Suppr超能文献

经外周Impella®泵左心室卸载对 eCPR 患者的影响。

Impact of left ventricular unloading using a peripheral Impella®-pump in eCPR patients.

机构信息

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

出版信息

Artif Organs. 2022 Mar;46(3):451-459. doi: 10.1111/aor.14067. Epub 2021 Sep 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR) is a rapidly growing treatment strategy due to increasing survival rates in selected patients. Additional left ventricular mechanical unloading, using a transfemoral micro-axial blood pump (Impella® Denver, Massachusetts, USA), might improve patients' outcomes. In this regard, we sought to investigate patients who suffered OHCA (out-of hospital cardiac arrest) or IHCA (in-hospital cardiac arrest) with subsequent eCPR via VA-ECMO (veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation) and concomitant Impella® implantation based on survival and feasibility of ECMO weaning.

METHODS

From January 2016 until December 2020, 108 patients underwent eCPR at our institution. Data prior to eCPR and early outcome parameters were analyzed comparing patients who were supported with an additional Impella® (2.5 or CP) (ECMO+Impella®, n = 18) and patients without additional (ECMO, n = 90) support during V-A ECMO therapy. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality; secondary endpoints were, among others: ECMO explantation, need for hemodialysis, stroke, and need for blood transfusions.

RESULTS

Low-flow time was significantly lower in the ECMO+Impella group (60 min vs. 55 min, p = .01). All-cause mortality was significantly lower in the ECMO+Impella® group (82% vs. 56%, p = .01). The time of circulatory support was shorter in the ECMO cohort (2.0 ± 1.73 vs. 4.76 ± 2.88 p = .05). ECMO decannulation was significantly more feasible in patients with ECMO+Impella® (72% vs. 32%, p = .01). Patients treated with additional Impella® showed significantly more acute kidney injury with the need for dialysis (72% vs. 18%, p ≤ .01).

CONCLUSION

Concomitant Impella® support might positively influence survival and ECMO weaning in eCPR patients. Treatment-associated complications such as the need for dialysis were more common in this highly selected patient group. Further studies with larger numbers are necessary to evaluate the clinical relevance of concomitant LV-unloading in eCPR patients using an Impella® device.

摘要

背景

由于在选定的患者中生存率的提高,体外心肺复苏(eCPR)是一种快速发展的治疗策略。使用经股微型轴向血泵(Impella®丹佛,马萨诸塞州,美国)进行额外的左心室机械卸载可能会改善患者的预后。在这方面,我们试图调查因 OHCA(院外心脏骤停)或 IHCA(院内心脏骤停)而接受 VA-ECMO(静脉-动脉体外膜氧合)治疗并同时植入 Impella®的患者,根据 ECMO 脱机的生存和可行性,研究后续 eCPR。

方法

从 2016 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月,我院共进行了 108 例 eCPR。在比较接受额外 Impella®(2.5 或 CP)(ECMO+Impella®,n=18)和未接受额外 Impella®(ECMO,n=90)支持的患者时,分析了 eCPR 前和早期预后参数。主要终点为院内死亡率;次要终点包括 ECMO 脱离、需要血液透析、中风和需要输血。

结果

在 ECMO+Impella 组,低流量时间明显更低(60min vs.55min,p=0.01)。ECMO+Impella®组全因死亡率明显较低(82%vs.56%,p=0.01)。ECMO 组的循环支持时间较短(2.0±1.73vs.4.76±2.88,p=0.05)。ECMO+Impella®组 ECMO 脱机更可行(72%vs.32%,p=0.01)。接受额外 Impella®治疗的患者发生急性肾损伤并需要透析的比例明显更高(72%vs.18%,p≤0.01)。

结论

在 eCPR 患者中,同时使用 Impella®支持可能会对生存率和 ECMO 脱机产生积极影响。在这个高度选择的患者群体中,治疗相关并发症,如需要透析的并发症更为常见。需要进一步进行更大规模的研究,以评估使用 Impella®装置对 eCPR 患者进行左心室卸载的临床相关性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验