ICMR-School of Public Health, ICMR-National Institute of Epidemiology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Division of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, ICMR-National Institute of Epidemiology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Indian J Med Res. 2021 May;153(5&6):546-549. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_365_21.
BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Infection fatality ratio (IFR) is considered a more robust and reliable indicator than case fatality ratio for severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Age- and sex-stratified IFRs are crucial to guide public health response. Infections estimated through representative community-based serosurveys would gauge more accurate IFRs than through modelling studies. We describe age- and sex-stratified IFR for COVID-19 estimated through serosurveys conducted in Chennai, India.
Two community-based serosurveys were conducted among individuals aged ≥10 yr during July and October 2020 in 51 of the 200 wards spread across 15 zones of Chennai. Total number of SARS-CoV-2 infections were estimated by multiplying the total population of the city aged ≥10 yr with the weighted seroprevalence and IFR was calculated by dividing the number of deaths with the estimated number of infections.
IFR was 17.3 [95% confidence interval (CI): 14.1-21.6] and 16.6 (95% CI: 13.8-20.2) deaths/10,000 infections during July and October 2020, respectively. Individuals aged 10-19 years had the lowest IFR [first serosurvey (R1): 0.2/10,000, 95% CI: 0.2-0.3 and second serosurvey (R2): 0.2/10,000, 95% CI: 0.1-0.2], and it increased with age and was highest among individuals aged above 60 yr (R1: 140.0/10,000, 95% CI: 107.0-183.8 and R2: 111.2/10,000, 95% CI: 89.2-142.0).
INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggested that the IFR increased with age and was high among the elderly. Therefore, elderly population need to be prioritized for public health interventions including vaccination, frequent testing in long-term care facilities and old age homes, close clinical monitoring of the infected and promoting strict adherence to non-pharmaceutical interventions.
感染病死率(IFR)被认为是比病死率更能准确反映 SARS-CoV-2 感染严重程度的指标。按年龄和性别分层的 IFR 对于指导公共卫生应对至关重要。通过具有代表性的社区血清学调查估计的感染率比通过模型研究估计的更准确。我们描述了在印度钦奈进行的血清学调查中按年龄和性别分层的 COVID-19 IFR。
2020 年 7 月和 10 月期间,在钦奈市的 15 个区的 200 个分区中,对年龄≥10 岁的个体进行了两次社区血清学调查。通过将全市≥10 岁的总人口乘以加权血清阳性率,估计 SARS-CoV-2 感染的总人数,IFR 是通过将死亡人数除以估计的感染人数计算得出的。
2020 年 7 月和 10 月的 IFR 分别为 17.3(95%置信区间[CI]:14.1-21.6)和 16.6(95% CI:13.8-20.2)每 10000 例感染死亡人数。年龄在 10-19 岁的个体的 IFR 最低[第一次血清学调查(R1):0.2/10000,95%CI:0.2-0.3 和第二次血清学调查(R2):0.2/10000,95%CI:0.1-0.2],随着年龄的增长而增加,在 60 岁以上的个体中最高[R1:140.0/10000,95%CI:107.0-183.8 和 R2:111.2/10000,95%CI:89.2-142.0]。
我们的研究结果表明,IFR 随年龄增长而增加,在老年人中较高。因此,需要将老年人群作为公共卫生干预措施的重点,包括疫苗接种、在长期护理设施和养老院中进行频繁检测、密切监测感染者并促进严格遵守非药物干预措施。