Performance of axial diameter on MR imaging for identification of retropharyngeal lymph node metastases in head and neck cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE

To summarize previous studies' data and to calculate the diagnostic performance of minimum axial diameter (MIAD) and maximum axial diameter (MAAD) on each of the cutoff values in retropharyngeal lymph node (RPLNs) metastases in head and neck cancer.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Scopus, and Embase databases were searched for systematic review. Meta-analysis was performed to summarize estimates of sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and generate summary recipient operator characteristic (sROC).

RESULTS

The review identified 5 studies with a total of 634 patients (971 lesions) that were eligible for the meta-analysis. The estimated sensitivity, specificity, and DOR at MIAD 5 mm cutoff and MIAD 6 mm cutoff were 89.8% and 74.3%, 82.7% and 92.7%, and 39.1 and 57.9, respectively. The estimated sensitivity, specificity, and DOR at MAAD 7 mm cutoff and MAAD 8 mm cutoff were 90.3% and 84.7%, 62.7% and 79.9%, and 17.8 and 21.7, respectively. The AUCs of sROC at MIAD 5 mm cutoff and MIAD 6 mm cutoff were 0.922 and 0.943. At MAAD 7 mm and MAAD 8 mm, they were 0.840 and 0.888.

CONCLUSION

The diagnostic performance of the MIAD 6 mm cutoff in RPLN metastases from head and neck cancer was 2% higher than the MIAD 5 mm cutoff. The diagnostic performance of MIAD was higher than that of MAAD.