• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估患有中枢性失读症的卡纳达语使用者的语言和阅读障碍。

Appraising Linguistic and Reading Impairments in Kannada-Speaking Persons With Central Alexia.

作者信息

Swamy Akshaya, Goswami Sathyapal Puri

机构信息

Department of Speech and Hearing, Father Muller College, Mangalore, IND.

Deaprtment of Speech Language Pathology, All India Institute of Speech and Hearing, Mysuru, IND.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Jun 29;16(6):e63437. doi: 10.7759/cureus.63437. eCollection 2024 Jun.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.63437
PMID:39077278
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11284617/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Alexia is an acquired condition resulting in impaired abilities to comprehend and/or read aloud written scripts secondary to lesions in the brain involved in reading processes. Just as how linguistic aspects are multi-faceted in persons with aphasia (PWAs), the reading impairments also vary extensively across each PWA depending on the type and nature of the language deficits. Each language has its unique linguistic properties. Whether the impairment is in the spoken form or written form, the dissociations in both aspects across the linguistic distinctions are paramount. Given the diverse orthographic features of Kannada, alongside inquiries into the impairment in oral language skills among individuals with acquired reading difficulties, the study emphasizes distinguishing the concurrent language processes associated with reading impairment.

AIM

The study aimed to explore the relationship between spoken language and reading abilities in Kannada-speaking post-stroke survivors with acquired alexia.

METHOD

The study recruited 15 Kannada-speaking adults with complaints of reading impairment post-ictus through convenient sampling. The enrolled participants included both males and females with a mean age of 42.2 years (SD=15.58; range=20-68) with 16 years of formal education. The study performed three primary investigations; a) linguistic, b) oral reading, and c) reading comprehension. Linguistic tasks entailed semantics, syntax, and phonological tasks. Oral reading entailed real word and non-word reading tasks. Reading comprehension tasks entailed single-word level, sentence-level, and paragraph-level tasks.

RESULTS

Results of overall domain performance across linguistics, oral reading, and reading comprehension revealed superior performance in linguistics (M=71.77, SD=19.18) followed by reading comprehension (M=70.55, SD=24.10) and oral reading (M=41.55, SD=24.66), which was significant (p<0.05). Performance in phonology was weakest (M=58.06, SD=12.44) compared to syntax (M=71.13) and semantics (M=85.33) on comparing PWAs' abilities within the linguistic domain. Reading abilities were compared across oral reading and reading comprehension, which significantly varied (p<0.05), and reading comprehension abilities were superior (M=72.65, SD=24.10). Task-specific variabilities were significant (p<0.05) in both oral reading and reading comprehension, wherein, real word reading (M=58.22) and comprehension at a single level (M=80.22) were better performed. Results of correlation analysis revealed semantics (r=0.494, p<0.05) and phonology (r=0.428, p>0.05) were highly positively correlated to oral reading abilities. Syntax (r=0.412, p>0.05), and semantics (r=0.377, p>0.05) were strongly positively correlated to reading comprehension abilities.

CONCLUSION

The study has convincingly shown that performance on reading-related tasks reflects the functionality of central semantic, phonological, and syntactic processing elements. The literate adults routinely interact with both spoken and written language and a comprehensive assessment framework of language processing must encompass both modalities (linguistic and reading) for individuals with alexia, specific to Indian languages. Owing to the transparent writing system of the Kannada language, a multimodal phonological and lexical-based reading treatment may prove to be beneficial in remediating reading impairments among adult post-stroke survivors.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76d4/11284617/80ccd47b5474/cureus-0016-00000063437-i04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76d4/11284617/b968094c9856/cureus-0016-00000063437-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76d4/11284617/2f9f5f1bae81/cureus-0016-00000063437-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76d4/11284617/26b0f137f7e1/cureus-0016-00000063437-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76d4/11284617/80ccd47b5474/cureus-0016-00000063437-i04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76d4/11284617/b968094c9856/cureus-0016-00000063437-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76d4/11284617/2f9f5f1bae81/cureus-0016-00000063437-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76d4/11284617/26b0f137f7e1/cureus-0016-00000063437-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76d4/11284617/80ccd47b5474/cureus-0016-00000063437-i04.jpg
摘要

引言

失读症是一种后天性病症,由于参与阅读过程的大脑区域受损,导致理解和/或朗读书面文字的能力受损。正如失语症患者的语言方面具有多面性一样,每个失语症患者的阅读障碍也因其语言缺陷的类型和性质而有很大差异。每种语言都有其独特的语言属性。无论障碍是在口语形式还是书面形式中,语言差异在这两个方面的分离都是至关重要的。鉴于卡纳达语多样的拼写特征,除了对后天阅读困难个体的口语技能损伤进行研究外,本研究还强调区分与阅读障碍相关的并发语言过程。

目的

本研究旨在探讨患有后天失读症的卡纳达语中风后幸存者的口语和阅读能力之间的关系。

方法

本研究通过方便抽样招募了15名有阅读障碍主诉的卡纳达语成年患者。入选的参与者包括男性和女性,平均年龄为42.2岁(标准差=15.58;范围=20-68),接受过16年正规教育。本研究进行了三项主要调查:a)语言方面,b)口头阅读,以及c)阅读理解。语言任务包括语义、句法和语音任务。口头阅读包括实词和非实词阅读任务。阅读理解任务包括单词层面、句子层面和段落层面的任务。

结果

语言、口头阅读和阅读理解的总体领域表现结果显示,语言方面表现最佳(M=71.77,标准差=19.18),其次是阅读理解(M=70.55,标准差=24.10)和口头阅读(M=41.55,标准差=24.66),差异具有统计学意义(p<0.05)。在比较失语症患者在语言领域内的能力时,语音方面的表现最弱(M=58.06,标准差=12.44),而句法(M=71.13)和语义(M=85.33)方面表现较好。比较口头阅读和阅读理解的阅读能力,差异具有统计学意义(p<0.05),阅读理解能力更强(M=72.65,标准差=24.10)。口头阅读和阅读理解中任务特定的变异性均具有统计学意义(p<0.05),其中,实词阅读(M=58.22)和单个层面的理解(M=80.22)表现较好。相关分析结果显示,语义(r=0.494,p<0.05)和语音(r=0.428,p>0.05)与口头阅读能力高度正相关。句法(r=0.412,p>0.05)和语义(r=0.377,p>0.05)与阅读理解能力强正相关。

结论

该研究令人信服地表明,与阅读相关任务的表现反映了中枢语义、语音和句法处理元素的功能。有文化的成年人经常与口语和书面语言进行互动,对于患有失读症的个体,特定于印度语言的语言处理综合评估框架必须涵盖这两种模式(语言和阅读)。由于卡纳达语的书写系统具有透明性,基于多模态语音和词汇的阅读治疗可能被证明对改善成年中风后幸存者的阅读障碍有益。

相似文献

1
Appraising Linguistic and Reading Impairments in Kannada-Speaking Persons With Central Alexia.评估患有中枢性失读症的卡纳达语使用者的语言和阅读障碍。
Cureus. 2024 Jun 29;16(6):e63437. doi: 10.7759/cureus.63437. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
Agraphia失写症
3
The Relationship Between Non-Orthographic Language Abilities and Reading Performance in Chronic Aphasia: An Exploration of the Primary Systems Hypothesis.慢性失语症患者的非文字语言能力与阅读表现之间的关系:对主要系统假说的探索。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018 Dec 10;61(12):3038-3054. doi: 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-L-18-0058.
4
Common predictors of spoken and written language performance in aphasia, alexia, and agraphia.失语症、失读症和失写症中口语和书面语言表现的常见预测因素。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Nov 7;16:1025468. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.1025468. eCollection 2022.
5
Effects of intensive phonomotor treatment on reading in eight individuals with aphasia and phonological alexia.强化语音运动治疗对八名失语症和语音性失读症患者阅读能力的影响。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2014 May;23(2):S300-11. doi: 10.1044/2014_AJSLP-13-0083.
6
Post-stroke language disorders.中风后语言障碍
Acta Clin Croat. 2011 Mar;50(1):79-94.
7
Reading comprehension in children with specific language impairment: an examination of two subgroups.特定语言障碍儿童的阅读理解:两个亚组的考察
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2007 Jan-Feb;42(1):39-57. doi: 10.1080/13682820600693013.
8
Two types of phonological reading impairment in stroke aphasia.中风失语症中的两种语音阅读障碍类型。
Brain Commun. 2021 Aug 30;3(3):fcab194. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcab194. eCollection 2021.
9
Using word-picture verification to inform language impairment locus in chronic post-stroke aphasia.运用文字-图像验证来确定慢性中风后失语症的语言损伤部位。
Front Rehabil Sci. 2022 Oct 31;3:1012588. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2022.1012588. eCollection 2022.
10
Alexia and agraphia in Spanish.西班牙语的失读症和失写症。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2020 Nov;55(6):875-883. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12566. Epub 2020 Jul 31.

本文引用的文献

1
Common predictors of spoken and written language performance in aphasia, alexia, and agraphia.失语症、失读症和失写症中口语和书面语言表现的常见预测因素。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Nov 7;16:1025468. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.1025468. eCollection 2022.
2
The Relationship Between Non-Orthographic Language Abilities and Reading Performance in Chronic Aphasia: An Exploration of the Primary Systems Hypothesis.慢性失语症患者的非文字语言能力与阅读表现之间的关系:对主要系统假说的探索。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018 Dec 10;61(12):3038-3054. doi: 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-L-18-0058.
3
Different Cognitive Profiles of Patients with Severe Aphasia.
重度失语症患者的不同认知特征
Behav Neurol. 2017;2017:3875954. doi: 10.1155/2017/3875954. Epub 2017 May 29.
4
The Effects of Repeated Reading on Reading Fluency for Students With Reading Disabilities.重复阅读对阅读障碍学生阅读流畅性的影响。
J Learn Disabil. 2017 Mar/Apr;50(2):213-224. doi: 10.1177/0022219415605194. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
5
Connectionist neuropsychology: uncovering ultimate causes of acquired dyslexia.连接主义神经心理学:揭示获得性失读症的根本原因。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2013 Dec 9;369(1634):20120398. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0398. Print 2014.
6
Words and objects at the tip of the left temporal lobe in primary progressive aphasia.左侧颞叶顶叶原发性进行性失语症的单词和物体。
Brain. 2013 Feb;136(Pt 2):601-18. doi: 10.1093/brain/aws336. Epub 2013 Jan 29.
7
Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies.语义系统在哪里?120 项功能神经影像学研究的批判性回顾和荟萃分析。
Cereb Cortex. 2009 Dec;19(12):2767-96. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhp055. Epub 2009 Mar 27.
8
Phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia: cognitive mechanisms and neural substrates.语音性阅读障碍和书写障碍:认知机制与神经基础
Cortex. 2009 May;45(5):575-91. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2008.04.006. Epub 2008 Jun 5.
9
The Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (LEAP-Q): assessing language profiles in bilinguals and multilinguals.语言经验与熟练程度问卷(LEAP-Q):评估双语和多语者的语言概况。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2007 Aug;50(4):940-67. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2007/067).
10
Unlocking the nature of the phonological-deep dyslexia continuum: the keys to reading aloud are in phonology and semantics.揭示语音深层阅读障碍连续体的本质:大声朗读的关键在于语音和语义。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Mar;18(3):348-62. doi: 10.1162/089892906775990543.