• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较咨询模式与姑息治疗和肿瘤内科联合查房模式对急性医院医疗利用的影响 - 一项开放标签分步楔形集群随机试验。

Comparing the effect of a consult model versus an integrated palliative care and medical oncology co-rounding model on health care utilization in an acute hospital - an open-label stepped-wedge cluster-randomized trial.

机构信息

National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.

Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.

出版信息

Palliat Med. 2021 Sep;35(8):1578-1589. doi: 10.1177/02692163211022957.

DOI:10.1177/02692163211022957
PMID:34524044
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The benefit of specialist palliative care for cancer inpatients is established, but the best method to deliver specialist palliative care is unknown.

AIM

To compare a consult model versus a co-rounding model; both provide the same content of specialist palliative care to individual patients but differ in the level of integration between palliative care and oncology clinicians.

DESIGN

An open-label, cluster-randomized trial with stepped-wedge design. The primary outcome was hospital length of stay; secondary outcomes were 30-day readmissions and access to specialist palliative care. ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT03330509.

SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Cancer patients admitted to the oncology inpatient service of an acute hospital in Singapore.

RESULTS

A total of 5681 admissions from December 2017 to July 2019 were included, of which 5295 involved stage 3-4 cancer and 1221 received specialist palliative care review. Admissions in the co-rounding model had a shorter hospital length of stay than those in the consult model by 0.70 days (95%CI -0.04 to 1.45,  = 0.065) for all admissions. In the sub-group of stage 3-4 cancer patients, the length of stay was 0.85 days shorter (95%CI 0.05-1.65,  = 0.038). In the sub-group of admissions that received specialist palliative care review, the length of stay was 2.62 days shorter (95%CI 0.63-4.61,  = 0.010). Hospital readmission within 30 days (OR1.03, 95%CI 0.79-1.35,  = 0.822) and access to specialist palliative care (OR1.19, 95%CI 0.90-1.58,  = 0.215) were similar between the consult and co-rounding models.

CONCLUSIONS

The co-rounding model was associated with a shorter hospital length of stay. Readmissions within 30 days and access to specialist palliative care were similar.

摘要

背景

癌症住院患者接受专科姑息治疗的益处已得到证实,但提供专科姑息治疗的最佳方法尚不清楚。

目的

比较咨询模式与共同查房模式;两种模式均为个体患者提供相同内容的专科姑息治疗,但姑息治疗和肿瘤临床医生之间的整合程度不同。

设计

采用开放标签、群组随机试验和逐步楔形设计。主要结局是住院时间;次要结局为 30 天再入院和获得专科姑息治疗的机会。临床试验编号 NCT03330509。

地点/参与者:新加坡一家急性医院肿瘤住院服务部收治的癌症患者。

结果

共纳入 2017 年 12 月至 2019 年 7 月的 5681 例住院患者,其中 5295 例为 3-4 期癌症患者,1221 例接受了专科姑息治疗审查。共同查房模式的住院时间比咨询模式短 0.70 天(95%CI -0.04 至 1.45,  = 0.065),所有住院患者均如此。在 3-4 期癌症患者亚组中,住院时间缩短了 0.85 天(95%CI 0.05-1.65,  = 0.038)。在接受专科姑息治疗审查的亚组中,住院时间缩短了 2.62 天(95%CI 0.63-4.61,  = 0.010)。30 天内再入院(OR1.03,95%CI 0.79-1.35,  = 0.822)和获得专科姑息治疗(OR1.19,95%CI 0.90-1.58,  = 0.215)在咨询模式和共同查房模式之间相似。

结论

共同查房模式与较短的住院时间相关。30 天内再入院和获得专科姑息治疗的机会相似。

相似文献

1
Comparing the effect of a consult model versus an integrated palliative care and medical oncology co-rounding model on health care utilization in an acute hospital - an open-label stepped-wedge cluster-randomized trial.比较咨询模式与姑息治疗和肿瘤内科联合查房模式对急性医院医疗利用的影响 - 一项开放标签分步楔形集群随机试验。
Palliat Med. 2021 Sep;35(8):1578-1589. doi: 10.1177/02692163211022957.
2
Pilot Study of a Palliative Care and Medical Oncology Co-Rounding Model for Advanced Cancer Inpatients in a Tertiary Hospital in Singapore.新加坡一家三级医院针对晚期癌症住院患者的姑息治疗和肿瘤内科联合查房模式的初步研究。
J Palliat Med. 2018 Jan;21(1):95-98. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0186. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
3
Can an Integrated Palliative and Oncology Co-rounding Model Reduce Aggressive Care at the End of Life? Secondary Analysis of an Open-label Stepped-wedge Cluster-randomized Trial.姑息治疗与肿瘤学联合查房模式能否减少终末期的激进治疗?一项开放性标签、阶梯式、集群随机试验的二次分析。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2024 Apr;41(4):442-451. doi: 10.1177/10499091231180460. Epub 2023 May 28.
4
Experience of Patients in a Consult Model versus an Integrated Palliative Care and Medical Oncology Co-Rounding Model: A Qualitative Study.患者在咨询模式与姑息治疗和肿瘤内科联合查房模式下的体验:一项定性研究。
J Palliat Med. 2022 Feb;25(2):291-295. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2021.0361. Epub 2021 Nov 5.
5
Default Palliative Care Consultation for Seriously Ill Hospitalized Patients: A Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Trial.对重病住院患者进行常规姑息治疗会诊:一项实用的集群随机试验。
JAMA. 2024 Jan 16;331(3):224-232. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.25092.
6
Improving time to palliative care review with predictive modeling in an inpatient adult population: study protocol for a stepped-wedge, pragmatic randomized controlled trial.采用预测模型改善成年住院患者姑息治疗审查的时间:一项阶梯式、实用随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2021 Sep 16;22(1):635. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05546-5.
7
Inpatient Palliative Care Consultation and 30-Day Readmissions in Oncology.肿瘤内科的住院患者舒缓治疗会诊与 30 天再入院率。
J Palliat Med. 2018 Jan;21(1):62-68. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0172. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
8
Reducing time in acute hospitals: A stepped-wedge randomised control trial of a specialist palliative care intervention in residential care homes.减少急性医院住院时间:在养老院中实施专科姑息治疗干预的渐进式随机对照试验。
Palliat Med. 2020 May;34(5):571-579. doi: 10.1177/0269216319891077. Epub 2020 Jan 2.
9
A Palliative Radiation Oncology Consult Service Reduces Total Costs During Hospitalization.姑息性放射肿瘤学咨询服务可降低住院期间的总费用。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Jun;55(6):1452-1458. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.03.005. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
10
Impact of disinvestment from weekend allied health services across acute medical and surgical wards: 2 stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trials.削减急性内科和外科病房周末辅助医疗服务投入的影响:两项阶梯楔形整群随机对照试验
PLoS Med. 2017 Oct 31;14(10):e1002412. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002412. eCollection 2017 Oct.

引用本文的文献

1
Inclusion of unexposed clusters improves the precision of fixed effects analysis of stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials with binary and count outcomes.在二分类和计数结局的分步楔形群组随机试验中,纳入未暴露群组可提高固定效应分析的精度。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Oct 28;24(1):254. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02379-z.
2
The fixed-effects model for robust analysis of stepped-wedge cluster trials with a small number of clusters and continuous outcomes: a simulation study.稳健分析带有少量群组和连续结局的阶乘式群组试验的固定效应模型:一项模拟研究。
Trials. 2024 Oct 25;25(1):718. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08572-1.