Suppr超能文献

颈椎间盘置换术:扩展适应证。

Cervical Total Disc Replacement: Expanded Indications.

机构信息

Hospital Lusíadas Porto; Centro Hospitalar de Gaia/Espinho, Rua Cónego Ferreira Pinto, 191, 4050-256 Porto, Portugal.

出版信息

Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2021 Oct;32(4):437-448. doi: 10.1016/j.nec.2021.05.002. Epub 2021 Jul 29.

Abstract

Cervical total disc replacement (cTDR) is now a firm alternative to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for degenerative disc disease (DDD). Robust level 1 data from Federal Drug Administration-approved clinical trials demonstrated that cTDR is in any case equally safe and effective compared with ACDF for 1- or 2-level DDD. Furthermore, from early postoperative to long-term follow-up of 10 to 15 years, cTDR rates superiorly in many primary clinical outcomes. According to the published literature, at least nine different cTDR devices share this consistent pattern. On the other hand, the surgical treatment of more than 2-level disc disease is haunted by an elusive paradox. It is easily understandable that 3- and 4-level ACDF, with the well-known associated limitations, is not the superlative intervention for a spine segment anatomically designed to provide motion, as cervical spine is. Furthermore, multilevel ACDF exacerbates many of the clinical and biomechanical complications related with single-level fusion. However, as cTDR is not immaculate of constraints and failures, its clinical safety and efficacy and cost-effectiveness in multilevel anterior compressive pathology need to be established. This article analyses the current available evidence supporting the expanded indication of cTDR to 3- and 4-level disc disease, either stand-alone or adjacent to fusion, from a less stringent European perspective.

摘要

颈椎全椎间盘置换术(cTDR)现在是治疗退行性椎间盘疾病(DDD)的一种替代前路颈椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)的可靠方法。来自美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)批准的临床试验的强有力的一级数据表明,cTDR 在任何情况下与 ACDF 相比,对于 1 或 2 节段的 DDD 都是同样安全有效的。此外,从术后早期到 10 至 15 年的长期随访中,cTDR 在许多主要临床结果方面都表现优异。根据已发表的文献,至少有 9 种不同的 cTDR 设备具有这种一致的模式。另一方面,对于超过 2 个节段的椎间盘疾病的手术治疗,存在着一个难以捉摸的悖论。很容易理解的是,3 或 4 个节段的 ACDF,由于众所周知的相关限制,对于颈椎这种解剖上设计用于提供运动的节段来说,并不是最佳的干预方法。此外,多节段 ACDF 会加剧与单节段融合相关的许多临床和生物力学并发症。然而,由于 cTDR 并非没有限制和失败,因此需要确定其在多节段前向压迫性病变中的临床安全性、有效性和成本效益。本文从一个相对宽松的欧洲角度分析了目前支持将 cTDR 扩展到 3 或 4 节段椎间盘疾病的适应证的现有证据,无论是单独使用还是与融合相邻使用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验