• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

简化模型评估中低收入国家新生儿胎龄:一项多国家前瞻性队列研究的结果。

Simplified models to assess newborn gestational age in low-middle income countries: findings from a multicountry, prospective cohort study.

出版信息

BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Sep;6(9). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005688.

DOI:10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005688
PMID:34518201
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8438948/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Preterm birth is the leading cause of child mortality. This study aimed to develop and validate programmatically feasible and accurate approaches to estimate newborn gestational age (GA) in low resource settings.

METHODS

The WHO Alliance for Maternal and Newborn Health Improvement (AMANHI) study recruited pregnant women from population-based cohorts in five countries (Bangladesh, Ghana, Pakistan, Tanzania and Zambia). Women <20 weeks gestation by ultrasound-based dating were enrolled. Research staff assessed newborns for: (1) anthropometry, (2) neuromuscular/physical signs and (3) feeding maturity. Machine-learning techniques were used to construct ensemble models. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed by areas under the receiver operating curve (AUC) and Bland-Altman analysis.

RESULTS

7428 liveborn infants were included (n=536 preterm, <37 weeks). The Ballard examination was biased compared with ultrasound dating (mean difference: +9 days) with 95% limits of agreement (LOA) -15.3 to 33.6 days (precision ±24.5 days). A model including 10 newborn characteristics (birth weight, head circumference, chest circumference, foot length, breast bud diameter, breast development, plantar creases, skin texture, ankle dorsiflexion and infant sex) estimated GA with no bias, 95% LOA ±17.3 days and an AUC=0.88 for classifying the preterm infant. A model that included last menstrual period (LMP) with the 10 characteristics had 95% LOA ±15.7 days and high diagnostic accuracy (AUC 0.91). An alternative simpler model including birth weight and LMP had 95% LOA of ±16.7 and an AUC of 0.88.

CONCLUSION

The best machine-learning model (10 neonatal characteristics and LMP) estimated GA within ±15.7 days of early ultrasound dating. Simpler models performed reasonably well with marginal increases in prediction error. These models hold promise for newborn GA estimation when ultrasound dating is unavailable.

摘要

引言

早产是儿童死亡的主要原因。本研究旨在开发和验证在资源有限环境下,具有可操作性且准确的方法来估计新生儿胎龄(GA)。

方法

世界卫生组织孕产妇和新生儿健康改善联盟(AMANHI)研究从五个国家(孟加拉国、加纳、巴基斯坦、坦桑尼亚和赞比亚)的基于人群的队列中招募了孕妇。对超声检测<20 周的孕妇进行入组。研究人员评估新生儿:(1)人体测量学,(2)神经肌肉/生理体征和(3)喂养成熟度。使用机器学习技术构建集成模型。通过接收者操作特征曲线(AUC)下面积和 Bland-Altman 分析评估诊断准确性。

结果

共纳入 7428 例活产婴儿(536 例早产,<37 周)。与超声检测相比, Ballard 检查存在偏倚(平均差值:+9 天),95%的一致性区间(LOA)为-15.3 至 33.6 天(精度±24.5 天)。一个包含 10 个新生儿特征(出生体重、头围、胸围、脚长、乳芽直径、乳房发育、足底折痕、皮肤质地、踝关节背屈和婴儿性别)的模型估计 GA 没有偏差,95% LOA ±17.3 天,分类早产婴儿的 AUC=0.88。一个包含末次月经周期(LMP)和 10 个特征的模型具有 95% LOA ±15.7 天和高诊断准确性(AUC 0.91)。一个更简单的模型,包含出生体重和 LMP,95% LOA 为±16.7,AUC 为 0.88。

结论

最好的机器学习模型(10 个新生儿特征和 LMP)在超声早期检测的 15.7 天内估计 GA。更简单的模型表现相当好,预测误差略有增加。这些模型在超声检测不可用时,有望用于估计新生儿 GA。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff85/8438948/8ebc72f630de/bmjgh-2021-005688f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff85/8438948/46a47f0be306/bmjgh-2021-005688f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff85/8438948/0c8f99c440cb/bmjgh-2021-005688f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff85/8438948/0187e7e12ace/bmjgh-2021-005688f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff85/8438948/8ebc72f630de/bmjgh-2021-005688f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff85/8438948/46a47f0be306/bmjgh-2021-005688f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff85/8438948/0c8f99c440cb/bmjgh-2021-005688f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff85/8438948/0187e7e12ace/bmjgh-2021-005688f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff85/8438948/8ebc72f630de/bmjgh-2021-005688f04.jpg

相似文献

1
Simplified models to assess newborn gestational age in low-middle income countries: findings from a multicountry, prospective cohort study.简化模型评估中低收入国家新生儿胎龄:一项多国家前瞻性队列研究的结果。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Sep;6(9). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005688.
2
Improving preterm newborn identification in low-resource settings with machine learning.利用机器学习提高资源匮乏环境中早产儿的识别率。
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 27;14(2):e0198919. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198919. eCollection 2019.
3
Development and validation of a simplified algorithm for neonatal gestational age assessment - protocol for the Alliance for Maternal Newborn Health Improvement (AMANHI) prospective cohort study.新生儿胎龄评估简化算法的开发与验证——孕产妇新生儿健康改善联盟(AMANHI)前瞻性队列研究方案
J Glob Health. 2017 Dec;7(2):021201. doi: 10.7189/jogh.07.021201.
4
Performance of late pregnancy biometry for gestational age dating in low-income and middle-income countries: a prospective, multicountry, population-based cohort study from the WHO Alliance for Maternal and Newborn Health Improvement (AMANHI) Study Group.中低收入国家妊娠晚期生物测量在孕龄估计中的表现:来自世卫组织孕产妇和新生儿健康改善联盟(AMANHI)研究组的一项前瞻性、多国、基于人群的队列研究。
Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Apr;8(4):e545-e554. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30034-6.
5
Newborn Skin Maturity Medical Device Validation for Gestational Age Prediction: Clinical Trial.新生儿皮肤成熟度医疗器械用于预测胎龄的验证:临床试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Sep 7;24(9):e38727. doi: 10.2196/38727.
6
Validity of Newborn Clinical Assessment to Determine Gestational Age in Bangladesh.孟加拉国新生儿临床评估确定胎龄的有效性
Pediatrics. 2016 Jul;138(1). doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-3303. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
7
Machine learning guided postnatal gestational age assessment using new-born screening metabolomic data in South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa.机器学习指导南亚和撒哈拉以南非洲地区新生儿筛查代谢组学数据的产后胎龄评估。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Sep 7;21(1):609. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04067-y.
8
A Comparison of the Accuracy of Various Methods of Postnatal Gestational Age Estimation; Including Ballard Score, Foot Length, Vascularity of the Anterior Lens, Last Menstrual Period and Also a Clinician's Non-Structured Assessment.各种产后胎龄估计方法的准确性比较;包括 Ballard 评分、足长、前晶状体血管化、末次月经,以及临床医生的非结构化评估。
J Trop Pediatr. 2021 Jan 29;67(1). doi: 10.1093/tropej/fmaa113.
9
Can the date of last menstrual period be trusted in the first trimester? Comparisons of gestational age measures from a prospective cohort study in six low-income to middle-income countries.末次月经日期在孕早期可信吗?六个中低收入国家前瞻性队列研究中妊娠龄测量值的比较。
BMJ Open. 2023 Sep 20;13(9):e067470. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067470.
10
Comparison of first trimester dating methods for gestational age estimation and their implication on preterm birth classification in a North Indian cohort.印度北部队列中孕早期孕周估计方法的比较及其对早产分类的影响
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Apr 30;21(1):343. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03807-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Measuring ENAP interventions for small and/or sick newborns in routine health information systems: indicators and considerations from a WHO expert consultation.在常规卫生信息系统中衡量针对小婴儿和/或患病新生儿的早期新生儿保健干预措施:来自世界卫生组织专家咨询会议的指标与考量
J Glob Health. 2025 May 9;15:04134. doi: 10.7189/jogh.15.04134.
2
Identification of factors associated with acute malnutrition in children under 5 years and forecasting future prevalence: assessing the potential of statistical and machine learning methods.识别5岁以下儿童急性营养不良的相关因素并预测未来患病率:评估统计方法和机器学习方法的潜力
BMJ Public Health. 2025 Mar 4;3(1):e001460. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2024-001460. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Postnatal gestational age estimation of newborns using Small Sample Deep Learning.使用小样本深度学习估计新生儿的出生后胎龄
Image Vis Comput. 2019 Mar-Apr;83-84:87-99. doi: 10.1016/j.imavis.2018.09.003.
2
National, regional, and worldwide estimates of low birthweight in 2015, with trends from 2000: a systematic analysis.2015 年全球、区域和国家低出生体重估计值及其 2000 年以来的变化趋势:系统分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Jul;7(7):e849-e860. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30565-5. Epub 2019 May 15.
3
Improving preterm newborn identification in low-resource settings with machine learning.
Implications of Big Data Analytics, AI, Machine Learning, and Deep Learning in the Health Care System of Bangladesh: Scoping Review.
大数据分析、人工智能、机器学习和深度学习在孟加拉国医疗保健系统中的应用:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Oct 28;26:e54710. doi: 10.2196/54710.
4
Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of postnatal clinical scoring methods and foot length measurement for estimating gestational age and birthweight of newborns in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.评估产后临床评分方法和足底长测量法在估计中低收入国家新生儿胎龄和出生体重的诊断准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2024 Aug 30;8(1):e002717. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2024-002717.
5
Young Infant Mortality Associated with Preterm and Small-for-Gestational-Age Births in Rural Bangladesh: A Prospective Cohort Study.孟加拉国农村地区与早产儿和小于胎龄儿出生相关的婴儿早期死亡率:一项前瞻性队列研究。
J Pediatr. 2024 Jun;269:114001. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2024.114001. Epub 2024 Mar 2.
6
Acceptability and Feasibility of a Low-Cost Device for Gestational Age Assessment in a Low-Resource Setting: Qualitative Study.低资源环境下用于评估孕周的低成本设备的可接受性和可行性:定性研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Dec 27;9(4):e34823. doi: 10.2196/34823.
7
Effective Approaches to Fetal Brain Segmentation in MRI and Gestational Age Estimation by Utilizing a Multiview Deep Inception Residual Network and Radiomics.利用多视图深度 inception 残差网络和放射组学进行胎儿脑磁共振成像分割及孕周估计的有效方法
Entropy (Basel). 2022 Nov 23;24(12):1708. doi: 10.3390/e24121708.
8
How Can Nutrition Research Better Reflect the Relationship Between Wasting and Stunting in Children? Learnings from the Wasting and Stunting Project.营养研究如何更好地反映儿童消瘦与发育迟缓之间的关系?从消瘦与发育迟缓项目中得到的经验。
J Nutr. 2023 Jan 14;152(12):2645-2651. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxac091.
9
Population-based rates, risk factors and consequences of preterm births in South-Asia and sub-Saharan Africa: A multi-country prospective cohort study.基于人群的南亚和撒哈拉以南非洲地区早产儿发生率、风险因素和后果的多国家前瞻性队列研究。
J Glob Health. 2022 Feb 19;12:04011. doi: 10.7189/jogh.12.04011. eCollection 2022.
利用机器学习提高资源匮乏环境中早产儿的识别率。
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 27;14(2):e0198919. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198919. eCollection 2019.
4
Global, regional, and national estimates of levels of preterm birth in 2014: a systematic review and modelling analysis.2014 年全球、区域和国家早产儿发生率的估计值:系统评价和建模分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Jan;7(1):e37-e46. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30451-0. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
5
Development and validation of a simplified algorithm for neonatal gestational age assessment - protocol for the Alliance for Maternal Newborn Health Improvement (AMANHI) prospective cohort study.新生儿胎龄评估简化算法的开发与验证——孕产妇新生儿健康改善联盟(AMANHI)前瞻性队列研究方案
J Glob Health. 2017 Dec;7(2):021201. doi: 10.7189/jogh.07.021201.
6
Diagnostic Accuracy of Neonatal Assessment for Gestational Age Determination: A Systematic Review.新生儿评估用于确定胎龄的诊断准确性:一项系统评价。
Pediatrics. 2017 Dec;140(6). doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-1423. Epub 2017 Nov 17.
7
Global, regional, and national causes of under-5 mortality in 2000-15: an updated systematic analysis with implications for the Sustainable Development Goals.2000 - 2015年全球、区域和国家五岁以下儿童死亡原因:一项最新的系统分析及其对可持续发展目标的启示
Lancet. 2016 Dec 17;388(10063):3027-3035. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31593-8. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
8
International standards for symphysis-fundal height based on serial measurements from the Fetal Growth Longitudinal Study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project: prospective cohort study in eight countries.基于INTERGROWTH-21st项目胎儿生长纵向研究系列测量结果的耻骨联合上缘至宫底高度国际标准:八个国家的前瞻性队列研究
BMJ. 2016 Nov 7;355:i5662. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i5662.
9
A home calendar and recall method of last menstrual period for estimating gestational age in rural Bangladesh: a validation study.孟加拉国农村地区用于估算孕周的家庭日历及末次月经回忆方法:一项验证研究
J Health Popul Nutr. 2016 Oct 21;35(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s41043-016-0072-y.
10
Measuring Gestational Age in Vital Statistics Data: Transitioning to the Obstetric Estimate.生命统计数据中孕周的测量:向产科估计值的转变。
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2015 Jun 1;64(5):1-20.