Farr Ian, Cowley Laura, Broadhurst Karen, Odd David, Jones Carys, Bailey Grace, Alrouh Bachar, Abouelenin Mariam, Cusworth Linda, Doebler Stephanie, Ford David, Griffiths Lucy
Population Data Science, Swansea University School of Medicine, Swansea.
Centre for Child & Family Justice Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster.
Int J Popul Data Sci. 2024 Apr 15;9(2):2362. doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v9i1.2362. eCollection 2024.
When a childhas suffered, or is at risk of suffering, significant harm from parents or caregivers, the local authority may issue Section 31 (s.31) Care andSupervision proceedings under the Children Act (1989).
We compared the healthcare use of infants less than one year old subject to s.31 proceedings in Wales ( = 1, 332), to that of a comparison group of infants not subject to s.31 proceedings ( = 204, 417), between January 2011 and February 2020.
Population-based e-cohort study utilising data held in the Secure Anonymised Information Linkage (SAIL) Databank. Infants in s.31 proceedings were identified using the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service dataset. This was linked to demographic and healthcare datasets, to identify General Practice (GP) visits, emergency department (ED) attendances, and hospital admissions (emergency and elective); before the study end date or the child's first birthday for the comparison group, orbefore the s.31 application date. Regression analysis calculated event rate ratios [RR] and incidence rate ratios [IRR] for healthcare events, adjusting for widerdeterminants of health (e.g. perinatal factors, maternal mental health, deprivation), and investigated reasons for healthcare use.
Infants in s.31 proceedings had ahigher number and incidence of healthcare events compared with the comparison group, across all healthcare settings. Differences were greatest for emergency hospital admissions (IRR = 4.03, 95, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.53-4.59; RR = 4.60, CI = 3.90-5.41). "Injury and poisoning" was the main reason for emergency admissions amongst infants in s.31 proceedings. For ED presentations, emergency hospital admissions, and GP visits, there were proportionally more events for these infants across all top ten reasons for healthcare.
Findings highlight greater healthcare utilisation for infants involved in s.31 proceedings in Wales, helping to build a better understanding of their needs and vulnerabilities.
当儿童遭受或有遭受来自父母或照料者的重大伤害的风险时,地方当局可根据《1989年儿童法》启动第31条(s.31)的照护与监督程序。
我们比较了2011年1月至2020年2月期间,威尔士接受s.31程序的1332名一岁以下婴儿与未接受s.31程序的204417名婴儿对照组的医疗保健使用情况。
基于人群的电子队列研究,利用安全匿名信息链接(SAIL)数据库中的数据。使用儿童和家庭法庭咨询与支持服务数据集识别接受s.31程序的婴儿。将其与人口统计学和医疗保健数据集相链接,以确定全科医生(GP)就诊、急诊科(ED)就诊和住院情况(急诊和择期);对于对照组,在研究结束日期或儿童一岁生日之前,对于接受s.31程序的婴儿,在s.31申请日期之前。回归分析计算医疗保健事件的事件发生率比[RR]和发病率比[IRR],并对更广泛的健康决定因素(如围产期因素、母亲心理健康、贫困)进行调整,并调查医疗保健使用的原因。
在所有医疗保健环境中,接受s.31程序的婴儿的医疗保健事件数量和发生率均高于对照组。急诊住院差异最大(IRR = 4.03,95%置信区间[CI] = 3.53 - 4.59;RR = 4.60,CI = 3.90 - 5.41)。“受伤和中毒”是接受s.31程序的婴儿急诊入院的主要原因。对于急诊科就诊、急诊住院和全科医生就诊,在所有十大医疗保健原因中,这些婴儿的事件比例更高。
研究结果凸显了威尔士参与s.31程序的婴儿对医疗保健的利用率更高,有助于更好地了解他们的需求和脆弱性。