Suppr超能文献

认知中是否存在可靠的质性个体差异?可能不存在。

Are there Reliable Qualitative Individual Differences in Cognition? Probably Not.

作者信息

von Bastian Claudia C

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Cathedral Court, 1 Vicar Lane, Sheffield S1 1HD, UK.

出版信息

J Cogn. 2021 Aug 27;4(1):52. doi: 10.5334/joc.174. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Rouder and Haaf (2021, this issue) propose a focus shift toward qualitative individual differences in cognition and present a research toolkit for doing so. In this invited commentary, I will argue that the observation of qualitative individual differences may be no more than an indicator that more theoretical and empirical work needs to be done to identify the mechanisms and abilities underlying these individual differences in directionality. I will then move on to discuss how the toolkit can be used though to investigate one of the currently most central current topics in cognitive differential psychology, that is, the question over the existence of true quantitative individual differences in attentional control experimental effects. I conclude that, while highly valuable, no toolkit can save us from facing the challenging theoretical and conceptual questions in this area.

摘要

劳德和哈夫(2021年,本期)提议将重点转向认知方面的质性个体差异,并为此提供了一套研究工具。在这篇特邀评论中,我将指出,对质性个体差异的观察可能仅仅表明,需要开展更多的理论和实证研究,以确定这些方向性个体差异背后的机制和能力。然后,我将继续讨论如何运用这套工具来研究认知差异心理学当前最核心的主题之一,即注意力控制实验效应中真正的量化个体差异是否存在的问题。我得出的结论是,虽然这套工具非常有价值,但没有任何工具能让我们免于面对该领域具有挑战性的理论和概念问题。

相似文献

1
Are there Reliable Qualitative Individual Differences in Cognition? Probably Not.
J Cogn. 2021 Aug 27;4(1):52. doi: 10.5334/joc.174. eCollection 2021.
2
Do Individual Effects Reflect Quantitative or Qualitative Differences in Cognition?
J Cogn. 2021 Aug 27;4(1):50. doi: 10.5334/joc.171. eCollection 2021.
3
Qualitative Individual Differences are Useful, but Reliability Should be Assessed and Not Assumed.
J Cogn. 2021 Aug 27;4(1):48. doi: 10.5334/joc.169. eCollection 2021.
4
A Plea for Studying Qualitative Individual Differences by Default.
J Cogn. 2021 Aug 27;4(1):51. doi: 10.5334/joc.172. eCollection 2021.
5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
6
When Average is Over: Small N but Many Trials.
J Cogn. 2021 Aug 27;4(1):47. doi: 10.5334/joc.168. eCollection 2021.
7
Comparative psychometrics: establishing what differs is central to understanding what evolves.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018 Sep 26;373(1756). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0283.
9
Are There Reliable Qualitative Individual Difference in Cognition?
J Cogn. 2021 Aug 27;4(1):46. doi: 10.5334/joc.131. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Are There Reliable Qualitative Individual Difference in Cognition?
J Cogn. 2021 Aug 27;4(1):46. doi: 10.5334/joc.131. eCollection 2021.
2
A toolbox approach to improving the measurement of attention control.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2021 Feb;150(2):242-275. doi: 10.1037/xge0000783. Epub 2020 Jul 23.
3
Is executive control related to working memory capacity and fluid intelligence?
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2019 Aug;148(8):1335-1372. doi: 10.1037/xge0000593. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
4
A psychometrics of individual differences in experimental tasks.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Apr;26(2):452-467. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1558-y.
5
Working memory updating and binding training: Bayesian evidence supporting the absence of transfer.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2018 Jun;147(6):829-858. doi: 10.1037/xge0000453.
6
Working memory training in older adults: Bayesian evidence supporting the absence of transfer.
Psychol Aging. 2017 Dec;32(8):732-746. doi: 10.1037/pag0000206.
7
Should we stop thinking about inhibition? Searching for individual and age differences in inhibition ability.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2018 Apr;44(4):501-526. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000450. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
8
The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences.
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Jun;50(3):1166-1186. doi: 10.3758/s13428-017-0935-1.
9
Shifting between mental sets: An individual differences approach to commonalities and differences of task switching components.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2017 Sep;146(9):1266-1285. doi: 10.1037/xge0000333. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
10
The role of test-retest reliability in measuring individual and group differences in executive functioning.
J Neurosci Methods. 2016 Dec 1;274:81-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2016.10.002. Epub 2016 Oct 6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验