Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
J Alzheimers Dis. 2021;84(1):193-205. doi: 10.3233/JAD-210582.
In Alzheimer's disease and related disorders (ADRD) research, common outcome measures include cognitive and functional impairment, as well as persons with mild cognitive impairment (pwMCI) and care partner self-reported mood and quality of life. Studies commonly analyze these measures separately, which potentially leads to issues of multiple comparisons and/or multicollinearity among measures while ignoring the latent constructs they may be measuring.
This study sought to examine the latent factor structure of a battery of 12-13 measures of domains mentioned above, used in a multicomponent behavioral intervention (The HABIT® program) for pwMCI and their partners.
Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) involved 214 pwMCI-partner pairs. Subsequent Confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) used 730 pairs in both pre- and post-intervention conditions.
EFA generated a three-factor model. Factors could be characterized as partner adjustment (29.9%), pwMCI adjustment (18.1%), and pwMCI impairment (12.8%). The subsequent CFA confirmed our findings, and the goodness-of-fit for this model was adequate in both the pre- (CFI = 0.937; RMSEA = 0.057, p = 0.089) and post-intervention (CFI = 0.942; RMSEA = 0.051, p = 0.430) groups.
Results demonstrated a stable factor structure across cohorts and intervention conditions suggesting that three broad factors may provide a straightforward and meaningful model to assess intervention outcome, at least during the MCI phase of ADRD.
在阿尔茨海默病和相关疾病(ADRD)研究中,常见的结果测量包括认知和功能障碍,以及轻度认知障碍(pwMCI)患者和照顾者自我报告的情绪和生活质量。研究通常分别分析这些测量结果,这可能导致在忽略它们可能正在测量的潜在结构的情况下,在测量结果之间存在多重比较和/或多重共线性的问题。
本研究旨在检验用于 pwMCI 及其伴侣的多成分行为干预(HABIT® 计划)的 12-13 个上述领域测量指标组合的潜在因子结构。
探索性因子分析(EFA)涉及 214 对 pwMCI-伴侣。随后的验证性因子分析(CFA)分别在干预前和干预后使用 730 对数据。
EFA 生成了一个三因素模型。这些因素可以被描述为伴侣调整(29.9%)、pwMCI 调整(18.1%)和 pwMCI 损伤(12.8%)。随后的 CFA 验证了我们的发现,并且该模型在干预前(CFI=0.937;RMSEA=0.057,p=0.089)和干预后(CFI=0.942;RMSEA=0.051,p=0.430)两组中的拟合度均良好。
结果表明,在队列和干预条件之间存在稳定的因子结构,这表明三个广泛的因素可能提供了一个简单而有意义的模型来评估干预结果,至少在 ADRD 的 MCI 阶段是如此。