9043b/cancers-13-04432-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d556/8430492/8fcd6eaadfbe/cancers-13-04432-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d556/8430492/382c6987b15d/cancers-13-04432-g002a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d556/8430492/a07d78d9043b/cancers-13-04432-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d556/8430492/8fcd6eaadfbe/cancers-13-04432-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d556/8430492/382c6987b15d/cancers-13-04432-g002a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d556/8430492/a07d78d9043b/cancers-13-04432-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Per-Feature Accuracy of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System Locoregional Treatment Response Algorithm: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.肝脏影像报告和数据系统局部区域治疗反应算法的特征水平准确性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Sep 2;13(17):4432. doi: 10.3390/cancers13174432.
2
Diagnostic performance of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System treatment response algorithm: a systematic review and meta-analysis.肝脏影像报告和数据系统治疗反应算法的诊断性能:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Radiol. 2021 Jul;31(7):4785-4793. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07464-7. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
3
LI-RADS treatment response algorithm for detecting incomplete necrosis in hepatocellular carcinoma after locoregional treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis using individual patient data.LI-RADS 治疗反应算法用于检测局部治疗后肝细胞癌不完全坏死:使用个体患者数据的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021 Aug;46(8):3717-3728. doi: 10.1007/s00261-021-03122-8. Epub 2021 May 23.
4
LI-RADS Major Features on MRI for Diagnosing Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.LI-RADS 磁共振成像诊断肝细胞癌的主要特征:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2021 Aug;54(2):518-525. doi: 10.1002/jmri.27570. Epub 2021 Feb 27.
5
LI-RADS Treatment Response versus Modified RECIST for Diagnosing Viable Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Locoregional Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies.肝脏影像报告和数据系统(LI-RADS)治疗反应与改良实体瘤疗效评价标准(mRECIST)在诊断局部区域治疗后存活肝细胞癌中的比较:一项比较研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe Chi. 2022 Mar;83(2):331-343. doi: 10.3348/jksr.2021.0173. Epub 2022 Feb 25.
6
Usefulness of Arterial Subtraction in Applying Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) Treatment Response Algorithm to Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI.动脉减影在应用钆塞酸增强 MRI 的肝脏成像报告和数据系统(LI-RADS)治疗反应算法中的作用。
Korean J Radiol. 2021 Aug;22(8):1289-1299. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2020.1394. Epub 2021 May 20.
7
Diagnostic Performance of LI-RADS Treatment Response Algorithm for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Adding Ancillary Features to MRI Compared with Enhancement Patterns at CT and MRI.LI-RADS 治疗反应算法对肝细胞癌的诊断性能:与 CT 和 MRI 的增强模式相比,添加 MRI 的辅助特征。
Radiology. 2020 Sep;296(3):554-561. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020192797. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
8
LI-RADS treatment response categorization on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI: diagnostic performance compared to mRECIST and added value of ancillary features.钆塞酸增强 MRI 的 LI-RADS 治疗反应分类:与 mRECIST 的诊断性能比较及辅助特征的附加价值。
Eur Radiol. 2020 May;30(5):2861-2870. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06623-9. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
9
Diagnostic accuracy of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System locoregional treatment response criteria: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System 局部区域治疗反应标准的诊断准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Radiol. 2021 Oct;31(10):7725-7733. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-07837-6. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
10
Diagnostic Performance of CT/MRI Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System v2017 for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.CT/MRI肝脏影像报告和数据系统v2017对肝细胞癌的诊断性能:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Liver Int. 2020 Jun;40(6):1488-1497. doi: 10.1111/liv.14424. Epub 2020 Mar 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI in hepatocellular carcinoma: a comprehensive review of diagnostic, surveillance, and treatment response prediction and assessment.钆塞酸二钠增强磁共振成像在肝细胞癌中的应用:诊断、监测及治疗反应预测与评估的全面综述
Jpn J Radiol. 2025 Sep 15. doi: 10.1007/s11604-025-01870-x.
2
Application of LI-RADS CT/MRI Radiation Treatment Response Assessment Version 2024: a study after transarterial radioembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma.《肝脏影像报告和数据系统(LI-RADS)CT/MRI放射治疗反应评估版本2024的应用:一项肝细胞癌经动脉放射性栓塞术后的研究》
Jpn J Radiol. 2025 Apr 16. doi: 10.1007/s11604-025-01785-7.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Usefulness of Arterial Subtraction in Applying Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) Treatment Response Algorithm to Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI.动脉减影在应用钆塞酸增强 MRI 的肝脏成像报告和数据系统(LI-RADS)治疗反应算法中的作用。
Korean J Radiol. 2021 Aug;22(8):1289-1299. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2020.1394. Epub 2021 May 20.
2
LI-RADS Version 2018 Treatment Response Algorithm: Diagnostic Performance after Transarterial Radioembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.LI-RADS 版本 2018 治疗反应算法:经肝动脉放射栓塞治疗肝细胞癌后的诊断性能。
Korean J Radiol. 2021 Aug;22(8):1279-1288. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2020.1159. Epub 2021 May 4.
3
Assessment of viable tumours by [Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT after local regional treatment in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.
肝细胞癌患者局部区域治疗后用[镓]镓-FAPI-04 PET/CT评估存活肿瘤
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2025 May;52(6):2132-2144. doi: 10.1007/s00259-024-07062-5. Epub 2025 Jan 20.
4
CT/MRI LI-RADS 2024 Update: Treatment Response Assessment.CT/MRI LI-RADS 2024 更新:治疗反应评估。
Radiology. 2024 Nov;313(2):e232408. doi: 10.1148/radiol.232408.
5
LI-RADS version 2018 treatment response algorithm on extracellular contrast-enhanced MRI in patients treated with transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: diagnostic performance and the added value of ancillary features.LI-RADS 版本 2018 经动脉化疗栓塞治疗肝细胞癌患者的细胞外对比增强 MRI 治疗反应算法:诊断性能和辅助特征的附加价值。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024 Sep;49(9):3045-3055. doi: 10.1007/s00261-024-04275-y. Epub 2024 Apr 11.
6
Liver Cancer: Improving Standard Diagnosis and Therapy.肝癌:改善标准诊断与治疗
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Sep 17;15(18):4602. doi: 10.3390/cancers15184602.
7
Updates on LI-RADS Treatment Response Criteria for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Focusing on MRI.LI-RADS 治疗反应标准更新:聚焦于肝癌的 MRI 表现。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2023 Jun;57(6):1641-1654. doi: 10.1002/jmri.28659. Epub 2023 Mar 5.
8
Evaluation and Prediction of Treatment Response for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.肝细胞癌的治疗反应评估与预测。
Magn Reson Med Sci. 2023 Apr 1;22(2):209-220. doi: 10.2463/mrms.rev.2022-0118. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
9
Clinical Significance of Liver MR Imaging.肝脏磁共振成像的临床意义。
Magn Reson Med Sci. 2023 Apr 1;22(2):157-175. doi: 10.2463/mrms.rev.2022-0100. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
10
LI-RADS Treatment Response versus Modified RECIST for Diagnosing Viable Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Locoregional Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies.肝脏影像报告和数据系统(LI-RADS)治疗反应与改良实体瘤疗效评价标准(mRECIST)在诊断局部区域治疗后存活肝细胞癌中的比较:一项比较研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe Chi. 2022 Mar;83(2):331-343. doi: 10.3348/jksr.2021.0173. Epub 2022 Feb 25.
Surgical Resection vs. Percutaneous Ablation for Single Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Exploring the Impact of Li-RADS Classification on Oncological Outcomes.
单发性肝细胞癌的手术切除与经皮消融治疗:探讨肝脏影像报告和数据系统(Li-RADS)分类对肿瘤学结局的影响
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Apr 1;13(7):1671. doi: 10.3390/cancers13071671.
4
Abbreviated MRI Protocol for the Assessment of Ablated Area in HCC Patients.用于评估肝癌患者消融区域的简化磁共振成像方案
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 30;18(7):3598. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073598.
5
Evaluation of LI-RADS Version 2018 Treatment Response Algorithm for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Liver Transplant Candidates: Intraindividual Comparison between CT and Hepatobiliary Agent-enhanced MRI.LI-RADS 版本 2018 肝细胞癌治疗反应算法在肝移植候选者中的评估:CT 和肝胆期增强 MRI 的个体内比较。
Radiology. 2021 May;299(2):336-345. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021203537. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
6
Diagnostic performance of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System treatment response algorithm: a systematic review and meta-analysis.肝脏影像报告和数据系统治疗反应算法的诊断性能:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Radiol. 2021 Jul;31(7):4785-4793. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07464-7. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
7
Added Value of CT Arterial Subtraction Images in Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System Treatment Response Categorization for Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization-Treated Hepatocellular Carcinoma.CT 动脉减影图像在经导管动脉化疗栓塞治疗肝细胞癌的肝脏影像报告和数据系统治疗反应分类中的附加价值。
Invest Radiol. 2021 Feb 1;56(2):109-116. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000714.
8
Diagnostic Performance of LI-RADS Treatment Response Algorithm for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Adding Ancillary Features to MRI Compared with Enhancement Patterns at CT and MRI.LI-RADS 治疗反应算法对肝细胞癌的诊断性能:与 CT 和 MRI 的增强模式相比,添加 MRI 的辅助特征。
Radiology. 2020 Sep;296(3):554-561. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020192797. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
9
LI-RADS treatment response categorization on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI: diagnostic performance compared to mRECIST and added value of ancillary features.钆塞酸增强 MRI 的 LI-RADS 治疗反应分类:与 mRECIST 的诊断性能比较及辅助特征的附加价值。
Eur Radiol. 2020 May;30(5):2861-2870. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06623-9. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
10
The LI-RADS Version 2018 MRI Treatment Response Algorithm: Evaluation of Ablated Hepatocellular Carcinoma.LI-RADS 版本 2018 MRI 治疗反应算法:消融治疗肝细胞癌的评估。
Radiology. 2020 Feb;294(2):320-326. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019191581. Epub 2019 Dec 17.