Suppr超能文献

粘结剂应用方法对复合材料修复粘结强度的影响。

Effect of adhesive application method on repair bond strength of composite.

作者信息

Oh Hee Kyeong, Shin Dong Hoon

机构信息

Department of Conservative Dentistry, Graduate School, Dankook University College of Dentistry, Cheonan, Korea.

出版信息

Restor Dent Endod. 2021 Jun 4;46(3):e32. doi: 10.5395/rde.2021.46.e32. eCollection 2021 Aug.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of the application method of universal adhesives on the shear bond strength (SBS) of repaired composites, applied with different thicknesses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The 84 specimens (Filtek Z350 XT) were prepared, stored in distilled water for a week and thermocycled (5,000 cycles, 5°C to 55°C). They were roughened using 400-grit sandpapers and etched with phosphoric acid. Then, specimens were equally divided into 2 groups; Single Bond Universal (SU) and Prime&Bond Universal (PB). Each group was subdivided into 3 subgroups according to application methods ( = 14); UC: 1 coat + uncuring, 1C: 1 coat + curing, 3C: 3 coats + curing. After storage of the repaired composite for 24 hours, specimens were subjected to the SBS test and the data were statistically analyzed by 2-way analysis of variance and independent -tests. Specimens were examined with a stereomicroscope to analyze fracture mode and a scanning electron microscope to observe the interface.

RESULTS

Adhesive material was a significant factor ( = 0.001). Bond strengths with SU were higher than PB. The highest strength was obtained from the 1C group with SU. Bonding in multiple layers increased adhesive thicknesses, but there was no significant difference in SBS values ( = 0.255). Failure mode was predominantly cohesive in old composites.

CONCLUSIONS

The application of an adequate bonding system plays an important role in repairing composite resin. SU showed higher SBS than PB and the additional layers increased the adhesive thickness without affecting SBS.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估通用粘结剂的应用方法对不同厚度修复复合材料剪切粘结强度(SBS)的影响。

材料与方法

制备84个试件(Filtek Z350 XT),在蒸馏水中储存一周并进行热循环(5000次循环,5°C至55°C)。使用400目砂纸对其进行粗化处理,并用磷酸蚀刻。然后,将试件平均分为2组;单键通用粘结剂(SU)和底涂&键合通用粘结剂(PB)。根据应用方法,每组再细分为3个亚组( = 14);UC:1层涂抹+未固化,1C:1层涂抹+固化,3C:3层涂抹+固化。修复后的复合材料储存24小时后,对试件进行SBS测试,并通过双向方差分析和独立检验对数据进行统计分析。用立体显微镜检查试件以分析断裂模式,并用扫描电子显微镜观察界面。

结果

粘结剂材料是一个显著因素( = 0.001)。SU的粘结强度高于PB。SU的1C组获得了最高强度。多层粘结增加了粘结剂厚度,但SBS值没有显著差异( = 0.255)。旧复合材料的失效模式主要为内聚破坏。

结论

应用合适的粘结系统在修复复合树脂中起着重要作用。SU的SBS高于PB,额外的涂层增加了粘结剂厚度但不影响SBS。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55cd/8411008/4aa9d0671b68/rde-46-e32-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验