Davisson Erin K, Andrade Fernanda C, Godwin Jennifer, Hoyle Rick
Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Center for Child and Family Policy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 17;20(1):e0317777. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317777. eCollection 2025.
Socioeconomic status (SES) is associated with well-being outcomes across studies; however, there is wide variation in its measurement, particularly in adolescence. One key difference in measures of SES concerns whether participants relay objective information-for example, years of education, household income-or subjective perceptions of socioeconomic status, either with or without reference to others or society. Although parents are often considered the best source of SES information-especially objective SES-within families, interviewing parents within the context of adolescent research is costly, time-consuming, and not always feasible. Given the importance of SES for outcomes in adolescence and cumulative effects over the lifespan, we used data from adolescents (N = 702) and parents (Ns = 664-730) to examine whether adolescent reports of SES serve as reasonable proxies for parent reports of both objective and subjective SES, as well as administrative data assessing family SES and neighborhood SES. Consistent with our hypotheses, adolescents' reports of subjective SES were moderately correlated with parent reports and administrative data tapping family SES. Moreover, adolescents' reports of subjective SES predicted adolescent-reported measures of well-being, including mental health, physical health, school performance, problem behavior, and alcohol use to the same degree as or better than parent reports of both subjective and objective SES and administrative data. These findings suggest that adolescent reports of subjective SES-using two different, easily understood measures-can stand in as reasonable alternatives to parent-reported SES and administrative data.
在各项研究中,社会经济地位(SES)都与幸福结果相关;然而,其衡量方式存在很大差异,尤其是在青少年时期。SES衡量方式的一个关键差异在于,参与者传达的是客观信息(例如受教育年限、家庭收入),还是对社会经济地位的主观认知,无论是否参考他人或社会情况。尽管父母通常被认为是家庭中SES信息(尤其是客观SES)的最佳来源,但在青少年研究背景下采访父母成本高、耗时,且并不总是可行的。鉴于SES对青少年结果的重要性以及其在整个生命周期中的累积影响,我们使用了青少年(N = 702)和父母(Ns = 664 - 730)的数据,来检验青少年对SES的报告是否可作为父母对客观和主观SES报告以及评估家庭SES和邻里SES的行政数据的合理替代指标。与我们的假设一致,青少年对主观SES的报告与父母报告以及反映家庭SES的行政数据呈中度相关。此外,青少年对主观SES的报告在预测青少年报告的幸福指标方面,包括心理健康、身体健康、学业成绩、问题行为和饮酒情况,与父母对主观和客观SES的报告以及行政数据的预测程度相同或更好。这些发现表明,青少年使用两种不同的、易于理解的测量方法对主观SES的报告,可以作为父母报告的SES和行政数据的合理替代。