Suppr超能文献

跨壁创伤护理模式可以很好地实施,但在实施过程中应考虑一些障碍和促进因素:一项混合方法研究。

The Transmural Trauma Care Model can be implemented well but some barriers and facilitators should be considered during implementation: a mixed methods study.

机构信息

Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

出版信息

J Physiother. 2021 Oct;67(4):298-307. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2021.08.017. Epub 2021 Sep 10.

Abstract

QUESTIONS

What is the reach, dose delivered, dose received and fidelity of the Transmural Trauma Care Model (TTCM)? What are the barriers and facilitators associated with the implementation of the TTCM?

DESIGN

Mixed-methods process evaluation with quantitative evaluation of the extent to which the TTCM was implemented as intended and qualitative evaluation of barriers and facilitators to its implementation.

PARTICIPANTS

Focus group participants included trauma patients, trauma surgeons, hospital-based physiotherapists and primary care network physiotherapists.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Implementation was assessed with reach, dose delivered, dose received and fidelity.

DATA ANALYSIS

A framework method was used to analyse the focus groups and the 'constellation approach' was used to categorise barriers and facilitators into three categories: structure, culture and practice.

RESULTS

The TTCM's reach was 81%, its dose delivered was 99% and 100%, and its dose received was 95% and 96% for the multidisciplinary TTCM consultation hours at the outpatient clinic for trauma patients and the primary care network physiotherapists, respectively. Various fidelity scores ranged from 66 to 93%. Numerous barriers and facilitators associated with the implementation of the TTCM were identified and categorised.

CONCLUSION

This process evaluation showed that the TTCM was largely implemented as intended. Furthermore, various facilitators and barriers were identified that need to be considered when implementing the TTCM more widely. Differences were found among stakeholders but they were generally of the opinion that if the barriers were overcome, the quality of care and patient satisfaction were likely to improve significantly after implementing the TTCM.

REGISTRATION

NTR5474.

摘要

问题

经腔创伤护理模式(TTCM)的覆盖范围、给予剂量、接收剂量和保真度如何?实施 TTCM 相关的障碍和促进因素有哪些?

设计

混合方法过程评估,定量评估 TTCM 按预期实施的程度,定性评估实施的障碍和促进因素。

参与者

焦点小组参与者包括创伤患者、创伤外科医生、基于医院的物理治疗师和初级保健网络物理治疗师。

结果测量

实施情况通过覆盖范围、给予剂量、接收剂量和保真度进行评估。

数据分析

采用框架方法分析焦点小组,采用“组合方法”将障碍和促进因素分为结构、文化和实践三个类别。

结果

TTCM 的覆盖范围为 81%,其在创伤患者门诊多学科 TTCM 咨询时间和初级保健网络物理治疗师中的给予剂量分别为 99%和 100%,接受剂量分别为 95%和 96%。各种保真度评分范围为 66 至 93%。确定并分类了与 TTCM 实施相关的许多障碍和促进因素。

结论

该过程评估表明,TTCM 基本按预期实施。此外,确定了各种促进因素和障碍,在更广泛地实施 TTCM 时需要考虑这些因素。利益相关者之间存在差异,但他们普遍认为,如果克服了障碍,实施 TTCM 后,护理质量和患者满意度可能会显著提高。

登记

NTR5474。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验