Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Institute of Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Emerg Med J. 2019 Apr;36(4):239-244. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2018-207923. Epub 2019 Feb 16.
To increase the rate of bystander resuscitation, basic life support (BLS) training for schoolchildren is now recommended on a broad level. However, debate continues about the optimal teaching methods. In this study, we investigated the effects of a 90 min BLS training on female pupils' BLS knowledge and self-confidence and whether learning outcomes were influenced by the instructors' professional backgrounds or test-enhanced learning.
We conducted a cluster randomised, longitudinal trial in a girls' grammar school in Germany from 2013 to 2014. Pupils aged 10-17 years were randomised to receive BLS training conducted by either emergency physicians or medical students. Using a multiple-choice questionnaire and a Likert-type scale, BLS knowledge and self-confidence were investigated before training (t), 1 week (t) and 9 months after training (t). To investigate whether test-enhanced learning influenced learning outcomes, the questionnaire was administered 6 months after the training in half of the classrooms. The data were analysed using linear mixed-effects models.
The study included 460 schoolchildren. BLS knowledge (mean number of correct answers) increased from 5.86 at t to 9.24 at t (p<0.001) and self-confidence (mean score on the Likert-type scale) increased from 8.70 at t to 11.29 at t (p<0.001). After 9 months, knowledge retention was good (8.94 at t; p=0.080 vs t), but self-confidence significantly declined from t to 9.73 at t (p<0.001). Pupils trained by medical students showed a slight but statistically significant greater increase in the knowledge at both t and t, whereas instructors' background did not influence gain or retention of self-confidence. Retesting resulted in a marginally, non-significantly better retention of knowledge.
BLS training led to short-term gains in knowledge and self-confidence. Although knowledge was retained at 9 months after the training session, self-confidence significantly decreased. Interim testing did not appear to impact retention of knowledge or self-confidence. Medical students should be considered as instructors for these courses given their favourable learning outcomes and greater availability.
为提高旁观者复苏率,目前广泛推荐对学童进行基本生命支持(BLS)培训。然而,关于最佳教学方法的争论仍在继续。在这项研究中,我们调查了 90 分钟 BLS 培训对女学生 BLS 知识和自信心的影响,以及学习效果是否受到教师专业背景或测试增强学习的影响。
我们在德国的一所女子文法学校进行了一项 2013 年至 2014 年的集群随机、纵向试验。10-17 岁的学生被随机分为接受由急诊医生或医学生进行的 BLS 培训。使用多项选择题问卷和李克特量表,在培训前(t)、1 周后(t)和 9 个月后(t)调查 BLS 知识和自信心。为了研究测试增强学习是否影响学习效果,在培训后的 6 个月,在一半的教室里进行了问卷调查。使用线性混合效应模型进行数据分析。
该研究共纳入 460 名学生。BLS 知识(答对的平均题数)从 t 时的 5.86 增加到 t 时的 9.24(p<0.001),自信心(李克特量表的平均得分)从 t 时的 8.70 增加到 t 时的 11.29(p<0.001)。9 个月后,知识保持良好(t 时为 8.94;p=0.080 与 t 时相比),但自信心从 t 时显著下降到 t 时的 9.73(p<0.001)。接受医学生培训的学生在 t 和 t 时的知识增长略有但具有统计学意义,而教师背景并未影响自信心的获得或保持。重新测试导致知识的保留略有但无统计学意义的改善。
BLS 培训在短期内提高了知识和自信心。尽管培训结束后 9 个月仍能保持知识,但自信心显著下降。中期测试似乎不会影响知识或自信心的保留。鉴于其有利的学习效果和更大的可用性,应考虑医学生作为这些课程的教师。