• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中风失语症中的两种语音阅读障碍类型。

Two types of phonological reading impairment in stroke aphasia.

作者信息

Dickens Jonathan Vivian, DeMarco Andrew T, van der Stelt Candace M, Snider Sarah F, Lacey Elizabeth H, Medaglia John D, Friedman Rhonda B, Turkeltaub Peter E

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20007, USA.

Center for Brain Plasticity and Recovery, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20007, USA.

出版信息

Brain Commun. 2021 Aug 30;3(3):fcab194. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcab194. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1093/braincomms/fcab194
PMID:34522884
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8432944/
Abstract

Alexia is common in the context of aphasia. It is widely agreed that damage to phonological and semantic systems not specific to reading causes co-morbid alexia and aphasia. Studies of alexia to date have only examined phonology and semantics as singular processes or axes of impairment, typically in the context of stereotyped alexia syndromes. However, phonology, in particular, is known to rely on subprocesses, including sensory-phonological processing, motor-phonological processing, and sensory-motor integration. Moreover, many people with stroke aphasia demonstrate mild or mixed patterns of reading impairment that do not fit neatly with one syndrome. This cross-sectional study tested whether the hallmark symptom of phonological reading impairment, the lexicality effect, emerges from damage to a specific subprocess of phonology in stroke patients not selected for alexia syndromes. Participants were 30 subjects with left-hemispheric stroke and 37 age- and education-matched controls. A logistic mixed-effects model tested whether post-stroke impairments in sensory phonology, motor phonology, or sensory-motor integration modulated the effect of item lexicality on patient accuracy in reading aloud. Support vector regression voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping localized brain regions necessary for reading and non-orthographic phonological processing. Additionally, a novel support vector regression structural connectome-symptom mapping method identified the contribution of both lesioned and spared but disconnected, brain regions to reading accuracy and non-orthographic phonological processing. Specifically, we derived whole-brain structural connectomes using constrained spherical deconvolution-based probabilistic tractography and identified lesioned connections based on comparisons between patients and controls. Logistic mixed-effects regression revealed that only greater motor-phonological impairment related to lower accuracy reading aloud pseudowords versus words. Impaired sensory-motor integration was related to lower overall accuracy in reading aloud. No relationship was identified between sensory-phonological impairment and reading accuracy. Voxel-based and structural connectome lesion-symptom mapping revealed that lesioned and disconnected left ventral precentral gyrus related to both greater motor-phonological impairment and lower sublexical reading accuracy. In contrast, lesioned and disconnected left temporoparietal cortex is related to both impaired sensory-motor integration and reduced overall reading accuracy. These results clarify that at least two dissociable phonological processes contribute to the pattern of reading impairment in aphasia. First, impaired sensory-motor integration, caused by lesions disrupting the left temporoparietal cortex and its structural connections, non-selectively reduces accuracy in reading aloud. Second, impaired motor-phonological processing, caused at least partially by lesions disrupting left ventral premotor cortex and structural connections, selectively reduces sublexical reading accuracy. These results motivate a revised cognitive model of reading aloud that incorporates a sensory-motor phonological circuit.

摘要

失读症在失语症背景下很常见。人们普遍认为,对非特定于阅读的语音和语义系统的损害会导致共病性失读症和失语症。迄今为止,关于失读症的研究仅将语音和语义作为单一过程或损伤轴进行考察,通常是在刻板的失读症综合征背景下。然而,众所周知,语音尤其依赖于子过程,包括感觉语音处理、运动语音处理和感觉运动整合。此外,许多中风失语症患者表现出轻度或混合性阅读障碍模式,并不完全符合某一种综合征。这项横断面研究测试了语音阅读障碍的标志性症状——词汇性效应,是否源于未被选入失读症综合征的中风患者语音特定子过程的损伤。参与者为30名左半球中风患者和37名年龄及教育程度匹配的对照组。一个逻辑混合效应模型测试了中风后感觉语音、运动语音或感觉运动整合方面的损伤是否调节了项目词汇性对患者大声朗读准确性的影响。基于支持向量回归的体素损伤-症状映射定位了阅读和非正字法语音处理所需的脑区。此外,一种新的支持向量回归结构连接组-症状映射方法确定了受损和未受损但断开连接的脑区对阅读准确性和非正字法语音处理的贡献。具体而言,我们使用基于约束球面反卷积的概率纤维束成像得出全脑结构连接组,并根据患者与对照组的比较确定受损连接。逻辑混合效应回归显示,只有更大的运动语音损伤与朗读假词与真词相比准确性较低相关。感觉运动整合受损与大声朗读的总体准确性较低相关。未发现感觉语音损伤与阅读准确性之间的关系。基于体素和结构连接组的损伤-症状映射显示,受损和断开连接的左侧腹侧中央前回与更大的运动语音损伤和更低的次词汇阅读准确性均相关。相比之下,受损和断开连接的左侧颞顶叶皮层与感觉运动整合受损和总体阅读准确性降低均相关。这些结果表明,至少有两个可分离的语音过程导致了失语症患者的阅读障碍模式。首先,由破坏左侧颞顶叶皮层及其结构连接的损伤引起的感觉运动整合受损,非选择性地降低了大声朗读的准确性。其次,至少部分由破坏左侧腹侧运动前皮层及其结构连接的损伤引起的运动语音处理受损,选择性地降低了次词汇阅读准确性。这些结果促使人们对大声朗读的认知模型进行修订,纳入感觉运动语音回路。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3a6/8432944/81e49dc95600/fcab194f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3a6/8432944/dbd773eeb9ed/fcab194f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3a6/8432944/eaacf98e28fa/fcab194f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3a6/8432944/9d4baec00c5f/fcab194f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3a6/8432944/e03aefc1d9d3/fcab194f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3a6/8432944/81e49dc95600/fcab194f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3a6/8432944/dbd773eeb9ed/fcab194f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3a6/8432944/eaacf98e28fa/fcab194f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3a6/8432944/9d4baec00c5f/fcab194f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3a6/8432944/e03aefc1d9d3/fcab194f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3a6/8432944/81e49dc95600/fcab194f4.jpg

相似文献

1
Two types of phonological reading impairment in stroke aphasia.中风失语症中的两种语音阅读障碍类型。
Brain Commun. 2021 Aug 30;3(3):fcab194. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcab194. eCollection 2021.
2
Localization of Phonological and Semantic Contributions to Reading.语音和语义对阅读的贡献的定位。
J Neurosci. 2019 Jul 3;39(27):5361-5368. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2707-18.2019. Epub 2019 May 6.
3
Taking the sublexical route: brain dynamics of reading in the semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia.走亚词汇通路:原发性进行性失语症语义变异型的阅读大脑动态。
Brain. 2020 Aug 1;143(8):2545-2560. doi: 10.1093/brain/awaa212.
4
Appraising Linguistic and Reading Impairments in Kannada-Speaking Persons With Central Alexia.评估患有中枢性失读症的卡纳达语使用者的语言和阅读障碍。
Cureus. 2024 Jun 29;16(6):e63437. doi: 10.7759/cureus.63437. eCollection 2024 Jun.
5
Post-stroke language disorders.中风后语言障碍
Acta Clin Croat. 2011 Mar;50(1):79-94.
6
Resting-State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Connectivity Between Semantic and Phonological Regions of Interest May Inform Language Targets in Aphasia.静息态功能磁共振成像中语义和语音感兴趣区域之间的连接性可能为失语症的语言目标提供信息。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 Sep 15;63(9):3051-3067. doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-19-00117. Epub 2020 Aug 5.
7
Targeting Phonology or Semantics to Improve Reading Aloud Response Times and Accuracy: A Case Series Investigation of Stroke Survivors With Aphasia.针对语音或语义以改善朗读反应时间和准确性:一项针对失语症中风幸存者的病例系列调查
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2024 Dec 12;33(6S):3263-3295. doi: 10.1044/2024_AJSLP-23-00364. Epub 2024 Aug 15.
8
Multivariate Connectome-Based Symptom Mapping in Post-Stroke Patients: Networks Supporting Language and Speech.基于多变量连接组的中风后患者症状映射:支持语言和言语的网络
J Neurosci. 2016 Jun 22;36(25):6668-79. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4396-15.2016.
9
Disentangling phonological and articulatory processing: A neuroanatomical study in aphasia.解析语音和发音加工:失语症的神经解剖学研究。
Neuropsychologia. 2018 Dec;121:175-185. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.10.015. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
10
Common predictors of spoken and written language performance in aphasia, alexia, and agraphia.失语症、失读症和失写症中口语和书面语言表现的常见预测因素。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Nov 7;16:1025468. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.1025468. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
An approach to measuring language-specific brain function in developmental language disorder.一种测量发育性语言障碍中特定语言脑功能的方法。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2025 Aug;258:105226. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105226. Epub 2025 Jul 8.
2
Cortical and behavioral correlates of alexia in primary progressive aphasia and Alzheimer's disease.原发性进行性失语症和阿尔茨海默病中失读症的皮质及行为相关性
Neuropsychologia. 2025 Jan 29;207:109066. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2025.109066. Epub 2025 Jan 3.
3
Four dimensions of naturalistic language production in aphasia after stroke.

本文引用的文献

1
Modelling speech motor programming and apraxia of speech in the DIVA/GODIVA neurocomputational framework.在DIVA/GODIVA神经计算框架中对言语运动编程和言语失用症进行建模。
Aphasiology. 2021;35(4):424-441. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2020.1765307. Epub 2020 May 18.
2
Phonological and surface dyslexia in individuals with brain tumors: Performance pre-, intra-, immediately post-surgery and at follow-up.脑肿瘤患者的语音和表层阅读障碍:手术前、手术中、手术后即刻和随访时的表现。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2020 Dec;41(17):5015-5031. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25176. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
3
Taking the sublexical route: brain dynamics of reading in the semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia.
中风后失语症中自然语言产生的四个维度。
Brain. 2025 Jan 7;148(1):291-312. doi: 10.1093/brain/awae195.
4
Rapid auditory and phonemic processing relies on the left planum temporale.快速听觉和音素处理依赖于左侧颞平面。
Res Sq. 2024 Apr 1:rs.3.rs-4189759. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4189759/v1.
5
Dissociating reading and auditory comprehension in persons with aphasia.区分失语症患者的阅读和听觉理解能力。
Brain Commun. 2024 Mar 25;6(2):fcae102. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcae102. eCollection 2024.
6
Apraxia of speech with phonological alexia and agraphia following resection of the left middle precentral gyrus: illustrative case.左中央前回中部切除术后伴语音失用、语音性失读和失写:病例报告
J Neurosurg Case Lessons. 2023 Mar 27;5(13). doi: 10.3171/CASE22504.
7
The organization of individually mapped structural and functional semantic networks in aging adults.个体绘制的结构和功能语义网络在老年人中的组织方式。
Brain Struct Funct. 2022 Sep;227(7):2513-2527. doi: 10.1007/s00429-022-02544-4. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
走亚词汇通路:原发性进行性失语症语义变异型的阅读大脑动态。
Brain. 2020 Aug 1;143(8):2545-2560. doi: 10.1093/brain/awaa212.
4
Motor representations underlie the reading of unfamiliar letter combinations.运动表象是阅读不熟悉的字母组合的基础。
Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 2;10(1):3828. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-59199-6.
5
MRtrix3: A fast, flexible and open software framework for medical image processing and visualisation.MRtrix3:一个用于医学图像处理和可视化的快速、灵活、开放的软件框架。
Neuroimage. 2019 Nov 15;202:116137. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116137. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
6
Localization of Phonological and Semantic Contributions to Reading.语音和语义对阅读的贡献的定位。
J Neurosci. 2019 Jul 3;39(27):5361-5368. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2707-18.2019. Epub 2019 May 6.
7
Self-reported inner speech relates to phonological retrieval ability in people with aphasia.自述内言语与失语症患者的语音检索能力有关。
Conscious Cogn. 2019 May;71:18-29. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2019.03.005. Epub 2019 Mar 25.
8
Mapping the intersection of language and reading: the neural bases of the primary systems hypothesis.映射语言和阅读的交集:主要系统假说的神经基础。
Brain Struct Funct. 2018 Nov;223(8):3769-3786. doi: 10.1007/s00429-018-1716-z. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
9
Dorsal and ventral visual stream contributions to preserved reading ability in patients with central alexia.背侧和腹侧视觉流对中央性失读症患者保留阅读能力的贡献。
Cortex. 2018 Sep;106:200-212. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.06.003. Epub 2018 Jun 23.
10
Prosodic and phonetic subtypes of primary progressive apraxia of speech.原发性进行性言语失用症的韵律和语音亚型
Brain Lang. 2018 Sep;184:54-65. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2018.06.004. Epub 2018 Jul 4.