• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

获得专门女性生殖器切割医疗保健服务的障碍和促进因素:挪威索马里和苏丹妇女的经验。

Barriers and facilitators to the access to specialized female genital cutting healthcare services: Experiences of Somali and Sudanese women in Norway.

机构信息

Section for Trauma, Catastrophes and Forced Migration-Adults and Elderly, Norwegian Centre for Violence and Traumatic Stress Studies, Oslo, Norway.

Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Sep 17;16(9):e0257588. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257588. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0257588
PMID:34534248
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8448310/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Girls and women subjected to female genital cutting (FGC) risk experiencing obstetrical, gynecological, sexual, and psychological health problems. Therefore, Norway has established low-threshold specialized healthcare services where girls and women with FGC-related health problems can directly seek medical attention. Nevertheless, we lack data about access to these services, especially for non-maternity-related purposes. In this article, we explore experiences of seeking medical attention for health problems that are potentially FGC-related, aiming to identify factors that hinder or facilitate access to FGC-specialized services.

METHODS

We conducted a qualitative study in three Norwegian cities employing semi-structured repeat interviews with 26 girls and women subjected to FGC, participant observation, and three validation focus group discussions with 17 additional participants. We thematically analyzed the data and approached access as a dynamic process of interactions between individuals and the healthcare system that lasts from an initial perception of need until reception of healthcare appropriate to that need.

FINDINGS

We identified several barriers to healthcare, including 1) uncertainty about FGC as a cause of experienced health problems, 2) unfamiliarity with FGC-specialized services, 3) lack of assessment by general practitioners of FGC as a potential cause of health problems, and 4) negative interactions with healthcare providers. In contrast, factors facilitating healthcare included: 1) receiving information on FGC-related health problems and FGC-specialized services from a non-profit immigrant organization, 2) referral to gynecologists with good knowledge of FGC, and 3) positive interactions with healthcare providers.

CONCLUSION

Assessing whether FGC is the cause for experienced health problems requires diagnostic competency and should not be left entirely to the patients. We recommend that Norwegian policymakers acknowledge the central role of GPs in the clinical management of patients with FGC-related health problems and provide them with comprehensive training on FGC.

摘要

背景

接受女性生殖器切割(FGC)的女孩和妇女面临着产科、妇科、性健康和心理健康问题的风险。因此,挪威设立了低门槛的专门医疗保健服务,接受过 FGC 的女孩和妇女可以直接寻求医疗关注。然而,我们缺乏关于这些服务的获取途径的数据,尤其是与产妇无关的目的。在本文中,我们探讨了寻求与 FGC 相关的健康问题的医疗关注的经验,旨在确定阻碍或促进 FGC 专门服务获取的因素。

方法

我们在挪威的三个城市进行了一项定性研究,采用半结构化重复访谈的方式,对 26 名接受过 FGC 的女孩和妇女进行了访谈,对参与者进行了观察,并与另外 17 名参与者进行了三次验证焦点小组讨论。我们对数据进行了主题分析,并将获取途径视为个体与医疗保健系统之间互动的动态过程,该过程从最初的需求感知一直持续到接受适合该需求的医疗保健。

发现

我们确定了一些医疗保健障碍,包括 1)对 FGC 作为经历的健康问题的原因的不确定性,2)对 FGC 专门服务的不熟悉,3)全科医生对 FGC 作为潜在健康问题的原因缺乏评估,4)与医疗保健提供者的负面互动。相比之下,促进医疗保健的因素包括:1)从非营利性移民组织获得有关 FGC 相关健康问题和 FGC 专门服务的信息,2)转诊给对 FGC 有深入了解的妇科医生,3)与医疗保健提供者的积极互动。

结论

评估 FGC 是否是经历的健康问题的原因需要诊断能力,不应完全由患者承担。我们建议挪威政策制定者承认全科医生在处理与 FGC 相关的健康问题的患者方面的核心作用,并为他们提供有关 FGC 的全面培训。

相似文献

1
Barriers and facilitators to the access to specialized female genital cutting healthcare services: Experiences of Somali and Sudanese women in Norway.获得专门女性生殖器切割医疗保健服务的障碍和促进因素:挪威索马里和苏丹妇女的经验。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 17;16(9):e0257588. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257588. eCollection 2021.
2
Sexual norms and the intention to use healthcare services related to female genital cutting: A qualitative study among Somali and Sudanese women in Norway.性规范与女性生殖器切割相关的医疗保健服务意愿:挪威的索马里和苏丹女性的定性研究。
PLoS One. 2020 May 18;15(5):e0233440. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233440. eCollection 2020.
3
Barriers to access to the Norwegian healthcare system among sub-Saharan African immigrant women exposed to female genital cutting.在遭受女性外阴残割的撒哈拉以南非洲移民妇女中,获得挪威医疗保健系统的障碍。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 18;15(3):e0229770. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229770. eCollection 2020.
4
Factors associated with general practitioners' routines and comfortability with assessing female genital cutting: a cross-sectional survey.与全科医生评估女性生殖器切割的常规做法和舒适度相关的因素:一项横断面调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jan 25;23(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09085-4.
5
U.S.-Based Obstetrician/Gynecologists' Experiences with Delivering Care to Women with Female Genital Cutting.美国妇产科医生提供女性生殖器切割女性护理的经验
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2023 Apr;32(4):486-493. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2022.0294. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
6
Perceptions of obstetrical interventions and female genital cutting: insights of men in a Somali refugee community.对产科干预和女性割礼的看法:索马里难民社区男性的观点。
Ethn Health. 2014 Aug;19(4):440-57. doi: 10.1080/13557858.2013.828829. Epub 2013 Aug 20.
7
A Meta-Synthesis of the Birth Experiences of African Immigrant Women Affected by Female Genital Cutting.对受女性生殖器切割影响的非洲移民妇女分娩经历的元综合分析。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2018 Mar;63(2):185-195. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12708. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
8
Attitudes towards comparison of male and female genital cutting in a Swedish Somali population.瑞典索马里人群中对男性和女性生殖器切割比较的态度。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021 Apr;100(4):604-613. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14114. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
9
Building community-based participatory research partnerships with a Somali refugee community.与索马里难民社区建立基于社区的参与式研究伙伴关系。
Am J Prev Med. 2009 Dec;37(6 Suppl 1):S230-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.09.036.
10
Exploring barriers to seeking health care among Kenyan Somali women with female genital mutilation: a qualitative study.探究肯尼亚索马里女性割礼女性寻求医疗保健的障碍:一项定性研究。
BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2020 Jan 28;20(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12914-020-0222-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Discerning Deinfibulation: Impact of Personal, Professional, and Familial Influences on Decision-Making.识别阴蒂切开术解除术:个人、职业和家庭因素对决策的影响
Qual Health Res. 2025 Feb;35(2):234-247. doi: 10.1177/10497323241257094. Epub 2024 Aug 8.
2
Examining the key features of specialist health service provision for women with Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting (FGM/C) in the Global North: a scoping review.审视全球北方地区为遭受女性生殖器切割/环切(FGM/C)的女性提供专科医疗服务的关键特征:一项范围综述
Front Glob Womens Health. 2024 May 22;5:1329819. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2024.1329819. eCollection 2024.
3
"A part of my life". A qualitative study about perceptions of female genital mutilation and experiences of healthcare among affected women residing in Sweden.《我的一部分生活》。一项关于瑞典居住的受女性生殖器割礼影响的女性对女性生殖器割礼的看法和医疗保健体验的定性研究。
BMC Womens Health. 2024 May 22;24(1):304. doi: 10.1186/s12905-024-03149-1.
4
Female genital mutilation in the Canary Islands: A qualitative study on the perspectives of women and healthcare professionals.加那利群岛的女性生殖器切割:一项关于女性和医疗保健专业人员观点的定性研究。
Heliyon. 2023 May 24;9(6):e16223. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16223. eCollection 2023 Jun.
5
Female genital mutilation/cutting: going beyond urogynecologic complications and obstetric outcomes.女性生殖器切割/割礼:超越尿生殖妇科并发症和产科结局。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023 Oct;308(4):1067-1074. doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-06929-6. Epub 2023 Jan 27.
6
Factors associated with general practitioners' routines and comfortability with assessing female genital cutting: a cross-sectional survey.与全科医生评估女性生殖器切割的常规做法和舒适度相关的因素:一项横断面调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jan 25;23(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09085-4.
7
Discourses of change: The shift from infibulation to sunna circumcision among Somali and Sudanese migrants in Norway.变化的论述:挪威的索马里和苏丹移民中从阴蒂缝合到逊尼割礼的转变。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 17;17(6):e0268322. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268322. eCollection 2022.
8
Religion, Health, and Life Satisfaction Among Somali and Gambian Women in Norway.挪威索马里和冈比亚女性的宗教、健康与生活满意度
J Relig Health. 2022 Aug;61(4):2975-2991. doi: 10.1007/s10943-022-01561-1. Epub 2022 Apr 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Conversations about FGM in primary care: a realist review on how, why and under what circumstances FGM is discussed in general practice consultations.基层医疗保健中的女性生殖器官切割问题对话:关于一般医疗咨询中讨论女性生殖器官切割的方式、原因和在何种情况下进行讨论的真实情况综述。
BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 22;11(3):e039809. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039809.
2
Norway: Health System Review.挪威:卫生体系综述。
Health Syst Transit. 2020 Jan;22(1):1-163.
3
Female genital mutilation and women's healthcare experiences with general practitioners in the Netherlands: A qualitative study.女性外阴残割与荷兰女性全科医生就诊经历:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 7;15(7):e0235867. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235867. eCollection 2020.
4
Sexual norms and the intention to use healthcare services related to female genital cutting: A qualitative study among Somali and Sudanese women in Norway.性规范与女性生殖器切割相关的医疗保健服务意愿:挪威的索马里和苏丹女性的定性研究。
PLoS One. 2020 May 18;15(5):e0233440. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233440. eCollection 2020.
5
Barriers to access to the Norwegian healthcare system among sub-Saharan African immigrant women exposed to female genital cutting.在遭受女性外阴残割的撒哈拉以南非洲移民妇女中,获得挪威医疗保健系统的障碍。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 18;15(3):e0229770. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229770. eCollection 2020.
6
Seeking culturally safe care: a qualitative systematic review of the healthcare experiences of women and girls who have undergone female genital mutilation/cutting.寻求文化安全的护理:对经历女性生殖器切割的妇女和女孩的医疗保健体验的定性系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2019 May 29;9(5):e027452. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027452.
7
Crossing cultural divides: A qualitative systematic review of factors influencing the provision of healthcare related to female genital mutilation from the perspective of health professionals.跨越文化鸿沟:从卫生专业人员的角度出发,对影响提供与女性割礼相关的医疗保健服务的因素进行定性系统评价。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 4;14(3):e0211829. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211829. eCollection 2019.
8
Knowledge, attitudes and practices of primary healthcare professionals to female genital mutilation in Valencia, Spain: are we ready for this challenge?西班牙巴伦西亚初级医疗保健专业人员对女性生殖器切割的知识、态度和做法:我们准备好应对这一挑战了吗?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jul 24;18(1):579. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3396-z.
9
It is a problem and it is not a problem: Dilemmatic talk of the psychological effects of female genital cutting.这是一个问题,又不是一个问题:关于女性割礼心理影响的两难讨论。
J Health Psychol. 2020 Oct;25(12):1917-1929. doi: 10.1177/1359105318781904. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
10
Psychopathological sequelae of female genital mutilation and their neuroendocrinological associations.女性生殖器切割的心理病理学后果及其神经内分泌关联。
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Jun 13;18(1):187. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1757-0.