• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

COVID-19 住院患者 SOFA 评分的种族差异。

Racial disparities in the SOFA score among patients hospitalized with COVID-19.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.

Equity Research and Innovation Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Sep 17;16(9):e0257608. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257608. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0257608
PMID:34535009
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8448580/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score predicts probability of in-hospital mortality. Many crisis standards of care suggest the use of SOFA scores to allocate medical resources during the COVID-19 pandemic.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Are SOFA scores elevated among Non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic patients hospitalized with COVID-19, compared to Non-Hispanic White patients?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Retrospective cohort study conducted in Yale New Haven Health System, including 5 hospitals with total of 2681 beds. Study population drawn from consecutive patients aged ≥18 admitted with COVID-19 from March 29th to August 1st, 2020. Patients excluded from the analysis if not their first admission with COVID-19, if they did not have SOFA score recorded within 24 hours of admission, if race and ethnicity data were not Non-Hispanic Black, Non-Hispanic White, or Hispanic, or if they had other missing data. The primary outcome was SOFA score, with peak score within 24 hours of admission dichotomized as <6 or ≥6.

RESULTS

Of 2982 patients admitted with COVID-19, 2320 met inclusion criteria and were analyzed, of whom 1058 (45.6%) were Non-Hispanic White, 645 (27.8%) were Hispanic, and 617 (26.6%) were Non-Hispanic Black. Median age was 65.0 and 1226 (52.8%) were female. In univariate logistic screen and in full multivariate model, Non-Hispanic Black patients but not Hispanic patients had greater odds of an elevated SOFA score ≥6 when compared to Non-Hispanic White patients (OR 1.49, 95%CI 1.11-1.99).

INTERPRETATION

Given current unequal patterns in social determinants of health, US crisis standards of care utilizing the SOFA score to allocate medical resources would be more likely to deny these resources to Non-Hispanic Black patients.

摘要

背景

序贯器官衰竭评估 (SOFA) 评分可预测住院患者死亡率。许多危重病护理标准建议在 COVID-19 大流行期间使用 SOFA 评分来分配医疗资源。

研究问题

与非西班牙裔白人患者相比,因 COVID-19 住院的非西班牙裔黑人和西班牙裔患者的 SOFA 评分是否升高?

研究设计和方法

这是在耶鲁纽黑文卫生系统进行的回顾性队列研究,包括 5 家拥有 2681 张床位的医院。研究人群来自 2020 年 3 月 29 日至 8 月 1 日连续因 COVID-19 入院且年龄≥18 岁的患者。如果患者不是首次因 COVID-19 入院、入院 24 小时内未记录 SOFA 评分、种族和族裔数据不是非西班牙裔黑人、非西班牙裔白人或西班牙裔,或者如果患者存在其他缺失数据,则将其从分析中排除。主要结局是 SOFA 评分,入院 24 小时内的最高评分分为<6 或≥6。

结果

在 2982 名因 COVID-19 入院的患者中,有 2320 名符合纳入标准并进行了分析,其中 1058 名(45.6%)为非西班牙裔白人,645 名(27.8%)为西班牙裔,617 名(26.6%)为非西班牙裔黑人。中位年龄为 65.0 岁,1226 名(52.8%)为女性。在单变量逻辑筛选和全多变量模型中,与非西班牙裔白人患者相比,非西班牙裔黑人患者而非西班牙裔黑人患者的 SOFA 评分升高(OR 1.49,95%CI 1.11-1.99)。

解释

鉴于当前社会决定因素在健康方面的不平等模式,美国利用 SOFA 评分来分配医疗资源的危重病护理标准更有可能拒绝向非西班牙裔黑人患者提供这些资源。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca2c/8448580/3b486cb0284c/pone.0257608.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca2c/8448580/3b486cb0284c/pone.0257608.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca2c/8448580/3b486cb0284c/pone.0257608.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Racial disparities in the SOFA score among patients hospitalized with COVID-19.COVID-19 住院患者 SOFA 评分的种族差异。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 17;16(9):e0257608. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257608. eCollection 2021.
2
The potential impact of triage protocols on racial disparities in clinical outcomes among COVID-positive patients in a large academic healthcare system.分诊方案对大型学术医疗系统中 COVID-19 阳性患者临床结局的种族差异的潜在影响。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 16;16(9):e0256763. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256763. eCollection 2021.
3
Predictive Value of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score across Patients with and without COVID-19 Infection.序贯器官衰竭评估评分对合并和不合并 COVID-19 感染患者的预测价值。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2022 May;19(5):790-798. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202106-680OC.
4
Accuracy of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score for In-Hospital Mortality by Race and Relevance to Crisis Standards of Care.按种族划分的序贯器官衰竭评估评分对住院死亡率的准确性和与危重病标准护理的相关性。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jun 1;4(6):e2113891. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.13891.
5
SOFA score performs worse than age for predicting mortality in patients with COVID-19.SOFA 评分预测 COVID-19 患者死亡率的效果不如年龄。
PLoS One. 2024 May 17;19(5):e0301013. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301013. eCollection 2024.
6
Assessment of Disparities Associated With a Crisis Standards of Care Resource Allocation Algorithm for Patients in 2 US Hospitals During the COVID-19 Pandemic.评估在 COVID-19 大流行期间,美国两家医院的危机标准护理资源分配算法与患者相关的差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Mar 1;4(3):e214149. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.4149.
7
Sepsis Prediction Model for Determining Sepsis vs SIRS, qSOFA, and SOFA.用于区分脓毒症与全身炎症反应综合征(qSOFA 和 SOFA)的脓毒症预测模型。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Aug 1;6(8):e2329729. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.29729.
8
Racial and Ethnic Differences in Presentation and Outcomes for Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19: Findings From the American Heart Association's COVID-19 Cardiovascular Disease Registry.因 COVID-19 住院患者的临床表现和结局的种族和民族差异:美国心脏协会 COVID-19 心血管疾病登记研究的结果。
Circulation. 2021 Jun 15;143(24):2332-2342. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.052278. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
9
Assessment of Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Hospitalization and Mortality in Patients With COVID-19 in New York City.评估纽约市 COVID-19 患者住院和死亡的种族/民族差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Dec 1;3(12):e2026881. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.26881.
10
Assessment of a Crisis Standards of Care Scoring System for Resource Prioritization and Estimated Excess Mortality by Race, Ethnicity, and Socially Vulnerable Area During a Regional Surge in COVID-19.评估在 COVID-19 区域性激增期间,基于种族、民族和社会弱势群体的资源优先排序和估计超额死亡率的危机护理标准评分系统。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Mar 1;5(3):e221744. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.1744.

引用本文的文献

1
Nursing workload and severity of COVID-19 patients in the Intensive Care Unit.重症监护病房中 COVID-19 患者的护理工作量和严重程度。
Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2024 Aug 23;58:e20240107. doi: 10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2024-0107en. eCollection 2024.
2
SOFA score performs worse than age for predicting mortality in patients with COVID-19.SOFA 评分预测 COVID-19 患者死亡率的效果不如年龄。
PLoS One. 2024 May 17;19(5):e0301013. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301013. eCollection 2024.
3
Variation in Time Between Testing Positive for COVID-19 and Hospital Admission by Race/Ethnicity and Insurance Status.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient and Hospital Factors Associated With Differences in Mortality Rates Among Black and White US Medicare Beneficiaries Hospitalized With COVID-19 Infection.与 COVID-19 感染住院的美国医疗保险受益的黑人和白人患者死亡率差异相关的患者和医院因素。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jun 1;4(6):e2112842. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.12842.
2
Equitably Allocating Resources during Crises: Racial Differences in Mortality Prediction Models.危机期间公平分配资源:死亡率预测模型中的种族差异
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021 Jul 15;204(2):178-186. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202012-4383OC.
3
Racial Equity in Crisis Standards of Care-Reassuring Data or Reason for Concern?
新冠病毒检测呈阳性与因种族/族裔和保险状况而入院之间的时间差异。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2023;34(4):1290-1304.
4
Clinical factors associated with racial differences in the prevalence of occult hypoxemia: a retrospective case-control study.隐匿性低氧血症患病率种族差异相关的临床因素:一项回顾性病例对照研究。
medRxiv. 2024 Mar 29:2024.03.28.24305036. doi: 10.1101/2024.03.28.24305036.
5
Learning from COVID-19 triage schemes to face the next public health emergency.从新冠病毒分流方案中汲取经验以应对下一次突发公共卫生事件。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Apr;72(4):1298-1301. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18765. Epub 2024 Jan 29.
6
Simulation of New York City's Ventilator Allocation Guideline During the Spring 2020 COVID-19 Surge.模拟 2020 年春季纽约市 COVID-19 疫情期间的呼吸机分配指南。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Oct 2;6(10):e2336736. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.36736.
7
Triage Procedures for Critical Care Resource Allocation During Scarcity.危重病资源稀缺时的分诊程序。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Aug 1;6(8):e2329688. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.29688.
8
Association between Mortality and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score during a Short Stay in the Intensive Care Unit after Non-Cardiac Surgery.非心脏手术后在重症监护病房短期停留期间死亡率与序贯器官衰竭评估评分之间的关联
J Clin Med. 2022 Oct 4;11(19):5865. doi: 10.3390/jcm11195865.
9
Preparing for the Worst-Case Scenario in a Pandemic: Intensivists Simulate Prioritization and Triage of Scarce ICU Resources.大流行中最坏情况的准备:重症医学专家模拟稀缺 ICU 资源的优先级排序和分诊。
Crit Care Med. 2022 Dec 1;50(12):1714-1724. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005684. Epub 2022 Oct 12.
10
Artificial intelligence-based clinical decision support in pediatrics.基于人工智能的儿科临床决策支持。
Pediatr Res. 2023 Jan;93(2):334-341. doi: 10.1038/s41390-022-02226-1. Epub 2022 Jul 29.
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Mar 1;4(3):e214527. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.4527.
4
Discriminant Accuracy of the SOFA Score for Determining the Probable Mortality of Patients With COVID-19 Pneumonia Requiring Mechanical Ventilation.序贯器官衰竭评估评分对预测 COVID-19 肺炎机械通气患者病死率的判别准确性。
JAMA. 2021 Apr 13;325(14):1469-1470. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.1545.
5
Mitigating Inequities and Saving Lives with ICU Triage during the COVID-19 Pandemic.在 COVID-19 大流行期间通过 ICU 分诊减轻不平等和拯救生命。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021 Feb 1;203(3):287-295. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202010-3809CP.
6
Allocating scarce intensive care resources during the COVID-19 pandemic: practical challenges to theoretical frameworks.在 COVID-19 大流行期间分配稀缺的重症监护资源:理论框架面临的实际挑战。
Lancet Respir Med. 2021 Apr;9(4):430-434. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30580-4. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
7
Triage and justice in an unjust pandemic: ethical allocation of scarce medical resources in the setting of racial and socioeconomic disparities.不公正大流行中的分诊与正义:在种族和社会经济差异背景下稀缺医疗资源的伦理分配
J Med Ethics. 2020 Oct 16. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106457.
8
Developing a Triage Protocol for the COVID-19 Pandemic: Allocating Scarce Medical Resources in a Public Health Emergency.制定COVID-19大流行的分诊方案:在突发公共卫生事件中分配稀缺医疗资源
J Clin Ethics. 2020 Winter;31(4):303-317.
9
Crisis Standards of Care in the USA: A Systematic Review and Implications for Equity Amidst COVID-19.美国的危机护理标准:COVID-19 大流行期间公平性的系统评价及启示
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2021 Aug;8(4):824-836. doi: 10.1007/s40615-020-00840-5. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
10
Racial disparities in clinical presentation, type of intervention, and in-hospital outcomes of patients with metastatic spine disease: An analysis of 145,809 admissions in the United States.美国 145809 例转移性脊柱疾病患者的临床表现、干预类型和住院结局的种族差异分析。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2020 Oct;68:101792. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2020.101792. Epub 2020 Aug 9.