• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在新冠疫情期间,人们何时、为何以及如何偏离物理距离措施:一项混合方法研究。

When, why, and how do People Deviate from Physical Distancing Measures During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mixed-Methods Study.

作者信息

Van Alboom Maité, Baert Fleur, Wauters Aline, Beeckman Melanie, Maes Sarah, Kissi Ama, Veirman Elke, Van Ryckeghem Dimitri M L, De Paepe Annick, Poppe Louise

机构信息

Ghent Health Psychology Lab, Department of Experimental-Clinical and Health Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ghent University, BE.

Physical Activity & Health Research Group, Department of Movement and Sports Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, BE.

出版信息

Psychol Belg. 2021 Sep 2;61(1):262-273. doi: 10.5334/pb.1089. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.5334/pb.1089
PMID:34540263
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8415177/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

To limit the spread of COVID-19, many countries, including Belgium, have installed physical distancing measures. Yet, adherence to these newly installed behavioral measures has been described as challenging and effortful. Based on the Health Action Process Approach (HAPA) model, this study performed an in-depth evaluation of when, why, and how people deviated from the physical distancing measures.

METHODS

An online mixed-method study was conducted among Belgian adults (N = 2055) in the beginning of May 2020. Participants were recruited via an open call through email and social media platforms, using snowball sampling. Conditions wherein people deviated from the physical distancing measures were assessed by means of an open-ended question. HAPA determinants were assessed in a quantitative way.

RESULTS

Half of the sample reported to deviate from the measures. Further, deviation from the measures was associated with each determinant outlined by the HAPA. Findings highlight that many people deviated from the measures because of their need for social contact. The majority of the people who deviated from the measures stated that they carefully weighed the risks of their behavior.

CONCLUSIONS

Need for social contact pushed people to deviate from physical distancing measures in a deliberate manner. Potential areas for future interventions aimed at promoting adherence to physical distancing measures and enhancing psychosocial well-being are discussed.

摘要

引言

为了限制新冠病毒的传播,包括比利时在内的许多国家都实施了保持社交距离的措施。然而,人们一直认为遵守这些新实施的行为措施具有挑战性且需要付出努力。基于健康行动过程方法(HAPA)模型,本研究对人们何时、为何以及如何偏离保持社交距离的措施进行了深入评估。

方法

2020年5月初,对比利时成年人(N = 2055)开展了一项在线混合方法研究。通过电子邮件和社交媒体平台公开招募参与者,采用滚雪球抽样法。通过一个开放式问题评估人们偏离保持社交距离措施的情况。以定量方式评估HAPA决定因素。

结果

一半的样本报告称偏离了这些措施。此外,偏离这些措施与HAPA概述的每个决定因素都有关联。研究结果表明,许多人偏离这些措施是因为他们需要社交接触。大多数偏离这些措施的人表示,他们仔细权衡了自己行为的风险。

结论

对社交接触的需求促使人们故意偏离保持社交距离的措施。讨论了未来干预措施的潜在领域,旨在促进对保持社交距离措施的遵守并提高心理社会幸福感。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d464/8415177/ed54fa5c629e/pb-61-1-1089-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d464/8415177/b75ebc636de5/pb-61-1-1089-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d464/8415177/ed54fa5c629e/pb-61-1-1089-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d464/8415177/b75ebc636de5/pb-61-1-1089-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d464/8415177/ed54fa5c629e/pb-61-1-1089-g2.jpg

相似文献

1
When, why, and how do People Deviate from Physical Distancing Measures During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mixed-Methods Study.在新冠疫情期间,人们何时、为何以及如何偏离物理距离措施:一项混合方法研究。
Psychol Belg. 2021 Sep 2;61(1):262-273. doi: 10.5334/pb.1089. eCollection 2021.
2
Adherence to the Physical Distancing Measures during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A HAPA-Based Perspective.遵守 COVID-19 大流行期间的物理距离措施:基于 HAPA 的视角。
Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2020 Dec;12(4):1224-1243. doi: 10.1111/aphw.12242. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
3
Motivations for Social Distancing and App Use as Complementary Measures to Combat the COVID-19 Pandemic: Quantitative Survey Study.将社交距离和应用程序使用作为对抗新冠疫情补充措施的动机:定量调查研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 27;22(8):e21613. doi: 10.2196/21613.
4
Identifying and addressing psychosocial determinants of adherence to physical distancing guidance during the COVID-19 pandemic - project protocol.识别并应对2019冠状病毒病大流行期间遵守物理距离指导措施的社会心理决定因素——项目方案
HRB Open Res. 2020 Dec 14;3:58. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13090.2. eCollection 2020.
5
The Emotional Path to Action: Empathy Promotes Physical Distancing and Wearing of Face Masks During the COVID-19 Pandemic.从情感层面促进行动:同理心助力新冠疫情期间保持社交距离和佩戴口罩
Psychol Sci. 2020 Nov;31(11):1363-1373. doi: 10.1177/0956797620964422. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
6
Social distancing intentions to reduce the spread of COVID-19: The extended theory of planned behavior.旨在减少新冠病毒传播的社交距离意图:计划行为扩展理论
BMC Public Health. 2021 Oct 11;21(1):1836. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11884-5.
7
Threat, Coping, and Social Distance Adherence During COVID-19: Cross-Continental Comparison Using an Online Cross-Sectional Survey.新冠疫情期间的威胁、应对措施及社交距离遵守情况:基于在线横断面调查的跨大陆比较
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 18;22(11):e23019. doi: 10.2196/23019.
8
Challenges to the implementation and adoption of physical distancing measures against COVID-19 by internally displaced people in Mali: a qualitative study.马里境内流离失所者实施和采用针对新冠疫情的物理距离措施面临的挑战:一项定性研究
Confl Health. 2021 Dec 4;15(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s13031-021-00425-x.
9
Do people with mental health problems have lower adherence to precautionary measures in COVID-19 pandemic? A cross-sectional observational study in Hong Kong.在新冠疫情期间,有心理健康问题的人对预防措施的依从性较低吗?香港的一项横断面观察研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 12;11(8):e046658. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046658.
10
Assessment of mask-wearing adherence and social distancing compliance in public places in Hamadan, Iran, during the COVID-19 pandemic.伊朗哈马丹在 COVID-19 大流行期间公共场所戴口罩和保持社交距离遵守情况评估。
J Res Health Sci. 2021 Aug 30;21(3):e00526. doi: 10.34172/jrhs.2021.61.

引用本文的文献

1
Barriers to and facilitators of populational adherence to prevention and control measures of COVID-19 and other respiratory infectious diseases: a qualitative evidence synthesis.人口对 COVID-19 和其他呼吸道传染病的预防和控制措施的坚持的障碍和促进因素:定性证据综合。
Eur Respir Rev. 2023 Jun 21;32(168). doi: 10.1183/16000617.0238-2022. Print 2023 Jun 30.
2
Compliance with Barrier Gestures during COVID-19 Pandemic as a Function of the Context: A Longitudinal Observational Survey at the University of Liège.遵守新冠疫情期间的屏障手势:列日大学的一项纵向观察调查。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 13;19(18):11523. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811523.

本文引用的文献

1
Psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic within institutional quarantine and isolation centres and its sociodemographic correlates in Qatar: a cross-sectional study.卡塔尔机构检疫和隔离中心内 COVID-19 大流行的心理影响及其社会人口学相关性:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 31;11(1):e045794. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045794.
2
Adherence to the Physical Distancing Measures during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A HAPA-Based Perspective.遵守 COVID-19 大流行期间的物理距离措施:基于 HAPA 的视角。
Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2020 Dec;12(4):1224-1243. doi: 10.1111/aphw.12242. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
3
Application of the Health Action Process Approach to Social Distancing Behavior During COVID-19.
《健康行动过程方法在 COVID-19 期间社会隔离行为中的应用》
Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2020 Dec;12(4):1244-1269. doi: 10.1111/aphw.12231. Epub 2020 Oct 2.
4
Using an integrated social cognition model to predict COVID-19 preventive behaviours.利用综合社会认知模型预测 COVID-19 预防行为。
Br J Health Psychol. 2020 Nov;25(4):981-1005. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12465. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
5
Social isolation in Covid-19: The impact of loneliness.新冠疫情中的社交隔离:孤独感的影响。
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2020 Sep;66(6):525-527. doi: 10.1177/0020764020922269. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
6
Mental Health Care Measures in Response to the 2019 Novel Coronavirus Outbreak in Korea.韩国应对2019新型冠状病毒疫情的心理健康护理措施
Psychiatry Investig. 2020 Feb;17(2):85-86. doi: 10.30773/pi.2020.0058. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
7
Psychological interventions for people affected by the COVID-19 epidemic.针对受新冠疫情影响人群的心理干预措施。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Apr;7(4):300-302. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30073-0. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
8
Efficacy of a Self-Regulation-Based Electronic and Mobile Health Intervention Targeting an Active Lifestyle in Adults Having Type 2 Diabetes and in Adults Aged 50 Years or Older: Two Randomized Controlled Trials.一项针对2型糖尿病成年人及50岁及以上成年人积极生活方式的基于自我调节的电子和移动健康干预措施的效果:两项随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Aug 2;21(8):e13363. doi: 10.2196/13363.
9
A Self-Regulation-Based eHealth and mHealth Intervention for an Active Lifestyle in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.一项基于自我调节的电子健康和移动健康干预措施,用于2型糖尿病成年人的积极生活方式:一项随机对照试验的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Mar 22;8(3):e12413. doi: 10.2196/12413.
10
Social isolation, loneliness and health in old age: a scoping review.老年期的社会隔离、孤独与健康:一项范围综述
Health Soc Care Community. 2017 May;25(3):799-812. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12311. Epub 2015 Dec 28.