Suppr超能文献

向 5 至 8 岁儿童教授基本生命支持:一项整群随机试验。

Teaching Basic Life Support to 5- to 8-Year-Old Children: A Cluster Randomized Trial.

机构信息

REMOSS Research Group, Faculty of Education and Sport Sciences, University of Vigo, Vigo, Spain.

CLINURSID Research Group, Psychiatry, Radiology, Public Health, Nursing and Medicine Department

出版信息

Pediatrics. 2021 Oct;148(4). doi: 10.1542/peds.2021-051408. Epub 2021 Sep 13.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to compare traditional basic life support (BLS) education with specific and innovative educative didactic material that has been previously designed and validated.

METHODS

Fifteen classes of schoolchildren aged 5 to 8 years ( = 237) were randomly assigned to 4 groups in which different didactic and complementary materials were used: (1) the tool with a cuddly toy ( = 61), (2) the tool with a cuddly toy ( = 74), (3) traditional teaching with a cuddly toy ( = 46), and (4) traditional teaching with a manikin ( = 55). The BLS sequence was assessed at baseline (T0). After that, children took part in a one-hour theory and practice session in their assigned training modality. BLS sequence was assessed again within one week (T1) and after one month (T2).

RESULTS

The 4 modalities were successful in improving children's skills when comparing T0 with both T1 and T2 ( < .05). At T2, more schoolchildren remembered the complete BLS sequence after using the Rescube (75%) compared with the number of schoolchildren who remember the complete BLS sequence after using the Endless Book (53%), a manikin (42%), or a cuddly toy (13%) ( < .05). A higher proportion of participants who used the Rescube correctly performed all the BLS steps analyzed compared with those who used only the manikin or a cuddly toy during the learning phase. The Endless Book was also more effective except for learning to check consciousness and breathing.

CONCLUSION

Better BLS learning and knowledge retention outcomes were achieved by using our specific and adapted didactic materials (Rescube and Endless Book). These new educational tools have the potential to substantially support BLS school education programs.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较传统基础生命支持(BLS)教育与经过预先设计和验证的特定创新教学材料。

方法

将 5 至 8 岁的 15 个班的学童(n = 237)随机分为 4 组,分别使用不同的教学和补充材料:(1)使用毛绒玩具的 Rescube(n = 61),(2)使用毛绒玩具的 Endless Book(n = 74),(3)使用毛绒玩具的传统教学(n = 46)和(4)使用人体模型的传统教学(n = 55)。在基线(T0)时评估 BLS 序列。之后,儿童根据其分配的培训模式参加了一个小时的理论和实践课程。在一周内(T1)和一个月后(T2)再次评估 BLS 序列。

结果

4 种模式在将 T0 与 T1 和 T2 进行比较时都成功地提高了儿童的技能(<0.05)。在 T2 时,与使用无尽书(53%)、人体模型(42%)或毛绒玩具(13%)相比,使用 Rescube 的学童记住完整 BLS 序列的比例更高(<0.05)。与仅在学习阶段使用人体模型或毛绒玩具的参与者相比,使用 Rescube 的参与者正确执行所有 BLS 步骤的比例更高。无尽书的效果也更好,除了学习检查意识和呼吸。

结论

使用我们特定的适应教学材料(Rescube 和 Endless Book)可获得更好的 BLS 学习和知识保留效果。这些新的教育工具有可能为 BLS 学校教育计划提供实质性支持。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验