Suppr超能文献

7种不同简单功能测试方案的参考值:一项多中心研究

Reference Values for 7 Different Protocols of Simple Functional Tests: A Multicenter Study.

作者信息

Furlanetto Karina Couto, Correia Natielly Soares, Mesquita Rafael, Morita Andrea Akemi, do Amaral Daniel Pereira, Mont'Alverne Daniela Gardano Bucharles, Pereira Daniel Martins, Pitta Fabio, Dal Corso Simone

机构信息

Stricto Sensu Graduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, University Pitágoras Unopar, Londrina, Paraná; Laboratory of Research in Respiratory Physiotherapy, Health Sciences Center, State University of Londrina (UEL), Londrina, Paraná; Graduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Universidade Nove de Julho(UNINOVE), São Paulo, São Paulo.

Stricto Sensu Graduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, University Pitágoras Unopar, Londrina, Paraná; Laboratory of Research in Respiratory Physiotherapy, Health Sciences Center, State University of Londrina (UEL), Londrina, Paraná.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 Jan;103(1):20-28.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2021.08.009. Epub 2021 Sep 10.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To establish reference values and equations (ages 20-80y) for 7 simple functional tests based on a multicenter study.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional data collection in 4 research centers across different regions of a continental dimension country.

SETTING

Healthy subjects from general community were assessed in different research laboratories.

PARTICIPANTS

Data collection of 296 volunteer subjects (N=296; 45% men; aged 50±18y, forced expiratory volume in the first second 95±13% pred, body mass index 26.9±4.5 kg/m) aged 20-80 years; representing both sexes; with the ability to understand and perform all proposed assessments; and with no severe and/or unstable condition that could limit functional assessments occurred simultaneously in all centers.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

All participants randomly performed the following 7 functional tests twice: (1) the 4-meter gait speed test at usual walking speed; (2) the 4-meter gait speed test at maximal walking speed; (3) the Sit-to-Stand test performed with 5 repetitions; (4) the Sit-to-Stand test performed in 30 seconds; (5) the Sit-to-Stand test performed in 1 minute; (6) the Timed Up and Go test at usual speed; and (7) the Timed Up and Go test at maximal speed. Spirometry, quality of life, depression, anxiety, physical activity, and comorbidities were also assessed to better characterize the sample. The best performance of each test was used to propose reference values for men and women and reference equations for all.

RESULTS

Participants similarly distributed by age groups from the 4 centers were included. All tests were correlated with age (0.34<r<0.53) and body mass index (0.24<r< 0.31; P<.05 for all). Reference values with limits of normality were provided by each 10-year age group and regression models identified reference equations for all tests. Reliability of the reference equations were confirmed in an independent sample.

CONCLUSIONS

Reference values and equations for 7 widely used simple functional tests were provided in this study and might help researchers and clinicians to identify and quantify functional impairments using easy-to-perform assessments.

摘要

目的

基于一项多中心研究,建立7项简单功能测试的参考值和方程(年龄20 - 80岁)。

设计

在一个地域广阔国家不同地区的4个研究中心进行横断面数据收集。

背景

在不同研究实验室对来自普通社区的健康受试者进行评估。

参与者

收集了296名20 - 80岁志愿者的数据(N = 296;45%为男性;年龄50±18岁,第一秒用力呼气量为预计值的95±13%,体重指数26.9±4.5 kg/m²);涵盖男女两性;有能力理解并完成所有提议的评估;且在所有中心均未同时出现可能限制功能评估的严重和/或不稳定状况。

干预措施

不适用。

主要观察指标

所有参与者随机进行以下7项功能测试各两次:(1)以平常步行速度进行4米步态速度测试;(2)以最大步行速度进行4米步态速度测试;(3)进行5次重复的坐立试验;(4)在30秒内进行坐立试验;(5)在1分钟内进行坐立试验;(6)以平常速度进行计时起立行走测试;(7)以最大速度进行计时起立行走测试。还评估了肺活量测定、生活质量、抑郁、焦虑、身体活动及合并症,以更好地描述样本特征。每项测试的最佳表现用于提出男女的参考值以及所有测试的参考方程。

结果

纳入了来自4个中心按年龄组相似分布的参与者。所有测试均与年龄(0.34 < r < 0.53)和体重指数(0.24 < r < 0.31;所有P <.05)相关。每个10岁年龄组提供了具有正常范围的参考值,回归模型确定了所有测试的参考方程。参考方程的可靠性在一个独立样本中得到证实。

结论

本研究提供了7项广泛使用的简单功能测试的参考值和方程,可能有助于研究人员和临床医生通过易于进行的评估来识别和量化功能损害。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验