Suppr超能文献

微创 Ivor Lewis 食管切除术的再次手术。

Reoperative Surgery After Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy.

机构信息

Department of Surgery.

Center for Data Solutions, University of Florida College of Medicine.

出版信息

Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2021 Sep 9;32(1):60-65. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000996.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to identify factors influencing reoperations following minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy and associated mortality and hospital costs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 2013 and 2018, 125 patients were retrospectively analyzed. Outcomes included reoperations, mortality, and hospital costs. Multivariable logistic regression analyses determined factors associated with reoperations.

RESULTS

In-hospital reoperations (n=10) were associated with in-hospital mortality (n=3, P<0.01), higher hospital costs (P<0.01), and longer hospital stay (P<0.01). Conversely, reoperations after discharge were not associated with mortality. By multivariable analysis, baseline cardiovascular (P=0.02) and chronic kidney disease (P=0.01) were associated with reoperations. However, anastomotic leaks were not associated with reoperations nor mortality.

CONCLUSION

The majority of reoperations occur within 30 days often during index hospitalization. Reoperations were associated with increased in-hospital mortality and hospital costs. Notably, anastomotic leaks did not influence reoperations nor mortality. Efforts to optimize patient baseline comorbidities should be emphasized to minimize reoperations following minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定影响微创 Ivor Lewis 食管切除术术后再次手术的因素,以及与死亡率和住院费用相关的因素。

材料和方法

对 2013 年至 2018 年间的 125 例患者进行回顾性分析。结果包括再次手术、死亡率和住院费用。多变量逻辑回归分析确定了与再次手术相关的因素。

结果

院内再次手术(n=10)与院内死亡率(n=3,P<0.01)、更高的住院费用(P<0.01)和更长的住院时间(P<0.01)相关。相反,出院后的再次手术与死亡率无关。通过多变量分析,基线心血管疾病(P=0.02)和慢性肾脏病(P=0.01)与再次手术相关。然而,吻合口漏与再次手术或死亡率无关。

结论

大多数再次手术发生在 30 天内,通常在住院期间。再次手术与住院期间死亡率和住院费用增加相关。值得注意的是,吻合口漏并不影响再次手术或死亡率。应强调优化患者基线合并症的措施,以尽量减少微创 Ivor Lewis 食管切除术后的再次手术。

相似文献

1
Reoperative Surgery After Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy.
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2021 Sep 9;32(1):60-65. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000996.
3
[Clinical observation on perioperative complications of minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis and minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy].
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2022 Jun 23;44(6):577-580. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20200704-00626.
5
A standardized comparison of peri-operative complications after minimally invasive esophagectomy: Ivor Lewis versus McKeown.
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jan;32(1):204-211. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5660-4. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
6
Surgical outcomes after totally minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2022 Mar;48(3):473-481. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.11.119. Epub 2021 Dec 20.
8
Open versus hybrid versus totally minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Dec;164(6):e233-e254. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.12.051. Epub 2022 Jan 18.
9
Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy (MILE): technique and outcomes of 100 consecutive cases.
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jul;34(7):3243-3255. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07529-0. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
10
A preliminary experience with minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.
Dis Esophagus. 2012 Jul;25(5):449-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2011.01269.x. Epub 2011 Oct 3.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Drivers of Cost Associated With Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2022 Jan;113(1):264-270. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.01.023. Epub 2021 Jan 29.
2
Postoperative complications of minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2020 Feb 12;4(2):126-134. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12315. eCollection 2020 Mar.
3
Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy (MILE): technique and outcomes of 100 consecutive cases.
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jul;34(7):3243-3255. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07529-0. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
6
Mortality After Esophagectomy: Analysis of Individual Complications and Their Association with Mortality.
J Gastrointest Surg. 2020 Sep;24(9):1948-1954. doi: 10.1007/s11605-019-04346-2. Epub 2019 Aug 13.
7
Risk factors for anastomotic leak after esophagectomy for cancer: A NSQIP procedure-targeted analysis.
J Surg Oncol. 2019 Sep;120(4):661-669. doi: 10.1002/jso.25613. Epub 2019 Jul 10.
8
Cardiorespiratory Comorbidity and Postoperative Complications following Esophagectomy: a European Multicenter Cohort Study.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Sep;26(9):2864-2873. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07478-6. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
9
Relative Incremental Cost of Postoperative Complications of Esophagectomy.
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Summer;31(2):290-299. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2018.10.010. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
10
Excess Cost and Predictive Factors of Esophagectomy Complications in the SEER-Medicare Database.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2018 Nov;106(5):1484-1491. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.05.062. Epub 2018 Jun 23.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验