Department of Statistics, Computer Science, Applications (DISIA), University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 10;16(9):e0257099. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257099. eCollection 2021.
Screening plans for prevention and containment of SARS-CoV-2 infection should take into account the epidemic context, the fact that undetected infected individuals may transmit the disease and that the infection spreads through outbreaks, creating clusters in the population. In this paper, we compare through simulations the performance of six screening plans based on poorly sensitive individual tests, in detecting infection outbreaks at the level of single classes in a typical European school context. The performance evaluation is done by simulating different epidemic dynamics within the class during the four weeks following the day of the initial infection. The plans have different costs in terms of number of individual tests required for the screening and are based on recurrent evaluations on all students or subgroups of students in rotation. Especially in scenarios where the rate of contagion is high, at an equal cost, testing half of the class in rotation every week appears to be better in terms of sensitivity than testing all students every two weeks. Similarly, testing one-fourth of the students every week is comparable with testing all students every two weeks, despite the first one is a much cheaper strategy. In conclusion, we show that in the presence of natural clusters in the population, testing subgroups of individuals belonging to the same cluster in rotation may have a better performance than testing all the individuals less frequently. The proposed simulations approach can be extended to evaluate more complex screening plans than those presented in the paper.
预防和控制 SARS-CoV-2 感染的筛查计划应考虑到疫情背景、未被发现的感染者可能传播疾病以及感染通过暴发传播、在人群中形成聚集的事实。在本文中,我们通过模拟比较了六种基于个体检测敏感性较差的筛查计划在典型欧洲学校环境中单班感染暴发的检测性能。通过模拟初始感染后四周内班级内不同的疫情动态,对性能进行评估。这些计划在筛查所需的个体检测数量方面具有不同的成本,并且基于对所有学生或轮换的学生分组进行定期评估。特别是在传染率较高的情况下,以相同的成本,每周轮换一半班级进行检测在敏感性方面要好于每两周检测所有学生。同样,每周检测四分之一的学生与每两周检测所有学生相当,尽管前者是一种成本低得多的策略。总之,我们表明,在人群中存在自然聚集的情况下,轮流检测属于同一聚集的个体分组可能比不那么频繁地检测所有个体具有更好的性能。所提出的模拟方法可以扩展到评估比本文中提出的更复杂的筛查计划。