School of Sociology, College of Social and Behavioral Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Community, Environment, and Policy, Mel & Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Public Health Rep. 2022 Jan-Feb;137(1):120-127. doi: 10.1177/00333549211045817. Epub 2021 Sep 15.
Frontline essential workers face elevated risks of exposure to COVID-19 because of the interactive nature of their jobs, which require high levels of interaction with the general public and coworkers. The impact of these elevated risks on the mental health of essential workers, especially outside the health care sector, is not well studied. To address this knowledge gap, we examined correlations between perceptions of workplace risks and mental health distress among grocery store workers in Arizona.
We collected the first statewide sample of essential workers outside the health care sector focused on mental health and well-being. A total of 3344 grocery store workers in Arizona completed an online survey in July 2020. We used multiple regression models to identify demographic and work-based correlates of mental health distress.
Levels of mental health distress among respondents were high: 557 of 3169 (17.6%) reported severe levels and 482 of 3168 (15.2%) reported moderate levels. Perceptions of workplace safety were strongly correlated with significantly reduced levels of mental health distress (ß = -1.44; SE = 0.20) and reduced perceived stress (ß = -0.97; SE = 0.16). Financially disadvantaged workers and employees aged <55 reported high levels of mental health distress. Perceptions of safety and protection in the workplace were significantly correlated with availability of safety trainings, social distancing, and policies governing customer behaviors.
Lacking sufficient workplace protections, grocery store employees in Arizona experienced high levels of mental health distress during the COVID-19 pandemic. Providing clear federal and state policies to employers to guide implementation of workplace protections may help reduce sources of mental health distress.
由于前线基本工作人员工作性质的互动性,他们需要与公众和同事进行高度互动,因此面临着更高的 COVID-19 暴露风险。这些高风险对基本工作人员(尤其是医疗保健部门以外的工作人员)的心理健康的影响尚未得到充分研究。为了弥补这一知识空白,我们研究了亚利桑那州杂货店工作人员对工作场所风险的认知与心理健康困扰之间的相关性。
我们收集了亚利桑那州第一份针对医疗保健部门以外的基本工作人员的全州范围的心理健康和福祉样本。共有 3344 名杂货店员工在 2020 年 7 月完成了在线调查。我们使用多元回归模型来确定心理健康困扰的人口统计学和工作相关性。
受访者的心理健康困扰水平较高:3169 名受访者中有 557 人(17.6%)报告了严重程度,3168 名受访者中有 482 人(15.2%)报告了中度程度。对工作场所安全的看法与心理健康困扰显著降低(β=-1.44;SE=0.20)和感知压力降低(β=-0.97;SE=0.16)密切相关。经济处于劣势的工人和年龄<55 岁的员工报告了较高水平的心理健康困扰。对工作场所安全和保护的看法与安全培训、社交距离和客户行为规范的可用性显著相关。
由于缺乏足够的工作场所保护措施,亚利桑那州的杂货店员工在 COVID-19 大流行期间经历了较高水平的心理健康困扰。向雇主提供明确的联邦和州政策来指导工作场所保护措施的实施,可能有助于减轻心理健康困扰的来源。