• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用Medin、RaCe和ProTaper旋转系统进行根管预备时碎屑根尖挤出情况的比较

A Comparison of the Apical Extrusion of Debris during the Preparation of Root Canal with Medin, RaCe, and ProTaper Rotary Systems.

作者信息

Nabavizadeh Mohammadreza, Shokouhi Mohammad Mehdi, Kheirandish Mojgan, Sahebi Safoora, Sadatshojaee Nooshin, Abbaszadegan Abbas

机构信息

Oral and Dental Disease Research Center, Dept. of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

Dept. of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

出版信息

J Dent (Shiraz). 2021 Sep;22(3):193-197. doi: 10.30476/DENTJODS.2020.84776.1100.

DOI:10.30476/DENTJODS.2020.84776.1100
PMID:34514067
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8417540/
Abstract

STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM

The extrusion of intracanal debris is one of the challenging problems related to almost all root canal preparation systems, which may cause flare-ups and impairment in the healing process.

PURPOSE

This study was conducted to evaluate the amount of apically-extruded debris during root canal preparation using Medin (MEDIN Co., Czech Republic) rotary system compared with two common rotary systems, including ProTaper (Dentsply Maillefer., Switzerland) and RaCe (FKG Dentaire, Switzerland).

MATERIALS AND METHOD

In this study, Sixty mandibular premolars with single canal were randomly assigned to three groups (n=20). The root canals were prepared with Medin, ProTaper, and RaCe rotary instruments based on their manufacturers' instructions. The debris were collected into pre-weighted Eppendorf tubes. The weight of the extruded debris was calculated by subtracting the pretreatment weight of the vials. Data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test at a 5% significance level.

RESULTS

Medin instrument caused significantly less debris extrusion in comparison with ProTaper and RaCe (< 0.05). The differences between the ProTaper and RaCe rotary systems were not statistically significant (= 0.752).

CONCLUSION

Within the limitations of this study, Medin rotary system produced less apical extrusion than ProTaper and RaCe.

摘要

问题陈述

根管内碎屑的挤出是几乎所有根管预备系统都面临的具有挑战性的问题之一,这可能会导致炎症发作并损害愈合过程。

目的

本研究旨在评估使用Medin(捷克共和国MEDIN公司)旋转系统进行根管预备时根尖挤出碎屑的量,并与两种常见的旋转系统ProTaper(瑞士登士柏迈耶公司)和RaCe(瑞士FKG牙科)进行比较。

材料与方法

在本研究中,将60颗单根管下颌前磨牙随机分为三组(n = 20)。根据制造商的说明,使用Medin、ProTaper和RaCe旋转器械对根管进行预备。将碎屑收集到预先称重的Eppendorf管中。通过减去小瓶的预处理重量来计算挤出碎屑的重量。使用Kruskal-Wallis检验在5%的显著性水平上分析数据。

结果

与ProTaper和RaCe相比,Medin器械导致的碎屑挤出明显更少(<0.05)。ProTaper和RaCe旋转系统之间的差异无统计学意义(= 0.752)。

结论

在本研究的局限性内,Medin旋转系统产生的根尖挤出比ProTaper和RaCe少。

相似文献

1
A Comparison of the Apical Extrusion of Debris during the Preparation of Root Canal with Medin, RaCe, and ProTaper Rotary Systems.使用Medin、RaCe和ProTaper旋转系统进行根管预备时碎屑根尖挤出情况的比较
J Dent (Shiraz). 2021 Sep;22(3):193-197. doi: 10.30476/DENTJODS.2020.84776.1100.
2
Evaluation of debris extruded apically during the removal of root canal filling material using ProTaper, D-RaCe, and R-Endo rotary nickel-titanium retreatment instruments and hand files.使用ProTaper、D-RaCe和R-Endo旋转镍钛再治疗器械及手动锉去除根管充填材料时根尖挤出碎屑的评估。
J Endod. 2014 Dec;40(12):2066-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.09.004. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
3
In Vitro Comparison of Apically Extruded Debris during Root Canal Preparation of Mandibular Premolars with Manual and Rotary Instruments.下颌前磨牙根管预备时手动器械与旋转器械根尖部碎屑排出的体外比较
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2015 Summer;9(3):131-7. doi: 10.15171/joddd.2015.026. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
4
Quantitative evaluation of apical extrusion of debris and irrigants using four rotary instrumentation systems: an in vitro study.使用四种旋转器械系统对碎屑和冲洗液根尖挤出量的定量评估:一项体外研究
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2013 Nov 1;14(6):1065-9. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1452.
5
Comparative evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal preparation using ProTaper™, Hyflex™ and Waveone™ rotary systems.使用ProTaper™、Hyflex™和Waveone™旋转系统进行根管预备时根尖挤出碎屑的比较评估。
J Conserv Dent. 2014 Mar;17(2):129-32. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.128045.
6
Effects of Different Glide Path Files on Apical Debris Extrusion in Curved Root Canals.不同导丝路径锉对弯曲根管内根尖碎屑推出的影响。
J Endod. 2018 Jul;44(7):1191-1194. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2018.04.012. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
7
Quantitative evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal instrumentation with ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Next, WaveOne, and self-adjusting file systems.使用ProTaper Universal、ProTaper Next、WaveOne和自调式锉系统进行根管预备时根尖部挤出碎屑的定量评估。
Eur J Dent. 2014 Oct;8(4):504-508. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.143633.
8
Comparison of apical debris extrusion during root canal preparation using instrumentation techniques with two operating principles: An study.使用具有两种操作原理的器械技术进行根管预备期间根尖碎屑挤出情况的比较:一项研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2017 Mar-Apr;20(2):96-99. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.212239.
9
Evaluation of Apically Extruded Debris from Curved Root Canal Filling Removal Using 5 Nickel-Titanium Systems.使用5种镍钛系统评估弯曲根管充填物去除后根尖挤出碎屑的情况。
J Endod. 2016 Jul;42(7):1101-4. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.03.012. Epub 2016 May 11.
10
Evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal retreatment with two different rotary systems followed by a self-adjusting file.使用两种不同的旋转系统进行根管再治疗后,接着使用自调式锉对根尖挤出碎屑的评估。
Int J Artif Organs. 2016 Feb;39(2):68-71. doi: 10.5301/ijao.5000467. Epub 2016 Feb 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Nickel-titanium instruments in endodontics: a concise review of the state of the art.牙髓病学中的镍钛器械:最新技术综述
Braz Oral Res. 2018 Oct 18;32(suppl 1):e67. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0067.
2
Comparison of apical debris extrusion during root canal preparation using instrumentation techniques with two operating principles: An study.使用具有两种操作原理的器械技术进行根管预备期间根尖碎屑挤出情况的比较:一项研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2017 Mar-Apr;20(2):96-99. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.212239.
3
In Vitro Comparison of Apically Extruded Debris during Root Canal Preparation of Mandibular Premolars with Manual and Rotary Instruments.
下颌前磨牙根管预备时手动器械与旋转器械根尖部碎屑排出的体外比较
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2015 Summer;9(3):131-7. doi: 10.15171/joddd.2015.026. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
4
An in vitro comparison of apically extruded debris and instrumentation times with ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Next, Twisted File Adaptive, and HyFlex instruments.使用ProTaper Universal、ProTaper Next、Twisted File Adaptive和HyFlex器械对根尖挤出碎屑和预备时间进行的体外比较。
J Endod. 2014 Oct;40(10):1638-41. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.04.004. Epub 2014 May 27.
5
Centering ability and dentin removal of rotary systems in curved root canals.弯曲根管中旋转系统的定心能力和牙本质去除情况
Iran Endod J. 2009 Summer;4(3):91-5. Epub 2009 Jul 6.
6
Quantitative evaluation of apical extrusion of intracanal bacteria using K3, Mtwo, RaCe and protaper rotary systems: An in vitro study.使用K3、Mtwo、RaCe和Protaper旋转系统对根管内细菌根尖挤出的定量评估:一项体外研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2013 Jul;16(4):300-3. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.114353.
7
Shaping ability of nickel-titanium rotary instruments in curved root canals.镍钛旋转器械在弯曲根管中的塑形能力。
Iran Endod J. 2013 Spring;8(2):55-8. Epub 2013 May 1.
8
Apical extrusion of debris: a literature review of an inherent occurrence during root canal treatment.根管治疗过程中固有现象的文献复习:根管内玷污物流出
Int Endod J. 2014 Mar;47(3):211-21. doi: 10.1111/iej.12137. Epub 2013 May 25.
9
Microscopic evaluation of cleaning efficiency of three different nickel-titanium rotary instruments.三种不同镍钛旋转器械清洁效率的微观评估
Iran Endod J. 2010 Fall;5(4):174-8. Epub 2010 Nov 15.
10
Debris and irrigant extrusion potential of 2 rotary systems and irrigation needles.两种旋转系统和冲洗针的碎屑及冲洗液挤出可能性
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011 Oct;112(4):e31-5. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.03.044. Epub 2011 Jul 20.