Ying Gelan, Perez-Lao Ambar, Marsiske Michael, Levy Shellie-Anne, Smith Glenn E
Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Front Aging Neurosci. 2024 Apr 30;16:1390699. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2024.1390699. eCollection 2024.
Research has increasingly suggested a benefit to combining multiple cognitive or behavioral strategies in a single treatment program for cognitively impaired older adults. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to summarize results on the effects of multimodal cognitive and behavioral interventions versus control conditions on changes in cognition and mood in patients with mild cognitive impairment (pwMCI).
The review followed a general PRISMA guideline for systematic literature review with a format consisting of participants, interventions, comparators, and outcomes (PICO). Multilevel meta-analyses of aggregated efficacy were performed to assess the pooled effect sizes for cognitive and mood outcomes. Risk-of-bias, heterogeneity across studies, and publication bias were assessed for each outcome.
After primary and reference searches, 18 studies with low or some concerns of risk of bias were included. Low heterogeneity was found for mood and cognition. Funnel plots did not indicate publication bias. All the studies assessed changes in cognition ( = 1,555) while seven studies with mood outcomes ( = 343) were included. Multilevel meta-analyses demonstrated moderate effect (Hedge's = 0.44, 95% CI = [0.21-0.67]) in cognitive outcomes and large effect in mood ( = 0.65, 95% CI = [0.37-0.93]). Subdomain analyses found low-moderate effects in global cognition, verbal and non-verbal memory, executive function, visuospatial abilities, and semantic fluency (0.20 < < 0.50).
These findings showed comparable to larger effects of multimodal cognitive and behavioral interventions on cognition than pharmacological treatment. Future studies should focus on the longitudinal effects of multimodal interventions in delaying dementia.: PROSEPRO, CRD42022349297.
越来越多的研究表明,在针对认知受损老年人的单一治疗方案中结合多种认知或行为策略有益。因此,本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在总结多模式认知和行为干预与对照条件相比,对轻度认知障碍患者(pwMCI)认知和情绪变化的影响结果。
本评价遵循系统文献评价的一般PRISMA指南,采用由参与者、干预措施、对照和结局(PICO)组成的格式。进行汇总疗效的多水平荟萃分析,以评估认知和情绪结局的合并效应量。对每个结局评估偏倚风险、研究间的异质性和发表偏倚。
在初步检索和参考文献检索后,纳入了18项存在低或一些偏倚风险问题的研究。发现情绪和认知方面的异质性较低。漏斗图未显示发表偏倚。所有研究均评估了认知变化(n = 1,555),同时纳入了7项有情绪结局的研究(n = 343)。多水平荟萃分析显示认知结局有中度效应(Hedge's g = 0.44,95%CI = [0.21 - 0.67]),情绪方面有较大效应(g = 0.65,95%CI = [0.37 - 0.93])。子领域分析发现,在整体认知、言语和非言语记忆、执行功能、视觉空间能力和语义流畅性方面有低至中度效应(0.20 < g < 0.50)。
这些发现表明,多模式认知和行为干预对认知的影响与药物治疗相当甚至更大。未来的研究应关注多模式干预在延缓痴呆方面的纵向效应。:PROSEPRO,CRD42022349297