• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多西环素与阿奇霉素治疗直肠衣原体感染的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Efficacy of doxycycline versus azithromycin for the treatment of rectal chlamydia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Emergency Department, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.

Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

J Antimicrob Chemother. 2021 Nov 12;76(12):3103-3110. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkab335.

DOI:10.1093/jac/dkab335
PMID:34529798
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Chlamydia trachomatis infection is the most common sexually transmitted infectious disease and carries a risk of complications. However, the optimal treatment for rectal chlamydial infection remains unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy of doxycycline and azithromycin for the treatment of rectal chlamydia by undertaking a systematic review and meta-analysis of published data.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and clinicaltrials.gov databases from inception to 7 July 2021 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies that compared the efficacy of doxycycline and single-dose azithromycin on rectal chlamydia cure rates. Data were synthesized using a random-effects model, and subgroup analysis was conducted.

RESULTS

All included studies were conducted in developed countries. Two RCTs and nine observational studies, with a total of 2457 patients, were analysed. Doxycycline had a higher microbiological cure rate than azithromycin (risk ratio = 1.21; 95% CI = 1.15-1.28; P < 0.05). Pooled results from two RCTs also revealed a higher microbiological cure rate for doxycycline than azithromycin (risk ratio = 1.27; 95% CI = 1.20-1.35; P < 0.05). The results remained consistent in subgroups of different study designs, countries and sexes.

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of our findings, we recommend doxycycline rather than azithromycin as a first-line treatment for rectal chlamydia in developed countries. More RCTs from developing countries are warranted.

摘要

背景

沙眼衣原体感染是最常见的性传播传染病,存在并发症风险。然而,直肠衣原体感染的最佳治疗方法仍不明确。

目的

通过对已发表数据进行系统评价和荟萃分析,比较多西环素和阿奇霉素治疗直肠衣原体的疗效。

方法

我们检索了 PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane 图书馆、Web of Science 和 clinicaltrials.gov 数据库,检索时间从建库至 2021 年 7 月 7 日,纳入比较多西环素和单次剂量阿奇霉素治疗直肠衣原体治愈率的随机对照试验(RCT)和观察性研究。采用随机效应模型对数据进行综合分析,并进行亚组分析。

结果

所有纳入的研究均在发达国家进行。分析了 2 项 RCT 和 9 项观察性研究,共纳入 2457 例患者。多西环素的微生物学治愈率高于阿奇霉素(风险比=1.21;95%CI=1.15-1.28;P<0.05)。来自 2 项 RCT 的汇总结果也显示,多西环素的微生物学治愈率高于阿奇霉素(风险比=1.27;95%CI=1.20-1.35;P<0.05)。不同研究设计、国家和性别的亚组分析结果一致。

结论

基于我们的研究结果,建议在发达国家将多西环素而非阿奇霉素作为直肠衣原体感染的一线治疗药物。需要来自发展中国家的更多 RCT。

相似文献

1
Efficacy of doxycycline versus azithromycin for the treatment of rectal chlamydia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.多西环素与阿奇霉素治疗直肠衣原体感染的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2021 Nov 12;76(12):3103-3110. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkab335.
2
Antibiotics for treating urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in men and non-pregnant women.用于治疗男性和非妊娠女性泌尿生殖系统沙眼衣原体感染的抗生素。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jan 25;1(1):CD010871. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010871.pub2.
3
Treatment Effectiveness of Azithromycin and Doxycycline in Uncomplicated Rectal and Vaginal Chlamydia trachomatis Infections in Women: A Multicenter Observational Study (FemCure).阿奇霉素和多西环素治疗女性单纯性直肠和阴道沙眼衣原体感染的疗效:一项多中心观察性研究(FemCure)
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Nov 13;69(11):1946-1954. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz050.
4
Challenges in Treating , Including Rectal Infections: Is It Time to Go Back to Doxycycline?治疗复杂性尿路感染的挑战,包括直肠感染:是时候重新使用多西环素了吗?
Ann Pharmacother. 2022 Mar;56(3):330-338. doi: 10.1177/10600280211029945. Epub 2021 Jul 3.
5
The efficacy of azithromycin and doxycycline for the treatment of rectal chlamydia infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.阿奇霉素和多西环素治疗直肠衣原体感染的疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015 May;70(5):1290-7. doi: 10.1093/jac/dku574. Epub 2015 Jan 29.
6
Interventions for treating genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in pregnancy.妊娠期生殖道沙眼衣原体感染的治疗干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 22;9(9):CD010485. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010485.pub2.
7
Azithromycin versus doxycycline for the treatment of genital chlamydia infection: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.阿奇霉素与多西环素治疗生殖器衣原体感染的比较:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Jul 15;59(2):193-205. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu220. Epub 2014 Apr 11.
8
Azithromycin or Doxycycline for Asymptomatic Rectal .阿奇霉素或多西环素治疗无症状直肠.
N Engl J Med. 2021 Jun 24;384(25):2418-2427. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2031631.
9
Randomized, open-label, multicenter study of azithromycin compared with doxycycline for treating anorectal Chlamydia trachomatis infection concomitant to a vaginal infection (CHLAZIDOXY study).阿奇霉素与多西环素治疗合并阴道感染的肛门直肠沙眼衣原体感染的随机、开放标签、多中心研究(CHLAZIDOXY研究)
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Feb;98(7):e14572. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014572.
10
Treatment efficacy of azithromycin 1 g single dose versus doxycycline 100 mg twice daily for 7 days for the treatment of rectal chlamydia among men who have sex with men - a double-blind randomised controlled trial protocol.阿奇霉素1克单剂量与多西环素100毫克每日两次连用7天治疗男男性行为者直肠衣原体感染的疗效比较——一项双盲随机对照试验方案
BMC Infect Dis. 2017 Jan 6;17(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12879-016-2125-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Zoonotic transmission of from domestic cats; A case series of chronic follicular conjunctivitis in humans.家猫的人畜共患病传播;人类慢性滤泡性结膜炎病例系列
New Microbes New Infect. 2024 Apr 14;59:101412. doi: 10.1016/j.nmni.2024.101412. eCollection 2024 Jun.