Sarkadi Ştefan, Rutherford Alex, McBurney Peter, Parsons Simon, Rahwan Iyad
Inria, Sophia-Antipolis, France.
Department of Informatics, King's College London, London, UK.
R Soc Open Sci. 2021 Sep 8;8(9):201032. doi: 10.1098/rsos.201032. eCollection 2021 Sep.
Deception plays a critical role in the dissemination of information, and has important consequences on the functioning of cultural, market-based and democratic institutions. Deception has been widely studied within the fields of philosophy, psychology, economics and political science. Yet, we still lack an understanding of how deception emerges in a society under competitive (evolutionary) pressures. This paper begins to fill this gap by bridging evolutionary models of social good- (PGGs)-with ideas from (Buller and Burgoon 1996 , 203-242. (doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.1996.tb00127.x)) and (Levine 2014 , 378-392. (doi:10.1177/0261927X14535916); Levine 2019 . University of Alabama Press). This provides a well-founded analysis of the growth of deception in societies and the effectiveness of several approaches to reducing deception. Assuming that knowledge is a public good, we use extensive simulation studies to explore (i) how deception impacts the sharing and dissemination of knowledge in societies over time, (ii) how different types of knowledge sharing societies are affected by deception and (iii) what type of policing and regulation is needed to reduce the negative effects of deception in knowledge sharing. Our results indicate that cooperation in knowledge sharing can be re-established in systems by introducing institutions that investigate and regulate both defection and deception using a decentralized case-by-case strategy. This provides evidence for the adoption of methods for reducing the use of deception in the world around us in order to avoid a (Greco and Floridi 2004 , 73-81. (doi:10.1007/s10676-004-2895-2)).
欺骗在信息传播中起着关键作用,并对文化、市场和民主机构的运作产生重要影响。欺骗在哲学、心理学、经济学和政治学领域已得到广泛研究。然而,我们仍缺乏对欺骗在竞争(进化)压力下的社会中如何出现的理解。本文通过将社会公益博弈(PGGs)的进化模型与(布勒和伯贡,1996年,第203 - 242页。(doi:10.1111/j.1468 - 2885.1996.tb00127.x))以及(莱文,2014年,第378 - 392页。(doi:10.1177/0261927X14535916);莱文,2019年。阿拉巴马大学出版社)的观点相结合,开始填补这一空白。这为社会中欺骗的增长以及几种减少欺骗方法的有效性提供了有充分依据的分析。假设知识是一种公共物品,我们使用广泛的模拟研究来探索:(i)随着时间推移,欺骗如何影响社会中知识的共享和传播;(ii)不同类型的知识共享社会如何受到欺骗的影响;以及(iii)需要何种类型的监管和规制来减少欺骗在知识共享中的负面影响。我们的结果表明,通过引入采用分散式逐案策略对背叛和欺骗进行调查和监管的机构,知识共享系统中的合作可以得以重建。这为采用减少我们周围世界中欺骗行为的方法提供了证据,以避免(格雷科和弗洛里迪,2004年,第73 - 81页。(doi:10.1007/s10676 - 004 - 2895 - 2))。