• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于向学童传授成人基本生命支持理论要素的五指记忆法:一项经改进的、由德尔菲法引导的开发及针对学童的记忆性试点测试。

A five-finger mnemonic for teaching schoolchildren the theoretical components of adult basic life support: a modified reactive Delphi-guided development and memorability pilot test with schoolchildren.

作者信息

Fijačko Nino, Greif Robert, Metličar Špela, Štiglic Gregor, Abella Benjamin S, Strnad Matej

机构信息

Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia.

Emergency Department, Maribor University Medical Centre, Maribor, Slovenia.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2024 Dec 30;24(1):1554. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06519-3.

DOI:10.1186/s12909-024-06519-3
PMID:39736674
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11684042/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A mnemonic is a cognitive aid frequently used in health-related education. The main goal of this study was to develop and test a 5-finger mnemonic for teaching schoolchildren the theoretical aspects of adult Basic Life Support (BLS) steps, a process rarely described in the context of instructing laypersons.

METHODS

Experts from the European Resuscitation Council's Basic Life Support Science and Education Committee (ERC BLS SEC), specializing in teaching adult BLS, participated in the first phase of the pilot study. This phase employed the modified reactive Delphi to develop a 5-finger mnemonic for teaching schoolchildren the theoretical aspects of adult BLS steps, in accordance with the 2021 ERC BLS guidelines. The mnemonic underwent revision rounds based on expert suggestions and was evaluated using a 9-point Likert scale. The process was repeated until there was unanimous approval. In the second phase, a pilot test was conducted with schoolchildren at a summer camp to assess their recall of the 5-finger mnemonic. Following their training in adult BLS steps utilizing the 5-finger mnemonic, schoolchildren were tasked with arranging cards depicting images from the mnemonic both before and after the training.

RESULTS

From March to October 2022, a four-round modified reactive Delphi engaged four experts from the ERC BLS SEC. Initial expert consensus was moderate, 6.0 (IQR = 4.5-7.5, min = 1, max = 9), on a scale 1 ("totally disagree") to 9 ("totally agree"). The experts consensus improved over subsequent rounds, resulting in two final versions of the 5-finger mnemonic. Both versions concentrate on the comprehensive adult BLS, differing only in their approach to cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR): one employs a method of 30 chest compressions followed by two rescue breaths, while the other utilizes compression-only CPR. In August 2023, a recall pilot test involved mostly female schoolchildren (12/13, 92.3%). Pre-training, no cards with 5-finger mnemonic content were arranged correctly, but post-training, progress improvement was observed, especially in older schoolchildren (Z = -2.727, p = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

The pilot study highlights the potential of using tailored educational tools, such as mnemonics, to teach important lifesaving skills to different age groups. This suggests that the 5-finger mnemonic effectively improved schoolchildren's understanding of the theoretical aspects of adult BLS steps.

摘要

背景

记忆法是一种常用于健康相关教育的认知辅助工具。本研究的主要目的是开发并测试一种五指记忆法,用于向学童传授成人基础生命支持(BLS)步骤的理论知识,这一过程在对非专业人员进行指导的背景下鲜有描述。

方法

欧洲复苏委员会基础生命支持科学与教育委员会(ERC BLS SEC)中专门从事成人BLS教学的专家参与了试点研究的第一阶段。此阶段采用改良的反应性德尔菲法,根据2021年ERC BLS指南,开发一种五指记忆法,用于向学童传授成人BLS步骤的理论知识。该记忆法根据专家建议进行了多轮修订,并使用9点李克特量表进行评估。这一过程反复进行,直至获得一致认可。在第二阶段,在一个夏令营对学童进行了试点测试,以评估他们对五指记忆法的记忆情况。在使用五指记忆法对学童进行成人BLS步骤培训后,要求他们在培训前后对描绘记忆法图像的卡片进行排列。

结果

2022年3月至10月,来自ERC BLS SEC的四位专家参与了四轮改良的反应性德尔菲法。专家的初始共识为中等程度,评分为6.0(四分位间距=4.5 - 7.5,最小值=1,最大值=9),评分范围为1(“完全不同意”)至9(“完全同意”)。在随后的几轮中,专家共识有所提高,最终形成了两个版本的五指记忆法。两个版本都聚焦于全面的成人BLS,仅在心肺复苏(CPR)方法上有所不同:一个采用30次胸外按压后进行两次人工呼吸的方法,另一个采用仅胸外按压的CPR。2023年8月,一项记忆试点测试主要涉及女学童(12/13,92.3%)。培训前,没有正确排列出包含五指记忆法内容的卡片,但培训后,观察到了进步,尤其是在年龄较大的学童中(Z = -2.727,p = 0.006)。

结论

试点研究凸显了使用如记忆法等量身定制的教育工具向不同年龄组传授重要救生技能的潜力。这表明五指记忆法有效地提高了学童对成人BLS步骤理论知识的理解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9969/11684042/37168c1eddc9/12909_2024_6519_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9969/11684042/266efe4d4132/12909_2024_6519_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9969/11684042/fd95eae71c37/12909_2024_6519_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9969/11684042/37168c1eddc9/12909_2024_6519_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9969/11684042/266efe4d4132/12909_2024_6519_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9969/11684042/fd95eae71c37/12909_2024_6519_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9969/11684042/37168c1eddc9/12909_2024_6519_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A five-finger mnemonic for teaching schoolchildren the theoretical components of adult basic life support: a modified reactive Delphi-guided development and memorability pilot test with schoolchildren.一种用于向学童传授成人基本生命支持理论要素的五指记忆法:一项经改进的、由德尔菲法引导的开发及针对学童的记忆性试点测试。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Dec 30;24(1):1554. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06519-3.
2
Evaluating Quality, Usability, Evidence-Based Content, and Gamification Features in Mobile Learning Apps Designed to Teach Children Basic Life Support: Systematic Search in App Stores and Content Analysis.评估旨在教授儿童基本生命支持的移动学习应用程序的质量、可用性、基于证据的内容和游戏化功能:应用商店中的系统搜索和内容分析。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Jul 20;9(7):e25437. doi: 10.2196/25437.
3
Teaching cards as low-cost and brief materials for teaching basic life support to 6-10-year-old primary school children - a quasi-experimental combination design study.教学卡片作为一种低成本、简短的材料,用于向 6-10 岁小学生教授基本生命支持技能 - 一项准实验组合设计研究。
BMC Pediatr. 2022 Nov 8;22(1):648. doi: 10.1186/s12887-022-03730-3.
4
Influence of learning styles on the practical performance after the four-step basic life support training approach - An observational cohort study.学习风格对四步基础生命支持培训方法后实践表现的影响——一项观察性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2017 May 22;12(5):e0178210. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178210. eCollection 2017.
5
KIDS SAVE LIVES in schools: cross-sectional survey of schoolteachers.儿童在学校拯救生命:对学校教师的横断面调查。
Eur J Pediatr. 2021 Jul;180(7):2213-2221. doi: 10.1007/s00431-021-03971-x. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
6
The effect of basic life support education on laypersons' willingness in performing bystander hands only cardiopulmonary resuscitation.基础生命支持教育对非专业人员行单纯徒手心肺复苏意愿的影响。
Resuscitation. 2010 Jun;81(6):691-4. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.02.021. Epub 2010 Mar 26.
7
Effectiveness of basic life support instruction in physical education students--a pilot study.基础生命支持教学对体育专业学生的有效性——一项试点研究。
Teach Learn Med. 2014;26(3):252-7. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2014.910459.
8
Single-rescuer cardiopulmonary resuscitation: 'two quick breaths'--an oxymoron.单人实施心肺复苏:“两次快速呼吸”——自相矛盾的说法。
Resuscitation. 2004 Sep;62(3):283-9. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2004.05.013.
9
Teaching basic life support with an automated external defibrillator using the two-stage or the four-stage teaching technique.采用两阶段或四阶段教学技术,使用自动体外除颤器进行基本生命支持教学。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2018 Feb;25(1):18-24. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000410.
10
[A first step to teaching basic life support in schools: Training the teachers].[学校开展基本生命支持教学的第一步:培训教师]
An Pediatr (Engl Ed). 2018 Nov;89(5):265-271. doi: 10.1016/j.anpedi.2017.11.002. Epub 2017 Dec 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the Impact of Home-Based Serious Smartphone Resuscitation Gaming on Stress Among Nursing Students Practicing Simulated Adult Basic Life Support: Randomized Waitlist Controlled Trial.探索家庭式重症智能手机复苏游戏对练习模拟成人基本生命支持的护生压力的影响:随机候补名单对照试验
JMIR Serious Games. 2025 Aug 29;13:e67623. doi: 10.2196/67623.
2
Getting ON-TRAC, a team-centred design study of a reflexivity aid to support resuscitation teams' information sharing.开展ON-TRAC,这是一项以团队为中心的设计研究,旨在研究一种反思辅助工具,以支持复苏团队的信息共享。
Adv Simul (Lond). 2025 Mar 28;10(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s41077-025-00340-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Teaching schoolchildren recalling the emergency number with easy cognitive aids - A pilot study.通过简单的认知辅助工具帮助学童记住急救号码——一项试点研究。
Resuscitation. 2024 Oct;203:110369. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2024.110369. Epub 2024 Aug 22.
2
Cognitive aids used in simulated resuscitation: A systematic review.模拟复苏中使用的认知辅助工具:一项系统综述。
Resusc Plus. 2024 Jun 1;19:100675. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100675. eCollection 2024 Sep.
3
Effects of a Serious Smartphone Game on Nursing Students' Theoretical Knowledge and Practical Skills in Adult Basic Life Support: Randomized Wait List-Controlled Trial.
一款重度智能手机游戏对护理专业学生成人基础生命支持理论知识和实践技能的影响:随机等待列表对照试验
JMIR Serious Games. 2024 Apr 5;12:e56037. doi: 10.2196/56037.
4
Comparison of gamification and role-playing education on nursing students' cardiopulmonary resuscitation self-efficacy.比较游戏化和角色扮演教育对护理学生心肺复苏自我效能的影响。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Mar 4;24(1):231. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05230-7.
5
Education of schoolchildren in cardiopulmonary resuscitation - overview of the current literature.学童心肺复苏教育——当前文献综述
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2023 Dec 1;29(6):616-620. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000001111. Epub 2023 Oct 9.
6
ChatGPT versus human memory: A historical exploration of the 4 Hs and 4 Ts.ChatGPT与人类记忆:对4个H和4个T的历史探索。
Resuscitation. 2023 Nov;192:109982. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2023.109982. Epub 2023 Sep 29.
7
Methods to teach schoolchildren how to perform and retain cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) skills: A systematic review and meta-analysis.教小学生如何实施和保持心肺复苏术(CPR)技能的方法:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
Resusc Plus. 2023 Aug 10;15:100439. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2023.100439. eCollection 2023 Sep.
8
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in low-resource settings: a statement by the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation, supported by the AFEM, EUSEM, IFEM, and IFRC.低资源环境下心肺复苏:复苏国际联络委员会的声明,得到了 AFEM、EUSEM、IFEM 和 IFRC 的支持。
Lancet Glob Health. 2023 Sep;11(9):e1444-e1453. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(23)00302-9.
9
Why the Norwegian 2021 guideline for basic life support are different.为何挪威2021年基本生命支持指南有所不同。
Resusc Plus. 2023 May 8;14:100392. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2023.100392. eCollection 2023 Jun.
10
KIDS SAVE LIVES: Basic Life Support Education for Schoolchildren: A Narrative Review and Scientific Statement From the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation.儿童拯救生命:面向学龄儿童的基本生命支持教育:复苏国际联络委员会的叙述性综述和科学声明。
Circulation. 2023 Jun 13;147(24):1854-1868. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001128. Epub 2023 May 17.