• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后支架内再狭窄的相关危险因素。

Risk factors associated with intra-stent restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention.

作者信息

Alexandrescu Dan-Mihai, Mitu Ovidiu, Costache Irina Iuliana, Macovei Liviu, Mitu Ivona, Alexandrescu Anca, Georgescu Catalina Arsenescu

机构信息

1 Medical Department, 'Grigore T. Popa' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania.

Department of Cardiology-Internal Medicine, Emergency County Hospital, 610136 Piatra Neamt, Romania.

出版信息

Exp Ther Med. 2021 Oct;22(4):1141. doi: 10.3892/etm.2021.10575. Epub 2021 Aug 9.

DOI:10.3892/etm.2021.10575
PMID:34504587
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8394103/
Abstract

The present study aimed to explore the correlations between clinical, biological, imagistic and procedural factors with the risk of intra-stent restenosis (ISR) in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). An observational cross-sectional study was conducted in a high-volume PCI center over a period of 2 years. A total of 235 consecutive patients diagnosed with angina or acute coronary syndrome treated by PCI were included in the study. Diagnosis of ISR was documented by coronary angiography in patients with suggestive coronary symptoms and ischemic changes in non-invasive or invasive paraclinical investigations. Thus, they were assigned to two groups: With or without ISR. All patients underwent clinical and laboratory examination, providing clinical and paraclinical variables that could be considered risk factors for ISR. Current smokers [risk ratio (RR)=1.63; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.25-2.13], arterial hypertension (RR=1.86; 95% CI: 1.41-2.45), diabetes (RR=1.83; 95% CI: 1.42-2.36), high C-reactive protein (CRP) levels (RR=1.44; 95% CI: 0.93-2.24), chronic kidney disease (CKD) (RR=1.90; 95% CI: 1.53-2.36) and thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) score were found to have a significant role in estimating the risk for ISR. Moreover, the ISR group (119 patients) presented with a lower stent inflation pressure when compared to the control group (116 patients) (14.47 vs. 16.14 mmHg, P=0.004). An increased mean stent diameter used for PCI was not associated with a high ISR incidence (P=0.810) as well as complex coronary treated lesions with longer stents (mean length of 24.98 mm in patients without ISR vs. 25.22 mm in patients with ISR; P=0.311). There was an estimated two times higher risk (RR=2.13; 95% CI: 1.17-3.88) concerning multi-stenting and restenosis degree >70%. To conclude, smoking, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, high CRP levels, CKD, TIMI score, stent type, low pressure for stent implantation and multi-stenting were found to be associated with ISR in patients following PCI. Therefore, a close follow-up should be targeted in such patients.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨冠心病(CAD)患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后,临床、生物学、影像学和手术因素与支架内再狭窄(ISR)风险之间的相关性。在一家大型PCI中心进行了为期2年的观察性横断面研究。共有235例连续诊断为心绞痛或急性冠状动脉综合征并接受PCI治疗的患者纳入研究。对有提示性冠状动脉症状且无创或有创辅助检查出现缺血性改变的患者,通过冠状动脉造影记录ISR的诊断。因此,他们被分为两组:有或无ISR。所有患者均接受了临床和实验室检查,提供了可被视为ISR危险因素的临床和辅助临床变量。当前吸烟者[风险比(RR)=1.63;95%置信区间(95%CI):1.25 - 2.13]、动脉高血压(RR=1.86;95%CI:1.41 - 2.45)、糖尿病(RR=1.83;95%CI:1.42 - 2.36)、高C反应蛋白(CRP)水平(RR=1.44;95%CI:0.93 - 2.24)、慢性肾脏病(CKD)(RR=1.90;95%CI:1.53 - 2.36)和心肌梗死溶栓(TIMI)评分在评估ISR风险中具有重要作用。此外,与对照组(116例患者)相比,ISR组(119例患者)的支架膨胀压力较低(14.47 vs. 16.14 mmHg,P=0.004)。用于PCI的平均支架直径增加与高ISR发生率无关(P=0.810),以及使用较长支架治疗的复杂冠状动脉病变也无关(无ISR患者的平均长度为24.98 mm,有ISR患者为25.22 mm;P=0.311)。多支架置入和再狭窄程度>70%的风险估计高出两倍(RR=2.13;95%CI:1.17 - 3.88)。总之,吸烟、高血压、糖尿病、高CRP水平、CKD、TIMI评分、支架类型、低支架植入压力和多支架置入与PCI术后患者的ISR相关。因此,应对此类患者进行密切随访。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/177a/8394103/0bc2a9c9889c/etm-22-04-10575-g04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/177a/8394103/af61c4225c80/etm-22-04-10575-g00.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/177a/8394103/f749e34a26b1/etm-22-04-10575-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/177a/8394103/308522d3b9d7/etm-22-04-10575-g02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/177a/8394103/59e246542159/etm-22-04-10575-g03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/177a/8394103/0bc2a9c9889c/etm-22-04-10575-g04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/177a/8394103/af61c4225c80/etm-22-04-10575-g00.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/177a/8394103/f749e34a26b1/etm-22-04-10575-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/177a/8394103/308522d3b9d7/etm-22-04-10575-g02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/177a/8394103/59e246542159/etm-22-04-10575-g03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/177a/8394103/0bc2a9c9889c/etm-22-04-10575-g04.jpg

相似文献

1
Risk factors associated with intra-stent restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后支架内再狭窄的相关危险因素。
Exp Ther Med. 2021 Oct;22(4):1141. doi: 10.3892/etm.2021.10575. Epub 2021 Aug 9.
2
The characteristics and risk factors of in-stent restenosis in patients with percutaneous coronary intervention: what can we do.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者支架内再狭窄的特征和危险因素:我们能做些什么。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020 Dec 4;20(1):510. doi: 10.1186/s12872-020-01798-2.
3
Levels of plasma Quaking and cyclooxygenase-2 predict in-stent restenosis in patients with coronary artery disease after percutaneous coronary intervention.血浆 Quaking 和环氧化酶-2 水平可预测经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后冠心病患者的支架内再狭窄。
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2022 Jun 28;47(6):739-747. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2022.210716.
4
A comparison of clinical presentations, angiographic patterns and outcomes of in-stent restenosis between bare metal stents and drug eluting stents.比较裸金属支架和药物洗脱支架的支架内再狭窄的临床表现、血管造影模式和结局。
EuroIntervention. 2010 Feb;5(7):841-6. doi: 10.4244/eijv5i7a141.
5
New predictors of in-stent restenosis in patients with diabetes mellitus undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent.接受药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的糖尿病患者支架内再狭窄的新预测指标。
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2018 Feb;15(2):137-145. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2018.02.011.
6
Non-Fasting Hypertriglyceridemia as an Independent Risk Factor for Coronary In-Stent Restenosis after Primary Bare Metal Stent Implantation in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease.非空腹性高甘油三酯血症是冠心病患者初次行单纯金属支架植入术后冠状动脉支架内再狭窄的独立危险因素。
Int Heart J. 2021;62(5):970-979. doi: 10.1536/ihj.21-015.
7
Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty Versus Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation in Patients With Coronary Stent Restenosis.药物涂层球囊血管成形术与药物洗脱支架置入术治疗冠状动脉支架再狭窄患者的比较。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Jun 2;75(21):2664-2678. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.04.006.
8
Acute coronary syndrome - a frequent clinical manifestation of bare metal in-stent restenosis.急性冠状动脉综合征 - 金属裸支架再狭窄的常见临床表现。
Kardiol Pol. 2010 Jun;68(6):637-45.
9
Usefulness of the CHA2DS2-VASc Score in Predicting In-Stent Restenosis Among Patients Undergoing Revascularization With Bare-Metal Stents.CHA2DS2-VASc评分在预测接受裸金属支架血管重建术患者支架内再狭窄中的应用价值。
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2018 May;24(4):589-595. doi: 10.1177/1076029617716769. Epub 2017 Jul 4.
10
Role of red blood cell distribution in predicting drug-eluting stent restenosis in patients with stable angina pectoris after coronary stenting.红细胞分布宽度在预测稳定性心绞痛患者冠状动脉支架置入术后药物洗脱支架再狭窄中的作用
Coron Artery Dis. 2015 May;26(3):220-4. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000221.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of Whole Blood Viscosity to Predict Stent Restenosis in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease.评估全血粘度以预测冠心病患者的支架再狭窄
Anatol J Cardiol. 2025 May 29;29(9):503-11. doi: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2025.5407.
2
Intracoronary Brachytherapy for Drug-Eluting Stent Restenosis: Outcomes and Clinical Correlates.药物洗脱支架再狭窄的冠状动脉内近距离放射治疗:结果与临床关联
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2023 Jan 2;2(1):100550. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2022.100550. eCollection 2023 Jan-Feb.
3
Drug-Eluting Balloons and Drug-Eluting Stents in Diabetic Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Due to Restenosis-DM-Dragon Registry.

本文引用的文献

1
Inflammation as a determinant of healing response after coronary stent implantation.炎症作为冠状动脉支架植入术后愈合反应的一个决定因素。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Mar;37(3):791-801. doi: 10.1007/s10554-020-02073-3. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
2
Serum uric acid, predicts heart failure in a large Italian cohort: search for a cut-off value the URic acid Right for heArt Health study.血清尿酸可预测意大利大队列人群的心力衰竭:寻找尿酸右心健康研究的截断值。
J Hypertens. 2021 Jan;39(1):62-69. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002589.
3
Homozygous receptors for insulin and not IGF-1 accelerate intimal hyperplasia in insulin resistance and diabetes.
糖尿病患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后再狭窄的药物洗脱球囊和药物洗脱支架——糖尿病-龙注册研究
J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 30;13(15):4464. doi: 10.3390/jcm13154464.
4
A systematic review and bioinformatic study on clinical, paraclinical, and genetic factors predisposing to stent restenosis following percutaneous coronary intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后支架再狭窄的临床、辅助检查和遗传因素的系统评价和生物信息学研究。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024 Jun 14;24(1):304. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-03955-3.
5
Intrastent Restenosis: A Comprehensive Review.支架内再狭窄:全面综述。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Jan 30;25(3):1715. doi: 10.3390/ijms25031715.
6
In-stent restenosis in acute coronary syndrome-a classic and a machine learning approach.急性冠状动脉综合征中的支架内再狭窄——经典方法与机器学习方法
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Dec 22;10:1270986. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1270986. eCollection 2023.
7
Targeted Nanoparticles for the Binding of Injured Vascular Endothelium after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后损伤的血管内皮细胞靶向纳米粒子。
Molecules. 2022 Nov 23;27(23):8144. doi: 10.3390/molecules27238144.
胰岛素和 IGF-1 的同源受体在胰岛素抵抗和糖尿病中加速内膜增生。
Nat Commun. 2019 Sep 27;10(1):4427. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12368-2.
4
Meta-analysis of drug eluting stents compared with bare metal stents in high bleeding risk patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions.药物洗脱支架与金属裸支架在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗高出血风险患者中的荟萃分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Jul 1;94(1):98-104. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28045. Epub 2018 Dec 26.
5
First-generation versus second-generation drug-eluting stents in patients with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.第一代与第二代药物洗脱支架在慢性肾脏病患者中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Postgrad Med. 2019 Jan;131(1):43-51. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2019.1546531. Epub 2018 Dec 3.
6
Comprehensive analysis of predictive factors for rapid angiographic stenotic progression and restenosis risk in coronary artery disease patients underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents implantation.对接受药物洗脱支架植入的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的冠心病患者快速血管造影狭窄进展和再狭窄风险的预测因素进行综合分析。
J Clin Lab Anal. 2019 Feb;33(2):e22666. doi: 10.1002/jcla.22666. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
7
Impact of hyperuricemia on clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention for in-stent restenosis.高尿酸血症对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗支架内再狭窄后临床结局的影响。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2018 Jun 11;18(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s12872-018-0840-2.
8
Current Management of In-Stent Restenosis.支架内再狭窄的当前管理
Korean Circ J. 2018 May;48(5):337-349. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2018.0103.
9
Treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis: a systematic review.冠状动脉支架内再狭窄的治疗:一项系统评价
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2018 Feb;15(2):173-184. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2018.02.007.
10
Percutaneous coronary intervention: 2017 in review.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:2017年回顾
J Interv Cardiol. 2018 Apr;31(2):117-128. doi: 10.1111/joic.12508. Epub 2018 Mar 25.