Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology, Osnabrück University, Osnabrück, Germany.
Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology, Tübingen University, Tübingen, Germany.
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 13;16(9):e0257303. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257303. eCollection 2021.
Mirror exposure (ME) is an effective technique to improve body image. However, evidence on the underlying mechanisms and the optimal verbalization instruction during ME is lacking. Therefore, this experimental study analyzed mechanisms of ME and therapeutic outcomes by comparing positive (PV) and negative (NV) full-body verbalization. N = 73 healthy females were randomized to a PV or an NV condition. PV participants verbalized positively while NV participants verbalized negatively about their whole body. Each participant underwent three standardized ME sessions. Before and after each ME session, positive affect, negative affect and body satisfaction were assessed. Before the first and after the third ME, participants completed questionnaires on cognitive-affective and behavioral aspects of body image, eating pathology and self-esteem. Regarding within-ME changes, the results indicate that positive affect and body satisfaction decreased while negative affect increased in the NV group but not in the PV group. In contrast, regarding between-ME changes, decreased negative affect as well as positive affect and increased body satisfaction were observed in both groups. However, eating pathology remained stable, whereas body-checking behavior increased and the PV condition was followed by higher levels of self-esteem compared to the NV condition. These findings suggest that both PV and NV improve negative affect and body satisfaction between-ME, and thus seem to be effective ME instructions. Given that NV led to increased negative affect within-ME and did not influence self-esteem, PV might represent the favorable instruction during ME for body-satisfied women.
镜像暴露(ME)是一种改善身体形象的有效技术。然而,关于其潜在机制和 ME 过程中最佳言语指导的证据尚缺乏。因此,本实验研究通过比较阳性(PV)和阴性(NV)全身言语化,分析了 ME 的机制和治疗效果。共有 73 名健康女性被随机分配到 PV 或 NV 条件。PV 组参与者积极地描述自己的身体,而 NV 组参与者则消极地描述自己的身体。每位参与者接受三次标准化 ME 疗程。在每次 ME 疗程前后,评估积极情绪、消极情绪和身体满意度。在第一次 ME 疗程前后,参与者完成了关于身体意象的认知-情感和行为方面、进食障碍和自尊的问卷。关于 ME 过程中的变化,结果表明,在 NV 组中,积极情绪和身体满意度下降,而消极情绪增加,但在 PV 组中则没有这种变化。相比之下,关于 ME 之间的变化,在两组中都观察到消极情绪的减少以及积极情绪和身体满意度的增加。然而,进食障碍仍然稳定,而身体检查行为增加,与 NV 条件相比,PV 条件后自尊水平更高。这些发现表明,PV 和 NV 都可以改善 ME 之间的消极情绪和身体满意度,因此似乎是有效的 ME 指导。鉴于 NV 在 ME 过程中导致了消极情绪的增加,并且没有影响自尊,对于身体满意的女性来说,PV 可能代表了有利的 ME 指导。