Suppr超能文献

B 型超声与 MRI 测量儿童视神经鞘直径的比较。

Comparison of B-Scan Ultrasound and MRI-Based Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter (ONSD) Measurements in Children.

机构信息

Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Tübingen, Germany.

Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Tübingen, Germany.

出版信息

Pediatr Neurol. 2021 Nov;124:15-20. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2021.08.002. Epub 2021 Aug 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Qualitative, noninvasive assessment of intracranial pressure is of eminent importance in pediatric patients in many clinical situations and can reliably be performed using transorbital ultrasonographic measurement of the optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD). MRI-based determination of ONSD can serve as an alternative if ultrasound (US) is not possible or available for various reasons, for example, in small, incompliant children. This study investigates repeatability and observer reliability of US ONSD and correlation and bias of US- versus MRI-based ONSD assessment in pediatric patients.

METHODS

One hundred fifty children diagnosed with tumor (n = 40), hydrocephalus (n = 42), and other cranial pathologies (n = 68) were included. Bilateral ONSD was quantified by US using a 12-MHz linear array transducer. This was compared with ONSD measured in simultaneously acquired (≤24 h) T2-weighted MRI scans of the orbit.

RESULTS

Repeatability of individual US values and intraobserver ONSD was outstanding (Cronbach's α = 0.984 and 0.996, respectively). Overall mean values for ONSD were 5.8 ± 0.88 mm and 5.7 ± 0.89 mm for US and MRI, respectively. Correlation between US and MRI-based ONSD was strong (r = 0.976, P < 0.01). Bland and Altman analysis showed a mean bias of 0.078 mm. A repeated-measures correlation (r) in 9 patients showed an excellent value (r = 0.94, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Repeatability and reliability of US ONSD determination is excellent. In case US ONSD assessment is not possible or available, MRI scans can serve as an excellent alternative. The difference of US and MRI ONSD is minimal and insignificant, and thus, both techniques can complement each other.

摘要

背景

在许多临床情况下,对颅内压进行定性、非侵入性评估对儿科患者至关重要,而使用经眶超声测量视神经鞘直径(ONSD)可以可靠地进行。如果由于各种原因(例如,对于小而不配合的儿童)无法进行或无法使用超声(US),则可以使用基于 MRI 的 ONSD 测定作为替代方法。本研究旨在调查 US ONSD 的可重复性和观察者可靠性,以及在儿科患者中 US 与基于 MRI 的 ONSD 评估的相关性和偏差。

方法

本研究纳入了 150 名被诊断为肿瘤(n=40)、脑积水(n=42)和其他颅神经病理学疾病(n=68)的儿童患者。使用 12MHz 线性阵列换能器通过 US 对双侧 ONSD 进行定量测量。将其与同时采集的(≤24 小时)眼眶 T2 加权 MRI 扫描的 ONSD 进行比较。

结果

个体 US 值和观察者内 ONSD 的重复性非常出色(Cronbach's α分别为 0.984 和 0.996)。ONSD 的总体平均值分别为 5.8±0.88mm 和 5.7±0.89mm,用于 US 和 MRI。US 和基于 MRI 的 ONSD 之间的相关性很强(r=0.976,P<0.01)。Bland 和 Altman 分析显示平均偏差为 0.078mm。9 名患者的重复测量相关性(r)显示出极好的值(r=0.94,P<0.01)。

结论

US ONSD 测定的重复性和可靠性非常出色。如果无法进行或无法使用 US ONSD 评估,则 MRI 扫描可以作为出色的替代方法。US 和 MRI ONSD 的差异很小且无统计学意义,因此两种技术可以互补。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验